Parallelization spectroscopy: Analysis of thread-level parallelism in HPC programs

Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, PPOPP

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 293-294

  Kejariwal, Arun ^a   Casçaval, Cǎlin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Loop Transofrmations; Multithreading; Parallelism

Indexed keywords

HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING; LOOP TRANSOFRMATIONS; MULTITHREADING; PARALLELISM; PARALLELIZATION; PARALLELIZING; THREAD LEVEL PARALLELISM;

PARALLEL ARCHITECTURES;

PARALLEL PROGRAMMING;

EID: 67650079646     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1504176.1504221     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. G. Bikshandi et al. Programming for parallelism and locality with Hierarchically Tiled Arrays. In Proceedings of PPOPP 2006, pages 48-57, New York, NY, 2006. (Pubitemid 44758674)
2. P. Bose. Workload characterization: A key aspect of microarchitecture design. IEEE Micro, 26(2):5-6, 2006.
3. Chapel. http://chapel.cs.washington.edu.
4. CPMD Consortium page. http://www.cpmd.org.
5. Project Fortree Overview. http://projectfortress.sun.com.
6. A. Kejariwal, X. Tian, W. Li, M. Girkar, S. Kozhukhov, H. Saito, U. Banerjee, A. Nicolau, A. V. Veidenbaum, and C. D. Polychronopoulos. On the performance potential of different types of speculative thread-level parallelism. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Supercomputing, pages 24-35, Cairns, Australia, 2006.
7. M. Kulkarni, K. Pingali, B. Walter, G. Ramanarayanan, K. Bala, and L. P. Chew. Optimistic parallelism requires abstractions. In Proceedings of PLDI 2007, pages 211-222, San Diego, CA, 2007. (Pubitemid 47630689)
8. LAM MPI Parallel Computing. http://www.lam-mpi.org/.
9. (Linear Algebra PACKage). http://www.netlib.org/lapack/.
10. OpenMP Specification, version 2.5. http://www.openmp.org.
11. UPC. http://upc.gwu.edu/.
12. C. von Praun, R. Bordawekar, and C. Caşcaval. Modeling optimistic concurrency using quantitative dependence analysis. In Proceedings of PPOPP 2008, pages 185-196, Salt Lake City, UT, 2008.
13. M. J.Wolfe. More iteration space tiling. In Proceedings of Supercomputing '89, Nov. 1989.
14. P. Wu, A. Kejariwal, and C. Caşcaval. Compiler-driven dependence profiling to guide program parallelization. In Proceedings of the 21st InternationalWorkshop on Languages and Compilers for Parallel Computing, Alberta, Canada, 2008.
15. The X10 Programming Language. http://www.x10-lang.org.