Evaluating the accuracy and impact of registration in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI

Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 106-120

  Hill, Andrew ^a   Mehnert, Andrew ^a   Crozier, Stuart ^a   McMahon, Kerry ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b GREENSLOPES PRIVATE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biomechanical modeling; Breast MRI; Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; Enhancement curve; Registration

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649884755     PISSN: 15525031     EISSN: 1552504X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.b.20133     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Padhani AR, Ah-See MLW, Makris A. 2005. MRI in the detection and management of breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 5:239-252.
2. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, Schild HH. 1999. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211:101-110.
3. Kuhl CK. 2005. Dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging. In: Morris E, Liberman L, eds. Breast MRI: Diagnosis and Intervention. New York: Springer.pp 79-139.
4. Zitova B, Flusser J. 2003. Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vis Comput 21:977-1000.
5. Pluim JPW, Maintz JBA, Viergever MA. 2004. f-information measures in medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23:1508-1516.
6. Fei BW, Duerk JL, Sodee DB, Wilson DL. 2005. Semiautomatic nonrigid registration for the prostate and pelvic MR volumes. Acad Radiol 12:815-824.
7. Yujun G, Jasjit S, Sivaramakrishna R. 2005. Image registration for breast imaging: a review. In: 27th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Shanghai, pp3379-3382.
8. Sorzano COS, Thevenaz P, Unser M. 2005. Elastic registration of biological images using vector-spline regularization. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52:652-663.
9. Cordon O, Damas S. 2006. Image registration with iterated local search. J Heuristics 12:73-94.
10. Pekar V, Gladilin E, Rohr K. 2006. An adaptive irregular grid approach for 3D deformable image registration. Phys Med Biol 51:361-377.
11. Sorzano COS, Thevenaz P, Unser M. 2005. Elastic registration of biological, images using vector-spline regularization. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52:652-663.
12. Denton ERE, Sonoda LI, Rueckert D, Rankin SC, Hayes C, Leach MO, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ. 1999. Comparison and evaluation of rigid, affine, and nonrigid registration of breast MR images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:800-805.
13. Hayton PM, Brady M, Smith SM, Moore N. 1999. A non-rigid registration algorithm for dynamic breast MR images. Artif Intell 114:125-156.
14. Schestowitz R, Twining CJ, Cootes T, Petrovic VA, Taylor CJ, Crum WR. 2006. Assessing the accuracy of non-rigid registration with and without ground truth. In: Third IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, Arlington, VA, pp 836-839.
15. Schnabel JA, Tanner C, Castellano-Smith AD, Degenhard A, Leach MO, Hose DR, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ. 2003. Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22:238-247.
16. Orel SG, Schnall MD. 2001. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220:13-30.
17. Mester R. 2005. Special issue on advanced aspects of motion estimation. Signal Process Image Commun 20:503-509.
18. Pluim JPW, Maintz JBA, Viergever MA. 2003. Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22:986-1004.
19. Hutton BF, Braun M. 2003. Software for image registration: algorithms, accuracy, efficacy. Seminars Nucl Med 33:180-192.
20. Buonaccorsi GA, Roberts C, Cheung S, Watson Y, O'Connor JPB, Davies K, Jackson A, Jayson GC, Parker GJM. 2006. Comparison of the performance of tracer kinetic model-driven registration for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using different models of contrast enhancement. Acad Radiol 13:1112-1123.
21. Chen WJ, Giger ML, Bick U, Newstead GM. 2006. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Med Phys 33:2878-2887.
22. Samani A, Bishop J, Yaffe MJ, Plewes DB. 2001. Biomechanical 3-D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:271-279.
23. Tanner C, Schnabel JA, Degenhard A, Castellano-Smith AD, Hayes C, Leach MO, Hose DR, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ. 2002. Validation of volume-preserving non-rigid registration: application to contrastenhanced MR-mammography. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv MICCAI 2488 (Part 1):307-314.
24. Tanner C, Degenhard A, Schnabel JA, Castellano-Smith AD, Hayes C, Sonoda LI, Leach MO, Hose DR, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ. 2002. Comparison of biomechanical breast models: a case study. SPIE: Med Imaging Image Process 4684:1807-1818.
25. Cohen LD. 1991. On active contour models and balloons. CVGIP: Image Underst 53:211-218.
26. Mathworks. 2006. Matlab 2.3.0. MA: The Math-Works Inc.
27. COMSOL. Multiphisics 3.2. MA: COMSOL Inc.
28. Tanner C, Schnabel JA, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ, Leach MO, Hose DR. 2006. Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models. Med Phys 33:1758-1769.
29. Xydeas T, Siegmann K, Sinkus R, Krainick-Strobel U, Miller S, Claussen CD. 2005. Magnetic resonance elastography of the breast-correlation of signal intensity data with viscoelastic properties. Invest Radiol 40:412-420.
30. Rohlfing T, Maurer CR, Bluemke DA, Jacobs MA. 2003. Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22:730-741.
31. Leung C. 2005. Efficient Methods for 3D Reconstruction from Multiple Images. PhD Thesis. Brisbane: University of Queensland.
32. Hill A, Mehnert A, Crozier S, Leung C, Wilson S, McMahon K, Kennedy D. 2006. Dynamic breast MRI: image registration and its impact on enhancement curve estimation. In: 28th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, IEEE-EMBS 2006, New York, NY, pp 3049-3052.
33. Taha HA. 2002. Operations Research. London: Collier MacMillan
34. Robinson D, Milanfar P. 2004. Fundamental performance limits in image registration. IEEE Trans Image Process 13:1185-1199.
35. Tofts PS, Berkowitz B, Schnall MD. 1995. Quantitative-analysis of dynamic Gd-Dtpa enhancement in breast-tumors using a permeability model. Magn Reson Med 33:564-568.