Adaptive glenoid bone remodeling simulation

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 42, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1460-1468

  Sharma, Gulshan B ^a,c   Debski, Richard E ^a   McMahon, Patrick J ^a   Robertson, Douglas D ^a,b  

^a University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bone remodeling; Finite element analysis; Glenoid; Simulation; Total shoulder arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE REMODELING; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GLENOID; SIMULATION; TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY;

BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTHETICS; SHOULDERS (ROAD); SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GLENOID BONE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LOADING TEST; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHOULDER GIRDLE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SCAPULA; SHOULDER JOINT;

EID: 67649794818     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ahir S.P., Walker P.S., Squire-Taylor C.J., Blunn G.W., and Bayley J.I. Analysis of glenoid fixation for a reversed anatomy fixed-fulcrum shoulder replacement. Journal of Biomechanics 37 11 (2004) 1699-1708
2. Beaupre G.S., Orr T.E., and Carter D.R. An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling-application: a preliminary remodeling simulation. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 8 5 (1990) 662-670
3. Boileau P., Avidor C., Krishnan S.G., Walch G., Kempf J.F., and Mole D. Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 11 4 (2002) 351-359
4. Buchler P., Ramaniraka N.A., Rakotomanana L.R., Iannotti J.P., and Farron A. A finite element model of the shoulder: application to the comparison of normal and osteoarthritic joints. Clinical Biomechanics 17 9-10 (2002) 630-639
5. Chen G., Pettet G., Pearcy M., and McElwain D.L. Comparison of two numerical approaches for bone remodelling. Medical Engineering & Physics 29 1 (2007) 134-139
6. Gupta S., New A.M., and Taylor M. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head. Clinical Biomechanics 21 6 (2006) 594-602
7. Gupta S., van der Helm F.C., and van Keulen F. The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component-a finite element study. Clinical Biomechanics 19 3 (2004) 292-302
8. Gupta S., van der Helm F.C., and van Keulen F. Stress analysis of cemented glenoid prostheses in total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Biomechanics 37 11 (2004) 1777-1786
9. Hopkins A.R., Hansen U.N., and Amis A.A. Finite element models of total shoulder replacement: application of boundary conditions. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 8 1 (2005) 39-44
10. Jacobs C.R., Levenston M.E., Beaupre G.S., Simo J.C., and Carter D.R. Numerical instabilities in bone remodeling simulations: the advantages of a node-based finite element approach. Journal of Biomechanics 28 4 (1995) 449-459
11. Jang I.G., Kim I.Y., and Kwak B.B. Analogy of strain energy density based bone-remodeling algorithm and structural topology optimization. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the ASME 131 1 (2009) 011012
12. Lacroix D., Murphy L.A., and Prendergast P.J. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glenoid replacement prostheses: a comparison of keeled and pegged anchorage systems. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the ASME 122 4 (2000) 430-436
13. Martin R.B. Porosity and specific surface of bone. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 10 3 (1984) 179-222
14. Matsen III F.A., Clinton J., Lynch J., Bertelsen A., and Richardson M.L. Glenoid component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 90 4 (2008) 885-896
15. Orr T.E., Carter D.R., and Schurman D.J. Stress analyses of glenoid component designs. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 232 (1988) 217-224
16. Poppen N.K., and Walker P.S. Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 135 (1978) 165-170
17. Rho J.Y., Hobatho M.C., and Ashman R.B. Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Medical Engineering & Physics 17 5 (1995) 347-355
18. Skirving A.P. Total shoulder arthroplasty-current problems and possible solutions. Journal of Orthopaedic Science 4 1 (1999) 42-53
19. Smolinski P., and Rubash H.E. Bone remodeling around total hip implants. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 20 5-6 (1992) 461-483
20. Stone K.D., Grabowski J.J., Cofield R.H., Morrey B.F., and An K.N. Stress analyses of glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 8 2 (1999) 151-158
21. Torchia M.E., Cofield R.H., and Settergren C.R. Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 6 6 (1997) 495-505
22. Weinans H., Huiskes R., van Rietbergen B., Sumner D.R., Turner T.M., and Galante J.O. Adaptive bone remodeling around bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 11 4 (1993) 500-513
23. Wirth M.A., and Rockwood Jr. C.A. Complications of total shoulder-replacement arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 78 4 (1996) 603-616
24. Zannoni C., Mantovani R., and Viceconti M. Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method. Medical Engineering & Physics 20 10 (1998) 735-740