An invitation for public participation in ecological restoration: The reasonable person model

Ecological Restoration

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 178-186

  Phalen, Kimberly Bosworth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Chicago Wilderness; Ecological restoration; Montrose Point; Public participation; Reasonable Person Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650151329     PISSN: 15434060     EISSN: 15434079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3368/er.27.2.178     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Anonymous. 2007. Cook County president lifts restoration moratorium. Chicago Wilderness Winter. www.chicagowildernessmag.org/issues/ winter2007/news/restoration.html
2. Barro, S.C. and A.D. Bright. 1998. Public views on ecological restoration: A snapshot from the Chicago area. Restoration & Management Notes 16:59-65.
3. Berman, M., J. Jonides and S. Kaplan. 2008. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science 19:1207-1212.
4. Chase, W.G. and H.A. Simon. 1973. The mind's eye in chess. Pages 215-281 in W.G. Chase (ed), Visual Information Processing. New York: Academic Press.
5. ChicagoLand Online Nature Knowledge (CLONK). 2000. Natural areas restoration in Cook County Forest Preserves: People working together to help nature. The unofficial Cook County Forest Preserve District page. users. rcn.com/clonk/CCFPD/NaturalAreas/ index.html
6. Cimprich, B. 1992. Attentional fatigue following breast cancer surgery. Research in Nursing and Health 15:199-207.
7. -. 1993. Development of an intervention to restore attention in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing 16:83-92.
8. De Groot, A.D. 1965. Thought and Choice in Chess. Trans. and ed. G.W. Baylor. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
9. Ghioto, G. 2000. Forest thinning foiled again. Arizona Daily Sun October 27. hdl.handle.net/2019/91
10. Gobster, P.H. 1997. The Chicago Wilderness and its Critics: III. The other side; A survey of the arguments. Restoration & Management Notes 15:32-37.
11. Gobster, P.H. and S.C. Barro. 2000. Negotiating nature: Making restoration happen in an urban park context. Pages 185-207 in P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hill (eds), Restoring Nature.
12. Gobster, P.H. and R.B. Hill. 2000. Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington DC: Island Press.
13. Grese, R.E., R. Kaplan, R.L. Ryan and J. Buxton. 2000. Psychological benefits of volunteering in stewardship programs. Pages 265-280 in P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hill (eds), Restoring Nature.
14. Hartig, T., M. Mang and G.W. Evans. 1991. Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior 23:3-26.
15. Helford, R.M. 2000. Constructing nature as constructing science: Expertise, activist science, and public conflict in the Chicago Wilderness. Pages 119-142 in P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hill (eds), Restoring Nature.
16. Jordan, W.R., III. 1997. The Chicago Wilderness and its critics: Progress and controversy on a restoration frontier. Restoration & Management Notes 15:16.
17. Kaplan, R. 1993. Physical models in decision making for design: Theoretical and methodological issues. Pages 61-86 in R.W. Marans and D. Stokols (eds), Environmental Simulation: Research and Policy Issues. New York: Plenum Press.
18. Kaplan, R. and S. Kaplan. 1989a. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Repr., Ann Arbor MI: Ulrich's, 1995)
19. -. 2005. Preference, restoration, and meaningful action in the context of nearby nature. Pages 271-298 in P.F. Barlett (eds), Urban Place: Reconnecting with the Natural World. Cambridge: MIT Press.
20. Kaplan, R., S. Kaplan, K. Bosworth, L. Kumler, R. Ryan, W. Sullivan and N. Wells. 2008. Participation as a Social and Personal Good. Burlington VT: International Association for Society & Natural Resources.
21. Kaplan, R., S. Kaplan and R.L. Ryan. 1998. With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature. Washington DC: Island Press.
22. Kaplan, S. and R. Kaplan. 1978. Humanscape: Environments for People. Belmont CA: Duxbury. (Repr., Ann Arbor MI: Ulrich's, 1982)
23. -. 1982. Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World. New York: Praeger. (Repr., Ann Arbor MI: Ulrich's, 1989)
24. -. 1989b. The visual environment: Public participation in design and planning. Journal of Social Issues 45:59-86.
25. -. 2003. Health, supportive environments, and the Reasonable Person Model. American Journal of Public Health 93:1484-1489.
26. Kuo, F.E. and W.C. Sullivan. 2001. Aggression and violence in the inner city: Effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior 33: 543-571.
27. Lambert, A. 1999. Shifting paradigms: The heart in restoration education. Ecological Restoration 17:126-135.
28. Marler, M.J., K. Supplee, M. Wessner and G. Marks. 2005. Changing attitudes about grassland conservation in Missoula, Montana-"Weed capital of the west." Ecological Restoration 23:29-34.
29. Miles, I., W.C. Sullivan and F.E. Kuo. 2000. Psychological benefits of volunteering for restoration projects. Ecological Restoration 18:218-227.
30. Miller, J.R. and R.J. Hobbs. 2002. Conservation where people live and work. Conservation Biology 16:330-337.
31. Nassauer, J.I. 1995. Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal 14: 161-170.
32. Ostergren, D.M., J.B. Abrams and K.A. Lowe. 2008. Fire in the forest: Public perceptions of ecological restoration in north-central Arizona. Ecological Restoration 26:51-60.
33. Ross, L.M. 1997. The Chicago Wilderness and its critics: I. The Chicago Wilderness; A coalition for urban conservation. Restoration & Management Notes 15:17-24.
34. Sauer, L. and Andropogon Associates. 1998. The North Woods of Central Park. Pages 195-209 in L. Sauer and Andropogon Associates (eds), The Once and Future Forest: A Guide to Forest Restoration Strategies. Washington DC: Island Press.
35. Schroeder, H. 2000. The restoration experience: Volunteers' motives, values, and concepts of nature. Pages 247-264 in P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hill (eds), Restoring Nature.
36. Shore, D. 1997. The Chicago Wilderness and its critics: II. Controversy erupts over restoration in Chicago area. Restoration & Management Notes 15:25-31.
37. Siewers, A. 1998. Making the quantum culture leap: Reflections on the Chicago controversy. Restoration & Management Notes 16:8-15.
38. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group (SER). 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration, vers. 2. www.ser.org& Tucson AZ: Society for Ecological Restoration International. www.ser.org/pdf/primer3.pdf
39. Taylor, A.F., F.E. Kuo and W. Sullivan. 2002. Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. Journal of Environmental Psychology 22:49-63.
40. Tennessen, C.M. and B. Cimprich. 1995. Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15:77-85.
41. Woodall, C., A. Handler and L. Broberg. 2000. Social dilemmas in grassland restoration: Integrating ecology and community on a Montana mountainside. Ecological Restoration 18:39-44.