Simulation studies of ideal free distribution and competition

Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 54, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 329-344

  Moorhead, Daryl ^a   Herman, John ^a,b   Pisarczyk, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

^b Division of Mathematics and Science   (United States)

Author keywords

Clethrionomys gapperi; Density dependent habitat selection; Flour beetles; Free distribution; Habitron; Lotka Volterra model; Red backed voles; Tribolium

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EMIGRATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FITNESS; HABITAT AVAILABILITY; HABITAT SELECTION; HABITAT USE; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; NUMERICAL MODEL; POPULATION DENSITY;

CLETHRIONOMYS; CLETHRIONOMYS GAPPERI; COLEOPTERA; MURIDAE; TRIBOLIUM (BEETLE);

EID: 67650079135     PISSN: 15659801     EISSN: 22244662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1560/IJEE.54.3-4.329     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abrams, P.A. 2007. habitat choice in predator-prey systems: spatial instability due interacting adaptive movements. Am. Nat. 169: 581-594.
2. Abrams, P.A., Cressman, R., Krivan, V. 2007. The role of behavioral dynamics in determining the patch distributions of interacting species. Am. Nat. 169: 505-518.
3. Armstrong, R.A., McGehee, R. 1980. Competitive exclusion. Am. Nat. 115: 151-170.
4. Bauer, S., Samietz, J., berger, U. 2005. Sexual harassment in heterogeneous landscapes can mediate population regulation in a grasshopper. Behav. Ecol. 16: 239-246.
5. Bélanger, G., Rodríguez, M. A. 2002. Local movement as a measure of habitat quality in stream salmonids. Environ. Biol. Fish. 64: 155-164.
6. Berec, M., Krivan, V. , Berec, L. 2006. asymmetric competition, body size, and foraging tactics: testing the ideal free distribution in two competing fsh species. evol. Ecol. Res. 8: 929-942.
7. Brown, J.S. 1998. Game theory and habitat selection. In: dugatkin, L.A., Reeve, H.K., eds. Game theory and animal behavior. Oxford university Press, New York, Oxford, pp. 188-220.
8. Carr, D., Bowman, J., Wilson, P.J. 2007. density-dependent dispersal suggests a genetic measure of habitat suitability Oikos 116: 629-635.
9. Chu, C., Collins, N.C., Lester, N.P., Shuter, B.J. 2006. Population dynamics of smallmouth bass in response to habitat supply. Ecol. Model. 195: 349-362.
10. Cressman, R., Krivan, V. 2006. Migration dynamics for the ideal free distribution. Am. Nat. 168: 384-397.
11. Cressman, R., Krivan, V. , Garay, J. 2004. Ideal free distributions, evolutionary games, and population dynamics in multiple-species environments. Am. Nat. 164: 473-489.
12. desharnais R.A., edmunds, J., Costantino, R.F., henson, S.M. 2005. Species competition: uncertainty on double invariant loop. J. Diff. Equat. Appl. 11: 311-325.
13. Donahue, M.J. 2006. Allee effects and conspecifc cueing jointly lead to conspecifc attraction. Oecologia 149: 33-43.
14. Englert, T.L., Wells, A.W., Norris, R.A. 2000. Incorporation of changes in habitat quantity and quality into density-dependent population models. Environ. Sci. Policy 3: 451-458.
15. Fretwell, S.D., Lucas, H.L.Jr. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors infuencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor. 19: 16-36.
16. Ghent, A.W. 1963. Studies of behavior of Tribolium four beetles. I. Contrasting responses of T. castaneum and T. confusum to fresh and conditioned fours. Ecology 44: 269-283.
17. Grand, T.C. 2002. Alternative forms of competition and predation dramatically affect habitat selection under foraging - predation-risk trade-offs. Behav. Ecol. 13: 280-290.
18. Greene, C.M., Stamps, J.A. 2001. habitat selection at low population densities. Ecology 82: 2091-2100.
19. Guthrie, C.G., Moorhead, D.L. 2002. Density-dependent habitat selection: evaluating isoleg theory with a Lotka-Volterra model. Oikos 97: 184-194.
20. heithaus, M.R. 2001. habitat selection by predators and prey in communities with asymmetrical intraguild predation. Oikos 92: 542-554.
21. Krivan, V. 2003. Ideal free distributions when resources undergo population dynamics. Theor. Popul. Biol. 64: 25-38.
22. Krivan, V. , Sirot, E. 2002. habitat selection by two competing species in a two-habitat environment. Am. Nat. 160: 214-234.
23. Krivan, V. , Vrkoc, I. 2007. A Lyapunov function for piecewise- independent differential equations: stability of the ideal free distribution in two patch environments. J. Math. Biol. 54: 465-488.
24. Morris, D.W. 1987. Tests of density-dependent habitat selection in a patchy environment. Ecol. Monogr. 57: 269-281.
25. Morris, D.W. 1988. habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure. evol. Ecol. 2: 253-269.
26. Morris, D.W. 1998. State-dependent optimization of litter size. Oikos 83: 518-528.
27. Morris, D.W. 1999a. has the ghost of competition passed? Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 3-20.
28. Morris, D.W. 1999b. a haunting legacy from isoclines: mammal coexistence and the ghost of competition. J. Mammal. 80: 375-384.
29. Morris, D.W. 2003. Shadows of predation: habitat-selecting consumers eclipse competition between coexisting prey. Evol. Ecol. 17: 393-422.
30. Morris, D.W. 2005. Habitat-dependent foraging in a classic predator-prey system: a fable from snowshoe hares. Oikos 109: 239-254
31. Morris, D.W., Mukherjee, S. 2007. Can we measure carrying capacity with foraging behavior? Ecology 88: 597-604.
32. Morris, D.W., Lundberg, P., Ripa, J. 2001. hamilton's rule confronts ideal free habitat selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268: 921-924.
33. Morris, D.W., diffendorfer, J.e., Lundberg, P. 2004. dispersal among habitats varying in ftness: reciprocating migration through ideal habitat selection. Oikos 107: 559-575.
34. Nathanson, M. 1975. The effect of resource limitation on competing populations of four beetles, Tribolium spp. (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Bull. entomol. Res. 65: 1-12.
35. Palmqvist, E., Lundberg, P., Jonzen, N. 2000. Linking resource matching and dispersal. Evol. Ecol. 14: 1-12.
36. Park, T. 1948. Interspecies competition in populations of Tribolium confusum Duval and Tribolium castaneum herbst. Ecol. Monogr. 18: 265-307.
37. Park, T. 1954. experimental studies of interspecies competition. II. Temperature, humidity and competition in two species of Tribolium. Physiol. Zool. 27: 177-238.
38. Park, T. 1957. experimental studies of interspecies competition. III. Relation of initial species proportion to the competitive outcome in populations of Tribolium. Physiol. Zool. 30: 22-40.
39. Pimm, S.L., Rosenzweig, M.L. 1981. Competitors and habitat use. Oikos 37: 1-6.
40. Pöysä, h. 2001. Dynamics of habitat distribution in breeding mallards: assessing the applicability of current habitat selection models. Oikos 94: 365-373.
41. Prus, T. 1961. The effect of homotypic and heterotypic conditioning of medium upon the net fecundity of Tribolium castaneum Herbst and Tribolium confusum Duval. Ekol. Pol. (a) 9: 245-257.
42. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1981. a theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62: 327-335.
43. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1985. Some theoretical aspects of habitat selection. In: Cody, M.L., ed. habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, New York, pp. 517-540.
44. Rosenzweig, M.L., abramsky, Z. 1986. Centrifugal community organization. Oikos 46: 339-348.
45. Shenbrot, G., Krasnov, B., Burdelov, S. 2006. density-independent habitat distribution caused by density-dependent habitat selection. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8: 1277-1290.
46. Shochat, E., Abramsky, Z., Pinshow, B., Whitehouse, M.E.A. 2002. Density-dependent habitat selection in migratory passerines during stopover: what causes the deviation from IFD? Evol. Ecol. 16: 469-488.
47. Tyler, J.A., Rose, K.A. 1997. Effects of individual habitat selection in a heterogenous environment on fsh cohort survivorship: a modeling analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 122-136.
48. Zeigler, J.R. 1976. evolution of the migration response: emigration by Tribolium and the infuence of age. Ecology 30: 579-592.