Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: A randomized trial

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 280, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 19-24

  Özkan, Sebiha ^a,b   ÇalIşkan, Eray ^a   Doǧer, Emek ^a   Yücesoy, Izzet ^a   Özeren, Semih ^a   Vural, Birol ^a  

^a KOCAELI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Güney Mahallesi 7 Sokak No: 20 Kat: 2 ^*  (Turkey)

Author keywords

Dinoprostone; Labor induction; Misoprostol

Indexed keywords

MISOPROSTOL; OXYTOCIN; PROSTAGLANDIN E2; OXYTOCIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; FEMALE; FETUS HEART RATE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VAGINAL DELIVERY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; INTRAVAGINAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; METHODOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; TIME;

ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVAGINAL; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DINOPROSTONE; FEMALE; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; MISOPROSTOL; OXYTOCICS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, THIRD; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 67649662097     PISSN: 09320067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-008-0843-9     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. P Dällenbach M Boulvain C Viardot O Irion 2003 Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial Am J Obstet Gynecol 188 162 167 10.1067/mob.2003.108
2. EJ Langenegger HJ Odendaal D Grove 2005 Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor Int J Gynaecol Obstet 88 242 248 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.12.005
3. N Agarwal A Gupta A Kriplan N Bhatla 2003 Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction J Obstet Gynaecol Res 29 3 147 151 10.1046/j.1341-8076.2003.00091.x
4. S Gregson M Waterstone I Norman T Murrels 2005 A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 112 438 444 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00496.x
5. N van Gemund S Scherjon S le Cessie SJH van Leeuwen J van Roosmaln HHH Kanhai 2004 A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 111 42 49 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.00010.x
6. 2 for labor induction Int J Gynaecol Obstet 80 23 28 10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00333-8
7. L Sanchez-Ramos AM Kaunitz I Delke FL Gaudier 1999 Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol 94 878 883 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00320-8
8. D Garry R Figueroa RB Kalish CJ Catalano D Maulik 2003 Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 13 254 259 10.1080/713605867 (Pubitemid 36461443)
9. L Sanchez-Ramos AM Kaunitz 2000 Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review of the literature Clin Obstet Gynecol 43 475 488 10.1097/00003081-200009000-00008
10. L Sanchez-Ramos AM Kaunitz RL Wears I Delke FL Gaudier 1997 Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol 89 633 642 10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00374-2
11. DA Wing 1999 Labor induction with misoprostol Am J Obstet Gynecol 181 339 345 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70558-2
12. P Rosenberg S Chevret MV Senat 2004 A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 247 253 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12. 038
13. 2 tablets in labour induction at term BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 111 436 440 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00107.x
14. 2 for induction of labor on the incidence of pathological CTG tracing: a randomized trial Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 116 34 38 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.038
15. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1995) Induction of labor. ACOG Technical Bulletin No.217, ACOG, Washington, DC
16. TJ Garite GA Dildy H McNamara 2000 A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns Am J Obstet Gynecol 183 5 1049 1058 10.1067/mob.2000.110632
17. 1 methyl analogue misoprostol versus oxytocin: a randomized trial Obstet Gynecol 81 332 336 (Pubitemid 23085284)
18. DA Wing MM Jones A Rahall TM Goodwin RH Paul 1995 A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction Am J Obstet Gynecol 172 1804 1810 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91415-3
19. AU Leukomage SF Forsyth KR Sullivan H El Refaey CH Rodeck 2003 Dinoprostone versus misoprostol. A randomized study of nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82 133 137 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00066.x
20. EG Hughes AJ Kelly J Kavanagh 2001 Dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction: a metaanalysis Obstet Gynecol 97 847 855 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01216-3
21. PA Le Roux JO Olaragun J Penny J Anthony 2002 Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 99 201 205 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01681-7
22. D Buser G Mora F Arias 1997 A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices Obstet Gynecol 89 581 585 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00015-X
23. SK Yip AO Tse CJ Haines TK Chung 2000 Misoprostol's effect on uterine arterial blood flow and fetal heart rate in early pregnancy Obstet Gynecol 95 232 235 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00472-X
24. WH Chen HC Lai YH Tang HS Liu 1999 Fetal Doppler hemodynamic changes in spontaneous versus prostaglandin induced active labor Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78 599 604 10.1034/j.1600-0412.1999.780707.x