Promiscuity in the Andes: Species relationships in Polylepis (Rosaceae, Sanguisorbeae) based on AFLP and morphology

Systematic Botany

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 547-559

  Schmidt Lebuhn, Alexander N ^a,b   Kessler, Michael ^a   Kumar, Mahendra ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSIDAD ARTURO PRAT   (Chile)

Author keywords

AFLP; Andes; Phylogeny; Polylepis; Rosaceae; Sanguisorbeae

Indexed keywords

POLYLEPIS; ROSACEAE;

EID: 67650115222     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1600/036364406778388629     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. BAILEY, C. D., T. G. CARR, S. A. HARRIS, and C. E. HUGHES. 2003. Characterization of angiosperm nrDNA polymorphism, paralogy, and pseudogenes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 435-455.
2. BÄNFER, G., B. FIALA, and K. WEISING. 2004. AFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships among myrmecophytic species of Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae) and their allies. Plant Systematics and Evolution 249: 213-231.
3. BEUZENBERG, E. J. and J. B. HAIR. 1983. Contributions to a chromosome atlas of the New Zealand flora: 25 miscellaneous species. New Zealand Journal of Botany 21: 13-20.
4. BITTER, G. 1911. Revision der Gattung Polylepis. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 45: 564-656.
5. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino-acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
6. _. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
7. CZAPIK, R. 1996. Frequency of agamospermy. Apomixis Newsletter 9.
8. ERIKSSON, T. 1999. Autodecay ver. 4.0 (computer program distributed by the author). Stockholm: Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
9. _, M. S. HIBBS, A. D. YODER, C. F. DELWICHE, and M. J. DONOGHUE. 2003. The phylogeny of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL/F region of chloroplast DNA. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 197-211.
10. FARRIS, J. S. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology 18: 374-85.
11. _. 1988. Hennig86 version 1.5 reference manual. Port Jefferson Station, published by the author.
12. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
13. FJELDSÅ, J. and M. KESSLER. 1996. Conserving the biological diversity of Polylepis woodlands of the highland of Peru and Bolivia: a contribution to sustainable natural resource management in the Andes. Copenhagen: NORDECO.
14. GOLDBLATT, P. 1985. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1982-1983. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 13. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden.
15. _ and D. E. JOHNSON. 1990. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1986-1987. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 23. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden.
16. GOWER, J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent roots and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53: 325-338.
17. GRAF, K. 1986. Klima und Vegetationsgeographie der Anden - Grundzüge Südamerikas und pollenanalytische Spezialuntersuchungen Boliviens. Schriftenreihe Physische Geographie Vol. 19. Zürich: Department of Geography University of Zürich.
18. GRUBER, V. 1991. Heterozygosis in tetraploid potatoes revealed by rDNA polymorphism analysis of their dihaploid progenies. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1045-1054.
19. GUSTAFSSON, M. H. G. and K. BREMER. 1995. Morphology and phylogenetic interrelationships of the Asteraceae, Calyceraceae, Campanulaceae, Goodeniaceae, and related families (Asterales). American Journal of Botany 82: 250-265.
20. JORDAN, E. 1983. Die Verbreitung von Polylepis-Beständen in der Westkordillere Boliviens. Tuexenia 3: 101-112.
21. KERR, M. S. 2003. A phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis of Sanguisorbeae (Rosaceae) with emphasis on the pleistocene radiation of the high Andean genus Polylepis. Ph.D. thesis. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
22. KESSLER, M. 1995a. The genus Polylepis (Rosaceae) in Bolivia. Candollea 50: 131-171.
23. _. 1995b. Polylepis-Wälder Boliviens: Taxa, Ökologie, Verbreitung und Geschichte. Berlin/Stuttgart: J. Cramer.
24. _. 1995c. Revalidacion de Polylepis rugulosa Bitter (Rosaceae). Gayana Botany 52: 49-51.
25. _ and A. N. SCHMIDT-LEBUHN. 2006. Taxonomical and distributional notes on Polylepis (Rosaceae). Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 6: 67-69.
26. MOORE, D. M. 1981. Chromosome numbers of Fuegian angiosperms. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana, se ries 2, 53: 995-1012.
27. MOORE, R. J. 1973. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1967-1971. Regnum vegetabile 90. Utrecht: Oosthoek.
28. MUELLER, U. and L. LAREESA WOLFENBARGER. 1999. AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 389-394.
29. NEI, M. and W. H. LI. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 76: 5269-5273.
30. ROMOLEROUX, K. 1996. Rosaceae. Pp. 1-152 in Flora of Ecuador, vol. 56, eds. G. Harling and L. Andersson. Copenhagen: Council for Nordic Publications in Botany.
31. ROULET, M. 1981. Contribution à l'etude du genre Acaena L. (Rosaceae) dans les Andes Argentines et Chiliennes. Bulletin de la Société Neuchâteloise de Sciences Naturelles 104: 145-151.
32. SALGADO-LABOURIAU, M. 1979. Modern pollen deposition in the Venezuelan Andes. Grana 18: 53-59.
33. SCHMIDT-LEBUHN, A. N., M. KUMAR, and M. KESSLER. 2006. An assessment of the genetic population structure of two species of Polylepis Ruiz & Pav. (Rosaceae) in the Chilean Andes. Flora 201: 317-325.
34. SIMPSON, B. B. 1979. A revision of the genus Polylepis (Rosaceae: Sanguisorbeae). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 43: 1-62.
35. _. 1986. Speciation and specialization of Polylepis in the Andes. Pp. 304-316 in High altitude tropical biogeography, eds. F. Vuillemier and M. Monasterio. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*, phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) version 4.0b10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
37. SYSTAT 1997. SYSTAT for Windows, statistics, version 7.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc..
38. VAN DE PEER, Y. and R. DE WACHTER. 1994. TREECON for Windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Computational Applications in Biosciences 10: 569-570.
39. VOS, P., R. HOGERS, M. BLEEKER, M. REIJANS, T. VAN DE LEE, M. HORNES, A. FREUTERS, J. POT, J. PELEMAN, M. KUIPER, and M. ZABEAU. 1995. AFLP, a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407-4414.
40. ZHANG, L.-B., H. P. COMES, and J. W. KADEREIT. 2001. Phylogeny and quarternary history of the European montane/alpine endemic Soldanella (Primulaceae) based on ITS and AFLP variation. American Journal of Botany 88: 2331-2345.
41. ZHANG, Q. F., M. A. S. MAROOF, and P. G. YANG. 1992. Ribosomal DNA polymorphisms and the oriental-occidental genetic differentiation in cultivated barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 84: 682-687.
42. ZHUKOVA, A. P. G. 1967. [Chromosome numbers in some plants in the Arctic-Alpine Botanical Garden] (Russian). Pp. 139-149 in Plantarum in zonam Polarem Transportatio 2, ed. N. A. Duronin. Leningrad.