Spillover asymmetry and why it matters

Management Science

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 373-388

  Knott, Anne Marie ^a   Posen, Hart E ^b   Wu, Brian ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Banking; Innovation; Spillovers

Indexed keywords

BANKING; BANKING INDUSTRY; ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY; ENDOGENOUS GROWTH; EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS; FUNCTIONAL FORMS; INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION; OPTIMAL ENVIRONMENT; SPILLOVERS;

ECONOMICS;

LAKES;

EID: 67649999950     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: 15265501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1080.0950     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abramowitz, M. 1986. Catching up, forging ahead and falling behind. J. Economic History 46 385-406.
2. Acs, Z., D. Audretsch, M. Feldman. 1994. R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Rev. Econom. Statist. 76 336-340.
3. Adams, J. D., A. B. Jaffe. 1996. Bounding the effects of R&D: An investigation using matched establishment-firm data. RAND J. Econom. 27 700-721.
4. Aghion, P., C. Harris, P. Howitt, J. Vickers. 2001. Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 68 467-492.
5. Aigner, D., A. K. Lovell, P. Schmidt. 1977. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J. Econometrics 6 21-37.
6. Akhavein, J., W. S. Frame, L. J. White. 2005. The diffusion of financial innovations: An examination of the adoption of small business credit scoring by large banking organizations. J. Bus. 78 (2) 577-596.
7. Arellano, M., S. Bond. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58 277-297.
8. Arrow, K. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
9. Batiz-Lazo, B., D. Wood. 2002. Information technology innovations and commercial banking: A review and appraisal from an historical perspective. Working paper, Economic History 0211002, Econ WPA.
10. Baumol, W., S. Blackman, E. Wolff. 1989. Productivity and American Leadership: The Long View. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Berger, A. N., R. DeYoung. 1997. Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. J. Banking Finance 21 (6) 849-870.
12. Berger, A. N., D. B. Humphrey. 1992. Output measurement in the service sectors. Measurement and Efficiency Issues in Commercial Banking, National Bureau of Economic Research Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 56. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 245-279.
13. Berger, A., D. Hancock, D. Humphrey. 1993. Bank efficiency derived from the profit function. J. Banking Finance 17 317-347.
14. Black, D., V. Henderson. 1999. A theory of urban growth. J. Political Econom. 2 252-284.
15. Bofondi, M., F. Lotti. 2006. Innovation in the retail banking industry: The diffusion of credit scoring. Rev. Indust. Organ. 28 (4) 343-358.
16. Bromiley, P. 1991. Testing a causal model of corporate risk and performance. Acad. Management J. 34 (1) 37-59.
17. Cebenoyan, A., G. Papaioannou, N. Travlos. 1992. Foreign takeover activity in the United States and wealth effects for target firm shareholders. Financial Management 21 58-68.
18. Cockburn, I., R. Henderson, S. Stern. 2000. Untangling the origins of competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 21 1123-1145.
19. Cohen, W., R. Levin. 1989. Innovation and market structure. R. Schmalensee, R. Willig, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization. Elsevier Science B. V, Amsterdam, Holland, 1059-1107.
20. Cohen, W., R. Nelson, J. Walsh. 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U. S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBERWorking Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
21. Cyert, R., J. March. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. WileyBlackwell, London.
22. Eeckhout, J., B. Jovanovic. 2002. Knowledge spillovers and inequality. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92 1290-1307.
23. Ellison, G., E. Glaeser. 1997. Geographic concentration in U. S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. J. Political Econom. 105 889-927
24. Griliches, Z. 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J. Econom. 10 92-116.
25. Grossman, G., E. Helpman. 1992. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
26. Hannan, T., J. McDowell. 1984. Market concentration and the diffusion of new technology in the banking industry. Rev. Econom. Statist. 66 (4) 686-691.
27. Hermalin, B., N. Wallace. 1994. The determinants of efficiency and solvency in savings and loans. RAND J. Econom. 25 361-381.
28. Holtz-Eakin, D., W. Newey, H. Rosen. 1988. Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 56 1371-1395.
29. Jaffe, A. 1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76 984-1001.
30. Jaffe, A. 1988. Demand and supply influences in R&D intensity and productivity growth. Rev. Econom. Statist. 70 431-437.
31. Jovanovic, B., G. MacDonald. 1994. Competitive diffusion. J. Political Econom. 102 24-52.
32. Jovanovic, B., R. Rob. 1989. The growth and diffusion of knowledge. Rev. Econom. Stud. 56 569-582.
33. Klepper, S. 1996. Exit, entry, growth and innovation over the product life cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86 562-583.
34. Knott, A., H. Posen. 2005. Is failure good? Strategic Management J. 26 (7) 617-641.
35. Knott, A., H. Posen. 2008. Firm R&D behavior and evolving technology in established industries. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print March 20, http://orgsci.journal.informs.org /cgi/content/abstract/orsc.1070.0332v1.
36. Krugman, P. 1979. A model of innovation, technology tansfer and the world distribution of income. J. Political Econom. 87 (21) 253-266.
37. Lerner, J. 2002. Where does state street lead? A first look at finance patents, 1971-2000. J. Finance 57 901-930.
38. Levin, R. 1988. Appropriability, R&D spending, and technological performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78 (2) 424-428.
39. Levin, R., P. Reiss. 1984. Tests of a schumpeterian model of R&D and market structure. Z. Griliches, ed. R&D, Patents and Productivity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 175-204.
40. Levin, R., P. Reiss. 1988. Cost-reducing and demand-creating R&D with spillovers. RAND J. Econom. 19 (4) 538-56.
41. Levin, R., W. Cohen, D. Mowery. 1985. R&D appropriability, opportunity and market structure: New evidence on some schumpeterian hypotheses. Amer. Econom. Rev. Proc. 75 20-24.
42. Mansfield, E. 1968. The Economics of Technological Change. W. W. Norton, New York.
43. Mester, L. 1993. Efficiency in the savings and loan industry. J. Banking Finance 17 267-286.
44. Morgan, D. P., B. Rime, P. E. Strahan. 2004. Bank integration and state business cycles. Quart. J. Econom. 119 (4) 1555-1584.
45. Nelson, R., S. Winter 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
46. Nickell, S. 1981. Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49 1417-1426.
47. Romer, P. M. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. J. Political Econom. 94 1002-1037.
48. Rosenkopf, L., P. Almeida. 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49 (6) 751-766.
49. Sharma, S. 1992. Behind the diffusion curve: An analysis of ATM adoption. Working Paper 686, UCLA Department of Economics, Los Angeles.
50. Spence, A. M. 1984. Cost reduction, competition and industrial performance. Econometrica 52 101-121.
51. Sullivan, R., Z. Wang. 2005. Internet banking: An exploration in technology diffusion and impact. Payments System Research Working Paper PSRWP 05-05, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.
52. Thompson, P. 2006. Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: Evidence from inventorand examiner-added citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88 (2) 383-388.
53. Wheelock, D., P. Wilson. 1995. Evaluating the efficiency of commercial banks: Does our view of what banks do matter? Rev. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. 77 39-52.
54. Wheelock, D., P. Wilson. 2008. Robust non-parametric quantile estimation of efficiency and productivity change in U. S. commercial banking, 1985-2004. J. Bus. Econom. Statist.Forthcoming.