Response to Lindsay, Mansour, Beaudry, Leach and Bertrand's 'Sequential lineup presentation: Patterns and policy'

Legal and Criminological Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 25-30

  Malpass, Roy S ^a   Tredoux, Colin G ^b   McQuiston Surrett, Dawn ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY WEST   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRIMINAL JUSTICE; CRIMINAL LAW; DECISION MAKING; LAW ENFORCEMENT; LEGAL EVIDENCE; MEMORY; NOTE; OFFENDER; POLICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; WITNESS;

EID: 67649971865     PISSN: 13553259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/135532508X384094     Document Type: Note

References (14)

1. Carlson, C. A., Gronlund, S. D., & Clark, S. E. (2008). Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 118-128.
2. Clark, S. E., & Davey, S. L. (2005). The target-to-foils shift in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 29(2), 151-172.
3. Clark, S. E., Howell, R. T., & Davey, S. L. (2008). Regularities in eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 187-218.
4. Gronlund, S. D. (2005). Sequential lineup advantage: Contributions of distinctiveness and recollection. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 23-37.
5. Lindsay, R. C. L. (1999). Applying applied research: Selling the sequential line-up. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 219-225.
6. Lindsay R. C. L., Mansour J., Leach A. M., & Bertrand M. L. (2009). Sequential lineup presentation: Patterns and policy. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 13-24.
7. Loftus, E. F. (1983). Silence is not golden. American Psychologist, 38, 564-572.
8. Malpass, R. S. (2006). A policy evaluation of simultaneous and sequential lineups. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 12(4), 394-418.
9. Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1984). Research on suggestion in lineups and photo spreads. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 64-91). New York, NY: Cambridge.
10. Malpass, R. S., Tredoux, C. G., & McQuiston-Surrett, D. (2009). Public policy and sequential lineups. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 1-12.
11. Malpass, R. S., Tredoux, C. G., Schreiber Compo, N., McQuiston-Surrett, D. E., MacLin, O. H., Zimmerman, L. A., & Topp, L. D. (2008). Study space analysis for policy development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(6), 789-801.
12. Steblay N. (2007, March). 2001+6: An updated meta-analysis of eyewitness lineup performance under sequential versus simultaneous formats. Paper presented at off the witness stand: Using psychology in the practice of justice, CUNY, New York, NY.
13. Technical working group on eyewitness evidence (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement (i-x, pp. 1-44).Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice, URL: http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/ nij/178240.pdf
14. Thompson,W. C., & Cole, S. A. (2006) Psychological aspects of forensic identification evidence. In M. Costanzo, D. Kraus, & K. Pezdek (Eds.), Expert psychological testimony for the courts. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.