Interrelationships between meat quality traits, texture measurements and physicochemical characteristics of M. rectus abdominis from Charolais heifers

Meat Science

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 293-301

  Oury, M P ^a   Picard, B ^b   Briand, M ^c   Blanquet, J P ^a   Dumont, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c CUST   (France)

Author keywords

Beef; Charolais; Heifer; M. rectus abdominis; Meat; Quality

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 67649839931     PISSN: 03091740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ansay M. Individualité musculaire chez le bovin: Étude de l'équipement enzymatique de quelques muscles. Annales de Biologie Animale, Biochimie, Biophysique 14 (1974) 471-486
2. Arthur P.F. Double muscling in cattle: A review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14 (1995) 471-486
3. Bèche, J. M. (1996). Pointage au sevrage des bovins de race à viande. Compte-rendu No. 2495. Institut de l'Élevage (Ed).
4. Beer, M. F. (2003). What affects the quality of Australian beef? In Proceedings of the beef products (pp. 147-151). Program: Technology - Our Future, Tocal College, Paterson, Australia, 13th May 2003.
5. Belew J.B., Brooks J.C., McKenna D.R., and Savell J.W. Warner-Bratzler shear evaluation of 40 bovine muscles. Meat Science 64 (2003) 507-512
6. Bergman I., and Loxley R. Two improved and simplified methods for the spectrophotometric determination of hydroxyproline. Analytical Chemistry 35 (1963) 1961-1965
7. Bernard C., Cassar-Malek I., Le Cunff M., Dubroeucq H., Renand G., and Hocquette J.F. New indicators of beef sensory quality revealed by expression of specific genes. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 55 (2007) 5229-5237
8. Bonnet M., and Kopp J. Préparation des échantillons pour le dosage et la caractérisation qualitative du collagène musculaire. Viandes et Productions Carnés 13 (1992) 87-91
9. Bouton P.E., Ford A., Harris P.V., and Ratcliff D. Objective-subjective assessment of meat tenderness. Journal of Texture Studies 6 (1975) 315-328
10. Brackebush S.A., McKeith F.K., Carr T.R., and McLaren D.G. Relationship between longissimus composition and the composition of other major muscles of the beef carcass. Journal of Animal Science 69 (1991) 631-640
11. Bradford M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72 (1976) 248-254
12. Briand M., Tamant A., Briand Y., Monin G., and Durand B. Metabolic types of muscle in the sheep: I myosin ATPase glycolytic and mitochondrial enzyme activities. European Journal of Applied Physiology 46 (1981) 347-358
13. Campion D.R., and Crouse J.D. Predictive value of USDA beef quality grade factors for cooked meat palatability. Journal of Food Science 40 (1975) 1125-1128
14. Cassar-Malek I., Ueda Y., Bernard C., Jurie C., Sudre K., and Listrat A. Molecular and biochemical muscle characteristics of Charolais bulls divergently selected for muscle growth. In: Hocquette J.F., and Gigli S. (Eds). Indicators of milk and beef quality (2005), Wageningen Academic Publishers, EAAP Publ. 112, Wageningen, The Netherlands 371-377
15. Cassar-Malek I., Hocquette J.F., Jurie C., Listrat A., Jailler R., Bauchart D., et al. Muscle-specific metabolic, histochemical and biochemical responses to a nutritionally induced discontinuous growth path. Animal Science 79 (2004) 49-59
16. Cepin, S., Cepon, M., & Skorjanc, D., (1992). Influence of growth and carcass weight on carcass and meat characteristics of Brown Bulls. In 38th International congress of meat science and technology, Clermont-Ferrand, France (Vol. 9, p. 12).
17. Chambaz A., Scheeder M.R.L., Kreuzer M., and Dufey P.A. Meat quality of Angus, Simmental, Charolais and Limousin steers compared at the same intra-muscular fat content. Meat Science 63 (2003) 491-500
18. Crouse J.D., Cross H.R., and Seideman S.C. Effects of sex condition, genotype, diet and carcass electrical stimulation on the collagen content and palatability of two bovine muscles. Journal of Animal Science 60 (1985) 1228-1234
19. Crouse J.D., Koohmaraie M., and Seideman S.D. The relationship of muscle fibre size to tenderness of beef. Meat Science 30 (1991) 295-302
20. Destefanis G., Barge M.T., Brugiapaglia A., and Tassone S. The use of principal component analysis (PCA) to characterize beef. Meat Science 56 (2000) 225-259
21. Dransfield E., Martin J.F., Bauchart D., Abouelkaram S., Lepetit J., Culioli J., et al. Meat quality and composition of three muscles from French cull cows and young bulls. Animal Science 76 (2003) 387-399
22. Dransfield E., Nute G.R., and Francombe M.A. Comparison of eating quality of bull and steer beef. Animal Production 39 (1984) 37-50
23. Fiems L.O., De Campeneere D., De Smet S., Van de Voorde G., Vanacker J.M., and Boucqué C.V. Relationship between fat depots in carcasses of beef bulls and effect on meat color and tenderness. Meat Science 56 (2000) 41-47
24. Gregory K.E., Cundiff L.V., and Koch R.M. Genetic and phenotypic (co)variances for growth and carcass traits of purebred and composite populations of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73 (1995) 1920-1926
25. Gregory K.E., Cundiff L.V., Koch R.M., Dikeman M.E., and Koohmaraie M. Breed effects, retained heterosis, and estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters for carcass and meat traits of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 72 (1994) 1174-1183
26. Hocquette J.F., Barnola I., Jurie C., Cassar-Malek I., Bauchart D., Picard B., et al. Relation entre teneur en lipides intramusculaires et différents marqueurs du type de fibres musculaires chez les taurillons Charolais sélectionnés sur le potentiel de croissance musculaire. Rencontres Recherches Ruminants 11 (2004) 91-94
27. Hocquette J.F., Lehnert S., Barendse W., Cassar-Malek I., and Picard B. Recent advances in cattle functional genomics and their application to beef quality. Animal 1 (2007) 159-173
28. Hocquette J.F., Ortigue-Marty I., Pethick D.W., Herpin P., and Fernandez X. Nutritional and hormonal regulation of energy metabolism in skeletal muscles of meat-producing animals. Livestock Production Science 56 (1998) 115-143
29. Hopkins D.L., and Thompson J.M. Factors contributing to proteolysis and disruption of myofibrillar proteins and the impact on tenderisation in beef and sheep meat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53 (2002) 149-166
30. Jeremiah L.E., Dugan M.E.R., Aalhus J.L., and Gibson L.L. Assessment of the relationship between chemical components and palatability of major beef muscles and muscle groups. Meat Science 65 (2003) 1013-1019
31. Jurie C., Ortigues-Marty I., Picard B., Micol D., and Hocquette J.F. The separate effects of the nature of diet and grazing mobility on metabolic potential of muscles from Charolais steers. Livestock Science 104 (2006) 182-192
32. Laemmli U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of the bacteriophage TA. Nature 227 (1970) 680-685
33. Lorenzen C.L., Miller R.K., Taylor J.F., Neely T.R., Tatum J.D., Wise J.W., et al. Beef Customer Satisfaction: Trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force values. Journal of Animal Science 81 (2003) 143-149
34. Maher S.C., Mullen A.M., Moloney A.P., Drennan M.J., Buckley D.J., and Jerry J.P. Colour, composition and eating quality of beef from the progeny of two Charolais sires. Meat Science 67 (2004) 73-80
35. Maltin C., Balcerzak D., Tilley R., and Delday M. Determinants of meat quality: Tenderness. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 62 (2003) 337-347
36. Micol, D., Berge, P., Dozias, D., Lepetit, J., Lienard, G., Picard, B., et al., (1992). Effect of pregnancy and calving on muscle characteristics in cattle (pp. 93-96). In 38th International congress of meat science and technology, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
37. NF 04-402 (1968). Viandes et produits à base de viande - Détermination de la teneur en matière grasse totale.
38. Ockerman H.W., Jaworek D., Van Stavern B., Parrett N., and Pierson C.J. Castration and sire effects on carcass traits, meat palatability and muscle fiber characteristics in Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 59 (1984) 981-990
39. Ouali A., Sentendreu M.A., Aubry L., Boudjellal A., Tassy C., Geesink G.H., et al. Meat toughness as affected by muscle type. In: Hocquette J.F., and Gigli S. (Eds). Indicators of milk and beef quality (2005), Wageningen Academic Publishers, EAAP Publ. 112, Wageningen, The Netherlands 391-395
40. Oury, M. P., Jurie, C., Hocquette, J. F., & Picard, B. (2007). Inter-muscular variability of metabolic properties of bovine muscle fibres. In Second international symposium on energy and protein metabolism and nutrition, Vichy, France, 9-12 September 2007.
41. Peachey B.M., Purchas R.W., and Duizer L.M. Relationships between sensory and objective measures of meat tenderness of beef M. Longissimus thoracis from bulls and steers. Meat Science 60 (2002) 211-218
42. Picard B., Duris M.P., and Jurie J. Classification of bovine muscle fibres by different histochemical techniques. Histochemical Journal 30 (1998) 473-479
43. Picard, B., Oury, M. P., Jurie, C., Cassar-Malek, I., & Hocquette, J. F. (2004). Variabilité inter-musculaire des propriétés contractiles et métaboliques de muscles de bovins. In Premier congrès de la société française de nutrition, Clermont-Ferrand (Vol. 39, p. 70) 17-19 November 2003. Cahier de Nutrition et Diététique.
44. Picard B., Robelin J., and Geay Y. Influence of castration and postnatal energy restriction on the contractile and metabolic characteristics of bovine muscle. Annales de Zootechnie 44 (1995) 347-357
45. Piot C., Veerkamp J.H., Bauchart D., and Hocquette J.F. Contribution of mitochondria and peroxisomes to palmitate oxidation in rat and bovine tissues. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 121 (1998) 69-78
46. Renand, G., Larzul, C., Le Bihan-Duval, E., & Le Roy, P. (2002). L'amélioration génétique de la qualité de la viande dans les différentes espèces: Situation actuelle et perspectives à court et moyen terme (pp.91-104). In 9èmes journées des sciences du muscle et technologies de la viande, Viande et produits Carnés Hors-Série.
47. Renand G., Picard B., Touraille C., Berge P., and Lepetit J. Relationships between muscle characteristics and meat quality traits of young Charolais bulls. Meat Science 59 (2001) 49-60
48. Rhee M.S., Wheeler T.L., Shackelford S.D., and Koohmaraie M. Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among 11 beef muscles. Journal of Animal Science 82 (2004) 534-550
49. Robert N., Briand M., Taylor R., and Briand Y. The effect of proteasome on myofibrillar structures in bovine skeletal muscle. Meat Science 51 (1999) 149-153
50. Salé P. Evolution de quelques propriétés mécaniques du muscle pendant la maturation. Bulletin Technique C.R.Z.V. Theix, INRA 6 (1971) 35-44
51. SAS Institute Inc. (2002). SAS user's guide, Statistics (Version 9.1). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
52. Seideman S.C., Crouse J.D., and Cross H.R. The effect of sex condition and growth implants on bovine muscle fiber characteristics. Meat Science 17 (1986) 79-95
53. Serra X., Gil M., Gispert M., Guerrero L., Oliver M.A., Sanudo C., et al. Characterisation of young bulls of the Bruna dels Pirineus cattle breed in relation to carcass, meat quality and biochemical traits. Meat Science 66 (2004) 425-436
54. Shackelford S.D., Wheeler T.L., and Koohmaraie M. Relationships between shear force and sensory panel ratings of 10 major muscles from Bos indicus and Bos Taurus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73 (1995) 3333-3340
55. Shackelford S.D., Wheeler T.L., and Koohmaraie M. Evaluation of slice shear force as an objective method of assessing beef longissimus tenderness. Journal of Animal Science 77 (1999) 2693-2699
56. Silva J.A., Patarata L., and Martins C. Influence of ultimate pH on bovine meat tenderness during ageing. Meat Science 52 (1999) 453-459
57. Strydom P.E., Naude R.T., Smith M.F., Scholtz M.M., and Van Wyk J.B. Characterisation of indigenous African cattle breeds in relation to meat quality traits. Meat Science 55 (2000) 79-88
58. Sudre K., Cassar-Malek I., Listrat A., Ueada Y., Leroux C., Jurie C., et al. Biochemical and transcriptomic analysis of two bovine skeletal muscles in Charolais bulls divergently selected for muscle growth. Meat Science 70 (2005) 267-277
59. Therkildsen M., Melchior Larsen L., Bang H.G., and Vestergaard M. Effect of growth rate on tenderness development and final tenderness of meat from Friesian calves. Animal Science 74 (2002) 253-264
60. Thompson, J., Polkinghorne, R., Watson, R., Gee A., & Murison, B. (1999). Meat Standards Australie, a 'PACCP' based beef grading scheme for consumers. In 45th International congress of meat science and technology, Japan, Yokohama.
61. Whipple G., Koohmaraie M., Dikeman M.E., and Crouse J.D. Predicting beef-longissimus tenderness from various biochemical and histological muscle traits. Journal of Animal Science 68 (1990) 4193-4199
62. Young O.A., and Davey C.L. Electrophoretic analysis of proteins from single bovine muscle fibres. Biochemical Journal 195 (1981) 317-327