Inference to the best explanation: A neglected approach to theory appraisal in psychology

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 122, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 219-234

  Haig, Brian D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESEARCH; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BAYES THEOREM; CULTURE; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH;

EID: 67649818527     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Achinstein, P. (1989). Explanation and acceptability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 467-468.
2. Boyd, R. N. (1984). The current status of scientific realism. In J. Leplin (Ed.), Scientific realism (pp. 41-82). Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Brush, S. G. (1989). Prediction and theory bending: The case of light bending. Science, 246, 1124-1129.
4. Capaldi, E. J., & Proctor, R. W. (2008). Are theories to be evaluated in isolation or relative to alternatives? An abductive view. American Journal of Psychology, 121, 617-641.
5. Durrant, R., & Haig, B. D. (2001). How to pursue the adaptationist program in psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 357-380.
6. Edwards, W., Lindman, H., & Savage, L. J. (1963). Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review, 70, 193-242.
7. Eflin, J. T., & Kite, M. E. (1996). Teaching scientific reasoning through attribution. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 87-91.
8. Erwin, E. (1992). Current philosophical issues in the scientific evaluation of behavior therapy theory and outcome. Behavior Therapy, 23, 151-171.
9. Giere, R. N. (1983). Testing theoretical hypotheses. In J. Earman (Ed.), Testing scientific theories (pp. 269-298). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10. Glymour, C. (1980). Theory and evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11. Glymour, C. (1992). Invasion of the mind snatchers. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 465-474). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12. Haig, B. D. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, 10, 371-388.
13. Harman, G. (1965). The inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review, 74, 88-95.
14. Hooker, C. A. (1987). A realistic theory of science. New York: State University of New York Press.
15. Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (2006). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach (3rd ed.). La Salle, IL: Open Court.
16. Janssen, M. (2003). COI stories: Explanation and evidence in the history of science. Perspectives on Science, 10, 457-522.
17. Josephson, J. R., & Josephson, S. G. (1994). Abductive inference: Computation, philosophy, technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Laudan, L. (1981). Science and hypothesis. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
20. Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2005). Bayesian statistical inference in psychology: Comment on Trafimow (2003). Psychological Review, 112, 662-668.
21. Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
22. Lycan, W. G. (1988). Judgement and justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason, and science: Processes of discovery and explanation. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
24. Markus, K., Hawes, S. S., & Thasites, R. (2008). Abductive inference to psychological variables: Steiger's question and best explanations in psychopathy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64, 1069-1088.
25. McGrew, T. (2003). Confirmation, heuristics, and explanatory reasoning. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54, 553-567.
26. McMullin, E. (1982). Values in science. In P. D. Asquith & T. Nickles (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1982 biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (Vol. 2, pp. 3-28). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
27. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
28. Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected papers (Vols. 1-8, Ed. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. Burks). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2006). Why science matters: Understanding the methods of psychological research. London: Blackwell.
30. Psillos, S. (2002). Simply the best: A case for abduction. In A. C. Kakas & F. Sadri (Eds.), Computational logic (pp. 605-625). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
31. Psillos, S. (2004). Inference to the best explanation and Bayesianism. In F. Stadler (Ed.), Induction and deduction in the sciences (pp. 83-91). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
32. Quine, W. V., & Ullian, J. S. (1978). The web of belief (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
33. Rorer, L. G. (1991). Some myths of science in psychology. In D. Cicchetti & W. M. Grove (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology, Vol. 1: Matters of public interest (pp. 61-87). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34. Rosenkrantz, R. D. (1977). Inference, method, and decision: Toward a Bayesian philosophy of science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
35. Rozeboom, W. W. (1999). Good science is abductive, not hypothetico-deductive. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 335-391). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Thagard, P. (1978). The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice. Journal of Philosophy, 75, 76-92.
37. Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435-467.
38. Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Thagard, P. (2007). Coherence, truth, and the development of scientific knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 74, 28-47.
41. Thagard, P., & Litt, A. (2008). Models of scientific explanation. In R. Sun (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of computational cognitive modeling (pp. 549-564). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. van Fraassen, B. C. (1989). Laws and symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Weisberg, J. (2009). Locating IBE in the Bayesian framework. Synthese, 167, 125-143.
44. Whewell, W. (1967). The philosophy of the inductive sciences. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.
45. Woodward, J. (1989). Data and phenomena. Synthese, 79, 393-472.