Assessment of physical functioning: A conceptual model encompassing environmental factors and individual compensation strategies

Physical Therapy

Volumn 89, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 705-714

  Tomey, Kristin M ^a   Sowers, MaryFran R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH STATISTICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; REVIEW; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHYSICAL FITNESS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649831889     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20080213     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1-14. (Pubitemid 124019662)
2. Royall DR, Lauterbach EC, Kaufer D, et al; Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. The cognitive correlates of functional status: a review from the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007;19:249-265.
3. Wolinsky FD, Miller DK, Andresen EM, et al. Effect of subclinical status in functional limitation and disability on adverse health outcomes 3 years later. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:101-106. (Pubitemid 46931555)
4. Stevens JA, Olson S. Reducing falls and resulting hip fractures among older women. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2000;49(RR-2): 3-12.
5. Schieman S, Plickert G. Functional limitations and changes in levels of depression among older adults: a multiple-hierarchy stratification perspective. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007;62:S36-S42. (Pubitemid 46917103)
6. Fried TR, Bradley EH, Williams C, Tinetti ME. Functional disability and health care expenditures for older persons. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:2602-2607.
7. Ervin RB. Prevalence of functional limitations among adults 60 years of age and over: United States, 1999-2002. Adv Data. 2006;375:1-7.
8. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Available at: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/site/index.cfm. Accessed May 2, 2008.
9. Jette AM. Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Phys Ther. 2006;86:726-734.
10. Schootman M, Andresen EM, Wolinsky FD, et al. Neighborhood conditions and risk of incident lower-body functional limitations among middle-aged African Americans. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:450-458.
11. Balfour JL, Kaplan GA. Neighborhood environment and loss of physical function in older adults; evidence from the Alameda County Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2002; 155:507-515. (Pubitemid 34208042)
12. Dixon RA, Bäckman L. Concepts of compensation: integrated, differentiated and Janus-faced. In: Dixon RA, Bäckman L, eds. Compensating for Psychological Deficits and Declines: Managing Losses and Promoting Gains. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1995:3-19
13. Fried LP, Bandeen-Roche K, Williamson JD, et al. Functional decline in older adults: expanding methods of ascertainment. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1996;51:M206-M214. (Pubitemid 27369256)
14. Fried LP, Young Y, Rubin G, Bandeen-Roche K; WHAS II Collaborative Research Group. Self-reported preclinical disability identifies older women with early declines in performance and early disease. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:889-901. (Pubitemid 32755781)
15. Hoenig H, Ganesh SP, Taylor DH Jr, et al. Lower extremity physical performance and use of compensatory strategies for mobility. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:262-269.
16. West SK, Munoz B, Rubin GS, et al. Compensatory strategy use identifies risk of incident disability for the visually impaired. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1242-1247. (Pubitemid 41316741)
17. Baltes PB, Baltes MM, eds. Successful Aging: Perspectives From the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
18. Agree EM. The influence of personal care and assistive devices on the measurement of disability. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:427-443. (Pubitemid 29023276)
19. Keysor J, Jette AM, Haley SM. Development of the Home and Community Environment (HACE) instrument. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:37-44. (Pubitemid 40214507)
20. Gignac MA, Cott C, Badley EM. Adaptation to disability: applying selective optimization with compensation to the behaviors of older adults with osteoarthritis. Psychol Aging. 2002;17:520-524. (Pubitemid 35013291)
21. Bucks RS, Ashworth DL, Wilcock GK, Siegfried K. Assessment of activities of daily living in dementia: development of the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale. Age Ageing. 1996;25:113-120. (Pubitemid 26091163)
22. Kielhofner G, Burke JP, Igi CH. A model of human occupation, part 4: assessment and intervention. Am J Occup Ther. 1980;34: 777-788. (Pubitemid 11176335)
23. Townsend E, ed. Enabling Occupation: An Occupational Therapy Perspective. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists Publications ACE; 2002.
24. Story MF, Mueller JL, Mace RL. The Universal Design File: Designing for People of All Ages and Abilities. Rev ed. Raleigh, NC: Center for Universal Design, North Carolina State University; 1998.
25. Schneidert M, Hurst R, Miller J, Ustün B. The role of environment in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:588-595. (Pubitemid 36806192)
26. Lawton MP, Simon B. The ecology of social relationships in housing for the elderly. Gerontologist. 1968;8:108-115.
27. Lawton MP. Three functions of the residential environment. In: Pastalan LA, Cowart ME, eds. Lifestyles and Housing of Older Adults: The Florida Experience. Binghamtom, NY: Haworth Press Inc; Journal of Housing for the Elderly. 1989:35-50.
28. Lawton MP. Competence, environmental press, and the adaptation of older people. In: Lawton MP, Windley PG, Byerts TO, eds. Aging and the Environment. New York, NY: Springer; 1982:33-59.
29. Weiss CO, Hoenig HM, Fried LP. Compensatory strategies used by older adults facing mobility disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1217-1220. (Pubitemid 47362033)
30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults - United States, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:120-125.
31. Adams PF, Wilson Lucas J, Barnes PM. Summary health statistics for U.S. population: National Health Interview Survey, 2006. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2008:10(236).
32. Lewin K. Field Theory in Social Science. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers; 1951.
33. Oswald F, Hieber A, Wahl H, Mollenkopf H. Ageing and person: environment fit in different urban neighbourhoods. Eur J Ageing. 2005;2:88-97. (Pubitemid 41086540)
34. Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:210-222. (Pubitemid 39371336)
35. Whiteneck G, Brooks CA, Charlifue S, et al. Guide for use of the CHART: Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Available at: http://www.craighospital.org/research/CHART%20Manual.pdf. Accessed May 2, 2009.
36. Putnam M. Linking aging theory and disability models: increasing the potential to explore aging with physical impairment. Gerontologist. 2002;42:799-806. (Pubitemid 35434884)
37. Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, et al. Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1793-1803. (Pubitemid 39441137)
38. Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark S, Morgan KA. A subjective measure of environmental facilitators and barriers to participation for people with mobility limitations. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30: 434-457. (Pubitemid 351298315)
39. Stark S, Hollingsworth HH, Morgan KA, Gray DB. Development of a measure of receptivity of the physical environment. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:123-137. (Pubitemid 46431580)
40. Peel C, Sawyer Baker P, Roth DL, et al. Assessing mobility in older adults: the UAB Study of Aging Life-Space Assessment. Phys Ther. 2005;85:1008-1119. (Pubitemid 41396001)
41. Patla AE, Shumway-Cook A. Dimensions of mobility: defining the complexity and difficulty associated with community mobility. J Aging Phys Act. 1999;7:7-19. (Pubitemid 29086434)
42. Shumway-Cook A, Patla AE, Stewart A, et al. Environmental demands associated with community mobility in older adults with and without mobility disabilities. Phys Ther. 2002;82:670-681. (Pubitemid 34728977)
43. Bandinelli S, Pozzi M, Lauretani F, et al. Adding challenge to performance-based tests of walking: the Walking InCHIANTI Toolkit (WIT). Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85:986-991. (Pubitemid 44789615)
44. Iwarsson S, Wahl HW, Nygren C, et al. Importance of the home environment for healthy aging: conceptual and methodological background of the European ENABLE-AGE Project. Gerontologist. 2007;47:78-84.
45. McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care. 1994;32:551-567.
46. Coyne KS, Margolis MK, Gilchrist KA, et al. Evaluating effects of method of administration on walking impairment questionnaire. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:296-304. (Pubitemid 41123253)
47. Kelly-Hayes M, Jette AM, Wolf PA, et al. Functional limitations and disability among elders in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:841-845.
48. Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) 2004 panel questionnaire functional limitations and disability section. Available at: http://www.bls.census.gov/sipp/top-mod/2004/quests/2004w5tm. pdf. Accessed May 6, 2008.
49. Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Fitzpatrick R. Older people specific health status and quality of life: a structured review of self-assessed instruments. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11:315-327. (Pubitemid 41059313)
50. Madans J, Rasch B, Altman B. Exploring the impact of assistive device use on disability measurement. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/ppt/citygroup/madans- rasch-altman.ppt. Accessed May 14, 2008.
51. Boggatz T, Dijkstra A, Lohrmann C, Dassen T. The meaning of care dependency as shared by care givers and care recipients: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2007; 60:561-569.
52. SaMs JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, et al. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297-322.
53. Trayers T, Lawlor DA. Bridging the gap in health inequalities with the help of health trainers: a realistic task in hostile environments? A short report for debate. J Public Health (Oxf). 2007;29:218-221.
54. Pollard B, Johnston M. The assessment of disability associated with osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006;18:531-536. (Pubitemid 44200341)
55. Pope SK, Sowers MF, Welch GW, Albrecht G. Functional limitations in women at midlife: the role of health conditions, behavioral and environmental factors. Women's Health Issues. 2001;11:494-502. (Pubitemid 33009437)