A non-rigid registration algorithm for dynamic breast MR images

Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 114, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 125-156

  Hayton, Paul M ^a   Brady, Michael ^a   Smith, Stephen M ^b   Moore, Niall ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

2D motion estimation; Contrast enhanced MRI; Correlation; Optic flow; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003202690     PISSN: 00043702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0004-3702(99)00073-9     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. J.L. Barron, D.J. Fleet, S.S. Beauchemin, Performance of optical flow techniques, Internat. J. Computer Vision 12 (1) (1994) 43-77.
2. M. Bro-Nielsen, Medical image registration and surgery simulation, Ph.D. Thesis, Deptartment of Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, 1996.
3. G.E. Christensen, R.D. Rabbitt, M.I. Miller, 3D brain mapping using a deformable neuroanatomy, Physics in Medicine and Biology 39 (1994) 609-618.
4. S. Ciatto, L. Cataliotti, V. Distante, Nonpalpable lesions detected by mammography: Review of 512 consecutive cases, Radiology 165 (1987) 99-102.
5. J. Declerck, G. Subsol, J.P. Thirion, N. Ayache, Automatic retrieval of anatomical structures in 3D medical images, Technical Report, INRIA, 1995.
6. J. Declerck, G. Subsol, J.P. Thirion, N. Ayache, Automatic retrieval of anatomical structures in 3d medical images, in: N. Ayache (Ed.), First International Conference on Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine, CVRMed-95, Nice, France, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, 1995.
7. F. Devernay, Vision stéréoscopique et propriétés différentielles des surfaces, Ph.D. Thesis, L'École Polytechnique, 1997.
8. J. Esteve, A. Kricker, J. Ferlay, D.M. Parkin, Facts and figures of cancer in the european community, Technical Report, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 1993.
9. S. Feig, Breast masses: Mammographic and sonographic evaluation, Radiol. Clin. North Amer. 30 (1992) 67-92.
10. S. Gong, M. Brady, Parallel computation of optic flow, in: O. Faugeras (Ed.), European Conference on Computer Vision I, Springer, Berlin, 1990, pp. 124-133.
11. R. Guillemaud, M. Brady, Enhancement of mr images, in: K.H. Höhne, R. Kikinis (Eds.), Visualisation in Biomedical Computation (VBC-96), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1131, Springer, Berlin, 1996, pp. 107-116.
12. P.M. Hayton, Analysis of contrast-enhanced breast MR images, Ph.D. Thesis, Oxford University, Department of Engineering, Oxford, 1998.
13. S.H. Heywang-Koebrunner, Nonmammographic breast imaging techniques, Current Opinions in Radiology 4 (1992) 146-154.
14. R.P. Highnam, M. Brady, Mammographic Image Processing, Kluwer Series in Computer Vision, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998.
15. E.C. Hildreth, Computations underlying the measurement of visual motion, Artificial Intelligence 23 (1984) 309-354.
16. B.K.P. Horn, B.G. Schunck, Determining optical flow, Artificial Intelligence 17 (1981) 185-203.
17. D. Ikeda, I. Anderson, Ductal carcinoma in situ: Atypical mammographic appearances, Radiology 172 (1989) 661-666.
18. V. Jackson, K. Dines, L. Bassett, R. Gold, H. Reynolds, Diagnostic importance of the radiographic density of noncalcified breast masses: Analysis of 91 lesions, Amer. J. Rentgenology 157 (1991) 25-28.
19. J.B.A. Maintz, M.A. Viergever, A survey of medical image registration, Medical Image Analysis 2 (1) (1998) 1-36.
20. H.-H. Nagel, On the estimation of optic flow: Relations between different approaches and some new results, Artificial Intelligence 33 (1987) 299-324.
21. H.-H. Nagel, Extending the 'oriented smoothness constraint' into the temporal domain and the estimation of derivatives of optical flow, in: Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision I, 1990, pp. 139-148.
22. B. Porter, V. Taylor, J. Smith, V. Tsao, Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography, Acad. Radiology 1 (3) (1994) S36-S46.
23. P. Pretorius, P. Hayton, N. Moore, M. Brady, A clinical assessment of the use of a model of contrast enhancement for analysis of dynamic MR breast images, in: Proc. Medical Image Understanding and Analysis '97, 1997, pp. 57-60.
24. P. Pretorius, N. Moore, P. Hayton, M. Brady, The use of compression during MR imaging of the breast to demonstrate elasticity variation between different tissues and lesions, in: Imaging: Abstracts from Symposium Mammographicum '98, Vol. 10(1), York, Science Technology and Letters, 1998.
25. E. Sickles, Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers, Amer. J. Rentgenology 146 (1986) 661-663.
26. E. Simoncelli, E. Adelson, D. Heeger, Probability distributions of optical flow, in: CVPR, Hawaii, Inst. Elec. Eng., 1991, pp. 310-315.
27. S.M. Smith, ASSET-2: Real-time motion segmentation and object tracking, Internal Technical Report TR95SMS2, Defence Research Agency, Chobham Lane, Chertsey, Surrey, UK, 1995. Available at www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/∼steve for downloading.
28. S.M. Smith, J.M. Brady, ASSET-2: Real-time motion segmentation and shape tracking, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 17 (8) (1995) 814-820.
29. C. Studholme, Measures of 3D medical image alignment, Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, 1997.
30. J. Thirion, Fast non-rigid matching of 3D medical images, Technical Report 2547, INRIA, 1995.
31. B.C. Vemuri, H. Shuangying, D. Sahni, C. Leonard, C. Mohr, R. Gilmore, J. Fitzsimmons, An effcient motion estimator with application to medical image registration, Medical Image Analysis 2 (1) (1998) 79-98.
32. P. Viola, W. Wells, Alignment by maximization of mutual information, in: IEEE Computer Society (Ed.), ICCV, 1995, pp. 16-23.
33. W.M. Wells III, W.E.L. Grimson, R. Kikinis, F.A. Jolesz, Adaptive segmentation of MRI data, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging 15 (4) (1996) 429-442.
34. W.M. Wells III, P. Viola, H. Atsumi, S. Nakajima, R. Kikinis, Multi-model volume registration by maximization of mutual information, Medical Image Analysis 1 (1) (1996) 35-51.