Inferences about effort and ability

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2001, Pages 1225-1235

  Reeder, Glenn D ^a   Hesson McInnis, Mathew ^b   Krohse, Joshua O ^b   Scialabba, Elizabeth A ^b  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035538342     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201279014     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson, N. H., & Butzin, C. A. (1974). Performance = motivation × ability: An integration-theoretical analyysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 598-604.
2. Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
3. Asch, S. E., & Zukier, H. (1984). Thinking about persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1230-1240.
4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5. Fein, S. (1996). Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1164-1184.
6. Fleming, J. H. (1994) Multiple-audience problems, tactical communication, and social interaction: A relational-regulation perspective. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 26) (pp. 215-292). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7. Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 89-150). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
8. Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
9. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York; John Wiley.
10. Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: Freeman.
11. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.
12. Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
13. Krull, D. S., & Erickson, D.J. (1995). Inferential hopscotch: How people draw social inferences from behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 35-38.
14. Kunda, Z. (1998). Parallel processing in person perception: Implications for two-stage models of attribution. InJ. M. Darley & J. Cooper (Eds.), Attribution and social interaction: The legacy of Edward E. Jones (pp. 115-126). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Malle, B. F. (1999). How people explain behavior: A new theoretical framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 21-43.
16. Malle, B. F., Knobe, J., O'Laughlin, M.J., Pearce, G. E., & Nelson, S. E. (2000). Conceptual structure and social functions of behavior explanations: Beyond person-situation attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 309-326.
17. McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.
18. McClure, J. (1998). Discounting causes of behavior: Are two reasons better than one? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 7-20.
19. McClure, J., & Hilton, D. (1998). Are goals or preconditions better explanations? It depends on the question. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 897-911.
20. Morris, M. W., & Larrick, R. P. (1995). When one cause casts doubt on another: A normative analysis of discounting in causal attribution. Psychological Review, 102, 331-355.
21. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1985). Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
22. Read, S. J. (1987). Constructing causal scenarios: A knowledge structure approach to causal reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 288-302.
23. Read, S. J., & Marcus-Newhall, A. (1993). Explanatory coherence in social explanations: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 429-447.
24. Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (1993). Rapist or "regular guy": Explanatory coherence in the construction of mental models about others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 526-541.
25. Reeder, G. D. (1997). Dispositional inferences of ability: Content and process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 171-189.
26. Reeder G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61-79.
27. Reeder, G. D., & Fulks, J. L. (1980). When actions speak louder than words: Implicational schemata and the attribution of ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 33-46.
28. Reeder, G. D., & Spores, J. M. (1983). The attribution of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 736-745.
29. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
30. Trafimow, D. (1997). The implications of success for hierarchically and partially restrictive ability dimensions. Social Cognition, 15, 312-326.
31. Trafimow, D. (1998). Situation-specific effects in person memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 314-321.
32. Trafimow, D., & Schneider, D. J. (1994). The effects of behavioral, situational, and person information on different attribution judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 351-369.
33. Trafimow, D., & Trafimow, S. (1999). Mapping perfect and imperfect duties onto hierarchically and partially restrictive trait dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 686-695.
34. Trope, Y. (1998). Dispositional bias in person-perception: A hypothesis-testing perspective. In J. M. Darley & J. Cooper (Eds.), Attribution and social interaction: The legacy of Edward E. Jones (pp. 67-97). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35. Vonk, R. (1999). Effects of outcome dependency on correspondence bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 382-389.
36. Vonk, R. (1999). Impression formation and impression management Motives, traits, and likability inferred from self-promoting and self-deprecating behavior. Social Cognition, 17, 390-412.
37. Vonk, R., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1994). The sovereignty of negative inference: Suspicion of ulterior motives does not reduce the negativity effect. Social Cognition, 12, 169-186.
38. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and achievement. New York: Springer-Verlag.