Has the ghost of competition passed?

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 3-20

  Morris, Douglas W ^a  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Co existence; Competition; Ghost of competition; Habitat selection; Isocline; Isodar; Isoleg

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000845551     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abramsky, Z., Bowers, M.A. and Rosenzweig, M.L. 1986. Detecting interspecific competition in the field: Testing the regression method. Oikos, 47: 199-204.
2. Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Pinshow, B., Brown, J.S., Kotler, B. and Mitchell, W.A. 1990. Habitat selection: An experimental field test with two gerbil species. Ecology, 71: 2358-2379.
3. Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L. and Pinshow, B. 1991. The shape of a gerbil isocline measured using principles of optimal habitat selection. Ecology, 72: 329-340.
4. Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L. and Subach, A. 1992. The shape of a gerbil isocline: An experimental field study. Oikos, 63: 193-199.
5. Abramsky, Z., Ovadia, O. and Rosenzweig, M.L. 1994. The shape of a Gerbillus pyramidum (Rodentia: Gerbillinae) isocline: An experimental field study. Oikos, 69: 318-326.
6. Brown, J.H. 1971. Mechanisms of competitive exclusion between two species of chipmunks. Ecology, 52: 305-311.
7. Brown, J.S. 1989. Desert rodent community structure: A test of four mechanisms of coexistence. Ecol. Monogr., 59: 1-20.
8. Brown, J.S. and Rosenzweig, M.L. 1986. Habitat selection in slowly regenerating environments. J. Theor. Biol., 123: 151-171.
9. Crowell, K. and Pimm, S.L. 1976. Competition and niche shift of mice introduced onto small islands. Oikos, 27: 251-258.
10. Fox, B.J. and Luo, J. 1996. Estimating competition coefficients from census data: A re-examination of the regression technique. Oikos, 77: 291-300.
11. Fretwell, S.D. and Lucas, H.L., Jr. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds: I. Theoretical development. Acta Bioth., 19: 16-36.
12. Hallett, J.G. and Pimm, S.L. 1979. Direct estimation of competition. Am. Nat., 113: 593-600.
13. Hanski, I. 1995. Effects of landscape pattern on competitive interactions. In Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes (L. Hansson, L. Fahrig and G. Merriam, eds), pp. 203-224. London: Chapman & Hall.
14. Holt, R.D. 1977. Predation, apparent competition and the structure of prey communities. Theor. Pop. Biol., 12: 197-229.
15. Holt, R.D. 1984. Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions and the co-existence of prey species. Am. Nat., 124: 377-406.
16. Holt, R.D. and Lawton, J.H. 1994. The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 25: 495-520.
17. Jeffries, M.J. and Lawton, J.H. 1984. Enemy-free space and the structure of ecological communities. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 23: 269-286.
18. Knight, T.W. and Morris, D.W. 1996. How many habitats do landscapes contain? Ecology, 77: 1756-1764.
19. Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S. and Subach, A. 1993. Mechanisms of species coexistence of optimal foragers: Temporal partitioning by two species of sand dune gerbils. Oikos, 67: 548-556.
20. MacArthur, R.H. and Levins, R. 1964. Competition, habitat selection and character displacement in a patchy environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 51: 1207-1210.
21. Martin, T.E. 1996. Fitness costs of resource overlap among co-existing bird species. Nature, 380: 338-340.
22. Morris, D.W. 1998. Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure. Evol. Ecol., 2: 253-269.
23. Morris, D.W. 1989. Habitat-dependent estimates of competitive interaction. Oikos, 53: 111-120.
24. Morris, D.W. 1990. Temporal variation, habitat selection and community structure. Oikos, 59: 303-312.
25. Morris, D.W. 1992. Scales and costs of habitat selection in heterogeneous landscapes. Evol. Ecol., 6: 412-432.
26. Morris, D.W. 1994. Habitat matching: Alternatives and implications to populations and communities. Evol. Ecol., 8: 387-406.
27. Morris, D.W. 1996a. Temporal and spatial population dynamics among patches connected by habitat selection. Oikos, 75: 207-219.
28. Morris, D.W. 1996b. Coexistence of specialist and generalist rodents via habitat selection. Ecology, 77: 2352-2364.
29. Ovadia, O. and Abramsky, Z. 1995. Density-dependent habitat selection: Evaluation of the isodar method. Oikos, 73: 86-94.
30. Pimm, S.L. 1985. Estimating competition coefficients from census data. Oecologia (Berl.), 67: 588-590.
31. Pimm, S.L. and Rosenzweig, M.L. 1981. Competitors and habitat use. Oikos, 37: 1-6.
32. Pimm, S.L., Rosenzweig, M.L. and Mitchell, W. 1985. Competition and food selection: Field tests of a theory. Ecology, 66: 798-807.
33. Rodríguez, M.A. 1995. Habitat-specific estimates of competition in stream salmonids: A field test of the isodar model of habitat selection. Evol. Ecol., 9: 169-184.
34. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1974. On the evolution of habitat selection. In Proceedings of the First International Congress of Ecology, pp. 401-404. The Hague: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.
35. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1979. Optimal habitat selection in two-species competitive systems. In Population Ecology (U. Halbach and J. Jacobs, eds), pp. 283-293. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
36. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1981. A theory of habitat selection. Ecology, 62: 327-335.
37. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1985. Some theoretical aspects of habitat selection. In Habitat Selection in Birds (M.L. Cody, ed.), pp. 517-540. New York: Academic Press.
38. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1991. Habitat selection and population interactions: The search for mechanism. Am. Nat., 137: S5-S28.
39. Rosenzweig, M.L., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B. and Mitchell, W. 1985. Can interaction coefficients be determined from census data? Oecologia (Berl.), 66: 194-198.
40. Schoener, T. W. 1974. Competition and the form of habitat shift. Theor. Pop. Biol., 6: 265-307.
41. Schoener, T.W. 1985. On the degree of consistency expected when different methods are used to estimate competition coefficients from census data. Oecologia (Berl.), 67: 591-592.
42. Ziv, Y., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B. and Subach, A. 1993. Interference competition and temporal and habitat partitioning in two gerbil species. Oikos, 66: 237-246.
43. Ziv, Y., Kotler, B.P., Abramsky, Z. and Rosenzweig, M.L. 1995. Foraging efficiencies of competing rodents: Why do gerbils exhibit shared-preference habitat selection? Oikos, 73: 260-268.