Must judgments about intentionality precede dispositional inference?

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 66-72

  Read, Stephen J ^a   Monroe, Brian M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649847817     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10478400902794571     Document Type: Note

References (19)

1. Abelson, R. P., & Lalljee, M. (1988). Knowledge structures and causal explanation. In D. J. Hilton (Ed.), Contemporary science and natural explanation: Commonsense conceptions of causality (pp. 175-203). New York: New York University Press.
2. Abelson, R. P., Leddo, J., & Gross, P. H. (1987). The strength of conjunctive explanations.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13(2), 141-155.
3. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.
4. Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10(2), 83-109.
5. Lalljee, M., Lamb, R., & Abelson, R. P. (1992). The role of event prototypes in categorization and explanation. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology, Vol. 3 (pp. 153-182). Oxford, England: Wiley & Sons.
6. Leddo, J., Abelson, R. P., & Gross, P. H. (1984). Conjunctive explanations: When two reasons are better than one.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5), 933-943.
7. McClure, J., Lalljee, M., Jaspars, J., & Abelson, R. P. (1989). Conjunctive explanations of success and failure: The effect of different types of causes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 19-26.
8. Malle, B. F. (2004). How the mind explains behavior: Folk explanations, meaning, and social interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Miller, L. C., & Read, S. J. (1991). On the coherence of mental models of persons and relationships: A knowledge structure approach. In G. J. O. Fletcher & F. Fincham (Eds.), Cognition in close relationships (pp. 69-99). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Pennington, N.,& Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluationin complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242-258.
11. Read, S. J. (1987). Constructing causal scenarios: A knowledge structure approach to causal reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 288-302.
12. Read, S. J. (1988). Conjunctive explanations: The effect of a comparison between a chosen and a nonchosen alternative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 146-162.
13. Read, S. J., & Marcus-Newhall, A. R. (1993). Explanatory coherence in social explanations: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 429-447.
14. Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (1993). Rapist or "regular guy": Explanatory coherence in the construction of mental models of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 526-540.
15. Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (1998). On the dynamic construction of meaning: An interactive activation and competition model of social perception. In S. J. Read & L. C. Miller (Eds.), Connectionist models of social reasoning and behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (2005). Explanatory coherence and goalbased knowledge structures in making dispositional inferences. In B. Malle & S. Hodges (Eds.), Other minds (pp. 124-139). New York: Guilford.
17. Read, S. J., Vanman, E. J., & Miller, L. C. (1997). Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes and Gestalt principles: (Re) introducing cognitive dynamics to social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 26-53.
18. Reeder, G. D., Hesson-McInnis, M., Krohse, J. O., & Scialabba, E. A. (2001). Inferences about effort and ability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1225-1235.
19. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Oxford, England: Erlbaum.