Capturing the Impact of Membership Turnover in Small Groups via Latent Class Growth Analysis: Modeling the Rise of the New York Knicks of the 1960s and 1970s

Group Dynamics

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 120-132

  Morgan Lopez, Antonio A ^a   Cluff, Laurie A ^a   Fals Stewart, William ^b  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

finite mixture; group research; latent class; teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650067175     PISSN: 10892699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0014095     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agosti V., Nunes E., and Ocepeck-Welikson K. Patient factors related to early attrition from an outpatient cocaine research clinic. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 22 (1996) 29-39
2. Ancona D., Bresman H., and Kaeufer K. The comparative advantage of X-teams. Sloan Management Review 43 (2002) 33-39
3. Ancona D.G., and Caldwell D.F. Rethinking team composition from the outside in. In: Gruenfeld D. (Ed). Composition (1998), Elsevier Science/JAI, Stanford, CT 21-37
4. Arrow H., and McGrath J.E. How member change and continuity affects small group structure, process and performance. Small Group Research 24 (1993) 334-361
5. Arrow H., and McGrath J.E. Membership dynamics in groups at work: A theoretical framework. In: Staw B.M., and Cummings L.L. (Eds). Research in organizational behavior (1995), JAI, Greenwich, CT 373-411
6. Barry B., and Stewart G.L. Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (1997) 62-78
7. Bates M.E., Pawlak A.P., Tonigan J.S., and Buckman J.F. Cognitive impairment influences drinking outcome by altering therapeutic mechanisms of change. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 20 (2006) 241-253
8. Choi H., and Thompson L. Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 98 (2005) 121-132
9. DiClemente C.C., and Scott C.W. Stages of change: Interactions with treatment compliance and involvement. NIDA Research Monograph 165 (1997) 131-156
10. Dineen B.R., and Noe R.A. The impact of team fluidity and its implications for human resource management research and practice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 22 (2003) 1-37
11. Fals-Stewart W., and Lucente S. Effect of neurocognitive status and personality functioning on length of stay in residential substance abuse treatment: An integrative study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 8 (1994) 179-190
12. Fals-Stewart W., O'Farrell T.J., and Birchler G.R. Behavioral couples therapy for substance abuse: Rationale, methods, and findings. Science and Practice Perspectives 2 (2004) 30-41
13. Fine B.D. Comparison of work groups with a stable and unstable membership. Journal of Applied Psychology 55 (1971) 170-174
14. Goodman P.S., and Leyden D.P. Familiarity and group productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology 76 (1991) 578-586
15. Grella C.E., Hser Y., Joshi V., and Anglin M.D. Patient histories, retention, and outcome models for younger and older adults in DATOS. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 57 (1999) 151-166
16. Guzzo R.A., and Dickson M.W. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology 47 (1996) 307-338
17. Halfhill T., Sundstrom E., Lahner J., Calderone W., and Nielsen T. Group personality composition and group effectiveness: An integrative review of empirical research. Small Group Research 36 (2005) 83-105
18. Hollinger J. Pro basketball forecast: 2005-06 (2005), Brassey's, Washington, DC
19. Kubatko J., Oliver D., Pelton K., and Rosenbaum D.T. A starting point for analyzing basketball statistics. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 3 3 (2007) 1-22
20. Lanza S.T., Flaherty B.P., and Collins L.M. Latent class and latent transition analysis. In: Schinka J.A., and Velicer W.F. (Eds). Handbook of Psychology: Vol. 2. Research Methods in Psychology (2003), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ 663-685
21. LePine J.A. Team adaptation and postchange performance: Effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003) 27-39
22. Marmarosh C., Holtz A., and Schottenbauer M. Group cohesiveness, group-derived collective self-esteem, group-derived hope, and the well-being of group therapy members. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 9 (2005) 32-44
23. Mathiyalakan S. A methodology for controlled empirical investigation of membership continuity and change in GDSS groups. Decision Support Systems 32 (2002) 279-295
24. McGrath J., Arrow H., and Berdahl J. The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4 (2000) 95-105
25. Montgomery C. Role of dynamic group therapy. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 8 (2002) 34-41
26. Morgan-Lopez A.A., and Fals-Stewart W. Analytic complexities associated with group therapy in substance abuse treatment research: Problems, recommendations, and future directions. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 14 (2006) 265-273
27. Morgan-Lopez A.A., and Fals-Stewart W. Analytic methods for modeling longitudinal data from rolling therapy groups with membership turnover. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 75 (2007) 580-593
28. Morgan-Lopez A.A., and Fals-Stewart W. Analyzing data from open enrollment groups: Current considerations and future directions. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 35 (2008) 36-40
29. Morgan-Lopez A.A., and Fals-Stewart W. Consequences of misspecifying the number of latent treatment attendance classes in modeling group membership turnover within ecologically-valid behavioral treatment trials. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 35 (2008) 396-409
30. Muthén B. Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika 29 (2002) 81-117
31. Muthén L.K., and Muthén B.O. Mplus users guide. 4th ed. (1998-2006), Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles
32. Nagin D.S. Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semi-parametric group-based approach. Psychological Methods 4 (1999) 139-157
33. National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse, and National Institute on Drug Abuse. Request for applications for group therapy for individuals in drug abuse and alcoholism treatment (RFA-DA-04-008) (2003), Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC
34. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Group therapy research. Workshop sponsored by the NIDA Behavioral Treatment Branch (2003, April). http://www.drugabuse.gov/whatsnew/meetings/grouptherapy.html Retrieved November 28, 2006 from http://www.drugabuse.gov/whatsnew/meetings/grouptherapy.html
35. Schafer J.L., and Graham J.W. Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods 7 (2002) 147-177
36. Sundstrom E., McIntyre M., Halfhill T., and Richards H. Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice 4 (2000) 44-67
37. Weiss R.D., Jaffe W.B., de Menil V.P., and Cogley C.B. Group therapy for substance use disorders: What do we know?. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 12 (2004) 339-350