Perception du contraste de nasalité vocalique en français

Journal of French Language Studies

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 25-59

  Delvaux, Véronique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649957796     PISSN: 09592695     EISSN: 14740079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0959269508003566     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Bartkova, K. et Sorin, C. (1987). A model of segmental duration for speech synthesis in French. Speech Communication, 6: 245-260.
2. Beddor, P. S. (1993). The perception of nasal vowels. Dans: M. K. Huffman et R. A. Krakow (dir.), Phonetics and Phonology, vol. 5, Nasals, Nasalization and the Velum. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 171-196.
3. Beddor, P. S. et Hawkins, S. (1990). The influence of spectral prominence on perceived vowel quality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87: 2684-2704.
4. Beddor, P. S. et Krakow, R. A. (1999). Perception of coarticulatory nasalization by speakers of English and Thai: Evidence for partial compensation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106: 2868-2887.
5. Beddor, P. S. et Strange,W. (1982). Cross-language study of perception of the oral-nasal distinction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71: 1551-1561.
6. Bernthal, J. E. et Beuckelman, D. R. (1977). The effect of changes in velopharyngeal orifice area on vowel intensity. Cleft Palate Journal 14: 63-77.
7. Bloomer, H. et Peterson, G. (1955). A spectrographic study of hypernasality. Cleft Palate Bulletin, 5: 5-6.
8. Bothorel, A., Simon, P., Wioland, F. et Zerling, J.-P. (1986). Cinéradiographie des voyelles et consonnes du français. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique de Strasbourg, 18.
9. Brichler-Labaeye, C. (1970). Les voyelles françaises. Mouvements et positions articulatoires à la lumière de la radiocinématographie, Paris: Klincksieck, (coll. Bibliothèque française et romane, série A, no 18).
10. Butcher, A. (1976). The influence of the native language on the perception of vowel quality. Arbeitsberichte (Kiel), 6: 1-137.
11. Carlson, R., Fant, G. et Granström, B. (1975). Two-formant models, pitch and vowel perception. Dans: G. Fant et M. A. A. Tatham (dir.), Auditory Analysis and Perception of Speech. London: Academic Press, pp. 55-76.
12. Chistovich, L., Fant, G. et de Serpa-Leitao, A. (1966). Mimicking and perception of synthetic vowels. Part two. STL-SPSR, 3: 1-3.
13. Chistovich, L. A. et Lublinskaya, V. V. (1979). The 'centre of gravity' effect in vowel spectra and critical distance between the formants: psychoacoustical study of the perception of vowel-like stimuli. Hearing Research, 1: 185-195.
14. Chistovich, L. A., Sheikin, R. L. et Lublinskaya, V. V. (1979). 'Centres of gravity' and spectral peaks as the determinants of vowel quality. Dans: B. Lindblom et S. Öhman (dir.), Frontiers of Speech Communication Research. London: Academic Press, pp. 143-157.
15. Dang, J., Honda, K. et Suzuki, H. (1996). Morphological and acoustical analysis of the nasal and the paranasal cavities. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96: 2088-2100.
16. Delattre, P. (1954). Les attributs acoustiques de la nasalité vocalique et consonantique. Studia Linguistica VII/2: 103-109.
17. Delattre, P. (1965). La nasalité vocalique en français et en anglais. The French Review, 39: 92-109.
18. Delattre, P. et Monnot, M. (1968). The role of duration in the identification of French nasal vowels. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 6: 267-288.
19. Delvaux, V. (2000). Etude aérodynamique de la nasalité en français. Actes des XXIIIe Journées d'Etude sur la Parole, Aussois, pp. 141-144.
20. Delvaux, V. (2003). Contrôle et connaissance phonétique: Les voyelles nasales du français. Thèse de doctorat (non publiée), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgique.
21. Delvaux, V. (2006). Production des voyelles nasales en français québécois. XXVIe Journées d'études sur la parole, Dinard pp. 383-386.
22. Delvaux, V. (soumis). Propriétés articulatoires et acoustiques de la nasalité vocalique en français.
23. Delvaux, V., Demolin, D., Soquet, A. et Kingston, J. (2004). La perception des voyelles nasales du français. XXVèmes Journées d'étude sur la parole, Fès, pp. 157-160.
24. Delvaux, V., Metens, T. et Soquet, A. (2002). French nasal vowels: acoustic and articulatory properties. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Denver, 1: 53-56.
25. Demolin, D. et Teston, B. (1998). Aspects aérodynamiques et articulatoires des voyelles nasales du français. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique d'Aix, 18: 47-59.
26. Dickson, D. R. (1962). An acoustic study of nasality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 5: 103-111.
27. Di Cristo, A. (1980). La durée intrinsèque des voyelles du français. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique d'Aix, 7: 211-235.
28. Diehl, R. L., Kluender, K. R. et Walsh, M. A. (1990). Some auditory bases of speech perception and production. Dans: W. A. Ainsworth (dir.), Advances in Speech, Hearing and Language Processing. London: JAI Press, vol.1, pp. 243-267.
29. Diehl, R. L. et Kingston, J. (1991). Phonetic covariation as auditory enhancement: The case of the [+ voice]/[- voice] distinction. Papers from the Conference on Current Phonetic Research Paradigms: Implications for Speech Motor Control, Stockholm University, August, pp. 13-16.
30. Engwall, O., Delvaux, V. et Metens, T. (2006). Interspeaker variation in the articulation of nasal vowels. Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Speech Production, pp. 3-10.
31. Escudier, P. et Schwartz, J.-L. (1985). Pulsation threshold test: evidence for the existence of two biases and discussion of their implications. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78: 463-473.
32. Fant, G. (1960). Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. Mouton: The Hague.
33. Fant, G. (1973). Speech Sounds and Features. Cambridge: MIT Press.
34. Fowler, C. A. (1996). Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99: 1730-1741.
35. Fujimura, O. et Lindqvist, J. (1971). Sweep-tone measurements of vocal-tract characteristics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49: 541-558.
36. Greenberg, J. H., Ferguson, C. A. et Moravcsik, E. A (dir.). (1978). Universals of Human Language, Stanford University Press, 3 vol.
37. Green, D. M. et Swets, J. A. (1966), Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics, New York: Wiley.
38. Hansen, A. B. (1998). Les Voyelles nasales du français parisien moderne: Aspects linguistiques, sociolinguistiques et perceptuels des changements en cours. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanem Press.
39. Hattori, S., Yamamoto, K. et Fujimura, O. (1958). Nasalization of vowels in relation to nasals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 30: 267-274.
40. Hawkins, S. et Stevens, K. N. (1985). Acoustic and perceptual correlates of the non nasal-nasal distinction for vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77: 1560-1575.
41. Holt, L. L., Lotto, A. J. et Kluender, K. R. (2001). Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: A case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109: 764-774.
42. House, A. S. et Stevens, K. N. (1956). Analog studies of the nasalization of vowels. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 21: 218-232.
43. Huffman, M. (1990). The role of F1 amplitude in producing nasal percepts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88: S54.
44. Huffman,M. (1991). Time varying properties of contextually nasalized vowels: Acoustics and perception. Proceedings 12th ICPhSc, Aix-en-Provence, vol.3, pp. 130-133.
45. Jha, S. K. (1986). The nasal vowels in Maithili: An acoustic study. Journal of Phonetics, 14: 223-230.
46. Jusczyk, P. W. (1993). From general to language-specific capacities: The WRAPSA model of how speech perception develops. Journal of Phonetics 21: 3-28.
47. Jusczyk, P. W., Friederici, A. D., Wessels, J. M., Svenkerud, V. Y. et Jusczyk, A. M. (1993). Infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32: 402-420.
48. Kawasaki, H. (1986). Phonetic explanation for phonological universals: the case of distinctive vowel nasalization. Dans: J. J. Ohala et J. J. Jaeger (dir.), New Experimental phonology. York: Academic Press, pp. 81-103.
49. Kent, R. D., Liss, J. et Philips, B. J. (1989). Acoustic analysis of velopharyngeal dysfunction in speech. Dans: K. R. Bzoch (dir.), Communicative disorders related to cleft lip and palate. Boston: College-Hill Press, 3e édition, pp. 258-270.
50. Kingston, J. et Diehl, R. L. (1994). Phonetic knowledge. Language, 70: 419-453.
51. Kingston, J. et Macmillan, N. A. (1995). Integrality of nasalization and F1 in vowels in isolation and before oral and nasal consonants: A detection-theoretic application of the Garner paradigm. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97: 1261-1285.
52. Klatt, D. H. (1980). Software for a Cascade/Parallel Formant Syntheziser. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67: 971-995.
53. Krakow, R. A., Beddor, P. S., Goldstein, L. M. et Fowler, C. (1988). Coarticulatory influences on the perceived height of nasal vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83: 1146-1158.
54. Krakow, R. A. et Beddor, P. S. (1991). Coarticulation and the perception of nasality. Proceedings 12th ICPhS, Aix-en-Provence, vol.5, pp. 38-41.
55. Lindqvist, J. et Sundberg, J. (1976). Acoustic properties of the nasal tract. Phonetica 33: 161-168.
56. Macmillan, N. A. et Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection Theory: A User's Guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Macmillan, N. A., Kingston, J., Thorburn, R., Dickey, A. W. et Bartels, C. (1999). Integrality of nasalization and F1. II Basic sensivity and phonetic labeling measure dinstinct sensory and decision-rule interactions, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106: 2913-2932.
58. Maddieson, I. (2006). Variation in co-variation: The search for explanatory principles. LabPhon 10. Book of abstracts.
59. Maeda, S. (1982). A digital simulation method of the vocal-tract system. Speech Communication, 1: 199-229.
60. Maeda, S. (1993). Acoustics of vowel nasalization and articulatory shifts in French nasal vowels. Dans: M. K. Huffman et R. A. Krakow (dir.), Phonetics and Phonology, vol.5, Nasals, Nasalization and the velum. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 147-167.
61. Martin, P., Beaudoin-Begin, A.-M., Goulet, M.-J. et Roy, J.-P. (2001). Les voyelles nasales en français du Québec. La Linguistique 37: 49-70.
62. Martinet, A. (1945). La Prononciation du français contemporain: témoignages recueillis en 1941 dans un camp d'officiers prisonniers Genève: Droz.
63. Ménard, L., Schwartz, J.-L., Boë, L.-J., Kandel, S. et Vallée, N. (2002). Auditory normalization of French vowels synthesized by an articulatory model simulating growth from birth to adulthood. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111: 1892-1905.
64. Morin, Y-C. (1994). Quelques réflexions sur la formation des voyelles nasales en français. Dans: R. Van Deyck (dir.), Diachronie et variation linguistique. Gent: Communication et Cognition, pp. 27-109.
65. Nève, F.-X. (1984)L Auquin doute: Un parfum brun s'en va...: la disparition du phonème /_o_tie/ en français contemporain. Le Français Moderne, 52: 98-219.
66. Ohala, J. J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. Papers from a Parasession on Language and Behavior, Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 178-203.
67. Ohala, J. J. (1986). Phonological evidence for top-down processing in speech perception. Dans: J. S. Perkell et D. H. Klatt (dir.), Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, pp. 386-397.
68. Oliveira, C. et Teixeira, A. (2007). On gestures timing in european Portuguese nasals. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. pp. 405-408.
69. Repp, B. H. (1982). Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 2: 81-110.
70. Ruhlen, M. (1975). Patterning of nasal vowels. Dans: C. Ferguson, L. Hyman, et J. J. Ohala (dir.), Nasalfest: Papers from a Symposium on Nasals and Nasalization. Stanford University: Department of Linguistics, pp. 333-351.
71. Schwartz, J. L. et Escudier, P. (1987). Does the human auditory system include large-scale spectral integration? Dans: M.E.H. Schouten (dir.), The Psychophysics of Speech Perception. Nato Asi Series, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 284-292.
72. Stevens, K. (1998). Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, MIT Press.
73. Straka, G. (1979). Remarques sur les voyelles nasales, leur origine et leur évolution en français. Les sons et les mots, Choix d'études de phonétique et de linguistique, Paris: Klincksieck, pp. 501-531.
74. Takeuchi, S., Kasuya, H. et Kido, K. (1975). On the acoustic correlate of nasality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 31: 298-309.
75. Teixeira, A., Vaz, F. et Príncipe, J. C. (1999). Influence of dynamics in the perceived naturalness of Portuguese nasal vowels. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.
76. Vihman, M. M. et de Boysson-Bardies, B. (1994). The nature and origins of ambient language influence on infant vocal production and early words. Phonetica, 51: 159-169.
77. Walter, H. (1977). La Phonologie du français. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
78. Walter, H. (1994). Variétés actuelles des voyelles nasales du français. Dans: R. Van Deyck (dir.), Diachronie et variation linguistique. Gent: Communication et cognition, (coll. Studies in Language), pp. 223-236.
79. Whalen,D. H. et Beddor, P. S. (1989). Connections between nasality and vowel duration and height: Elucidation of the Eastern Algonquian intrusive nasal. Language, 65: 457-486.
80. Wright, J. T. (1986). The behavior of nasalized vowels in the perceptual vowel space. Dans: J. J. Ohala et J. J. Jaeger (dir.), Experimental Phonology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 45-67.
81. Young, F. W. et Hamer, R. M. (1979). Multi-dimensional scaling: history, theory and applications. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
82. Young, F. W. et Harris, D. F. (1990). Multidimensional Scaling: Procedure ALSCAL, SPSS Base System User's Guide, pp. 396-472.
83. Zerling, J.-P. (1984). Phénomènes de nasalité et de nasalisation vocaliques: Etude cinéradiographique pour deux locuteurs. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique de Strasbourg, 16: 241-266.