Analysis of clonal variations in cultivated quince (Cydonia oblonga ‘kalecik’) based on fruit characteristics and SSR markers

New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 113-120

  Dumanoglu, Hatice ^a   Gunes, Nurdan Tuna ^a   Aygun, Ahmet ^b   San, Bekir ^c   Akpinar, Ali Emre ^a   Bakir, Melike ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ORDU UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Clone; Cydonia oblonga; Microsatellite markers; Selection; Total pectins; Total phenolics

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; CLONAL ORGANISM; CULTIVAR; DICOTYLEDON; FRUIT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; PHENOLIC COMPOUND; PLANTATION;

CYDONIA OBLONGA;

EID: 67650108599     PISSN: 01140671     EISSN: 11758783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01140670909510256     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bao, L, Chen, K, Zhang, D, Cao, Y, Yamamoto, T, and Teng, Y. 2007. Genetic diversity and similarity of pear (Pyrus L.) cultivars native to East Asia revealed by SSR (simple sequence repeat) markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 57:959–971.
2. Browicz, K. 1972. “ Cydonia Miller ”. In Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Edited by:Davis, PH. 157Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.
3. Decroocq, V, Fave, MG, Hagen, L, Bordenave, L, and Decroocq, S. 2003. Development and transferability of apricot and grape EST microsatellite markers across taxa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 106:912–922.
4. FAO. 2007. Agricultural Statistics, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. http:\\www.faostat.fao.org [accessed 23 March 2009]
5. Forni, E, Penci, M, and Polesello, A. 1994. A preliminary characterization of some pectins from quince fruit (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) and prickly pear (Opuntia ficus indica) peel. Carbohydrate Polymers, 23:231–234.
6. Galli, Z, Halász, G, Kiss, E, Heszky, L, and Dobránszki, J. 2005. Molecular identification of commercial apple cultivare with microsatellite markers. HortScience, 40:1974–1977.
7. Ghosh, AK, Lukens, LN, Hunter, DM, and Strommer, JN. 2006. European and Asian pears:simple sequence repeat-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis-based analyses of commercially important North American cultivare. HortScience, 41:304–309.
8. Gianfranceschi, L, Seglias, N, Tarchini, R, Komjanc, M, and Gessler, C. 1998. Simple sequence repeats for the genetic analysis of apple. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 96:1069–1076.
9. Gorski, PM, and Creasy, LL. 1977. Color development in Golden Delicious apples. Journal of The American Society for Horticultural Science, 102:73–75.
10. Gungor, MK. 1989. Selection studies on inside Anatolia quinces, Turkey:Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara University. Unpublished PhD thesis
11. Gurses, OL, and Artik, N. 1987. Cay analiz yöntemleri, Ankara:Caykur Publishers.
12. Hokanson, SC, Szewc-Mc Fadden, AK, Lamboy, WP, and McfersonJr. 1998. Microsatellite (SSR) markers reveal genetic identities, genetic diversity and relationship in a Malus x domestica Borkh. core subset collection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 97:671–683.
13. Kimura, T, Shi, YZ, Shoda, M, Kotobuki, K, Matsuta, N, Hayashi, T, Ban, Y, and Yamamoto, T. 2002. Identification of Asian pear varieties by SSR analysis. Breeding Science, 52:115–121.
14. Lefort, F, Lally, M, Thompson, D, and Douglas, GC. 1998. Morfolojical traits microsatellite fingerprinting and genetic relatedness of a stand of elite oaks (Q. robur L.) at Tuallynally, Ireland. Silvae Genética, 47:5–6.
15. Liebhard, R, Gianfranceschi, L, Koller, B, Ryder, CD, Tarchini, R, van De Weg, E, and Gessler, C. 2002. Development and characterization of 140 new microsatellites in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Molecular Breeding, 10:217–241.
16. McGuire, RG. 1992. Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience, 27:1254–1255.
17. Paetkau, D, Calvert, W, Stirling, I, and Strobeck, C. 1995. Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Molecular Ecology, 4:347–354.
18. Rohlf FJ 1988. Applied Biostatistics Inc. New York.
19. Silva, BM, Andrade, PB, Valentao, P, Mendes, GC, Seabra, RM, and Ferreira, MA. 2000. Phenolic profile in the evaluation of commercial quince jellies authenticity. Food Chemistry, 71:281–285.
20. Singleton, VL, and Rossi, JA. 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic- phosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 16:144–158.
21. Sneath, PHA, and Sokal, RR. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy, San Francisco, CA, United States:W.H. Freeman and Company.
22. Tuna-Gunes, N. 2003. Changes in ethylene production in quince (Cydonia vulgaris L.) and the use of ethylene production to predict harvest maturity. European Journal of Horticultural Science, 68:212–221.
23. Wagner, HW, and Sefc, KM. 1999. Identity 1.0 Centre for Applied Genetics, Vienna:University of Agricultural Science.
24. Westwood, MN. 1993. Temperate-Zone Pomology Physiology and Culture., 3rd ed., Portland, Oregon:Timber Press Inc.
25. Wünsch, A, and Hormaza, JI. 2007. Characterization of variability and genetic similarity of European pear using microsatellite loci developed in apple. Scientia Horticulturae, 113:37–43.
26. Yamamoto, T, Kimura, T, Sawamura, Y, Kotobuki, K, Ban, Y, Hayashi, T, and Matsuta, N. 2001. SSRs isolated from apple can identify polymorphism and genetic diversity in pear. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 102:865–870.
27. Yamamoto, T, Kimura, T, Sawamura, Y, Manabe, T, Kotobuki, K, Hayashi, T, Ban, Y, and Matsuta, N. 2002. Simple sequence repeats for genetic analysis in pear. Euphytica, 124:129–137.
28. Yamamoto, T, Kimura, TJ, Soejima, T, Sanada, T, Ban, Y, and Hayashi, T. 2004. Identification of quince varieties using SSR marker developed from pear and apple. Breeding Science, 54:239–244.
29. Yap, IV, and Nelson, RJ. 1996. WinBoot:a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms, Manila, Philippines:International Rice Research Institute.