Diastereoselective domino reactions of chiral 2-substituted 1-(2′,2′,3′,3′-tetramethylcyclopropyl)-alkan-1-ols under Friedel-crafts conditions

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 74, Issue 13, 2009, Pages 4747-4752

  Stadler, Daniel ^a   Bach, Thorsten ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACIDIC CONDITIONS; ALKANOLS; CARBONYL ADDITION; CHEMICAL EQUATIONS; CHEMICAL YIELDS; DIASTEREO-SELECTIVITY; DIASTEREOSELECTIVE; DOMINO REACTIONS; FRIEDEL-CRAFTS; FRIEDEL-CRAFTS ALKYLATION; FRIEDEL-CRAFTS ALKYLATION REACTION; METHYLTHIOPHENE; REACTION CONDITIONS; RING OPENING; SUBSTITUTION PRODUCTS;

ALDEHYDES; ALKYLATION; ESTERS; FRIEDEL-CRAFTS REACTION; HYDROCARBONS; REACTION KINETICS;

POSITIVE IONS;

2 METHYLTHIOPHENE; 2,3,3 TRIMETHYL 1 (2',2',3',3' TETRAMETHYLCYCLOPROPYL) BUTAN 1 OL; ALKANOL; BROMINE; BRONSTED ACID; CARBONYL DERIVATIVE; ESTER; LITHIUM DERIVATIVE; N (PARA TOLUENESULFONYL)PYRROLE; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON; PYRROLE DERIVATIVE; TETRAMETHYLCYCLOPROPYL LITHIUM; THIOPHENE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADDITION REACTION; ARTICLE; CHIRALITY; DIASTEREOISOMER; FRIEDEL CRAFTS REACTION; GAS LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; RING OPENING; STEREOCHEMISTRY; WAGNER MEERWEIN REARRANGEMENT;

EID: 67649631273     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo900445c     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. (a) Olah, G. A.; Kelly, D. P.; Jeuell, C. L.; Porter, R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 2544-2546.
2. (b) Kelly, D. P.; Brown, H. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 3897-3900.
3. (c) Servis, K. L.; Shue, F.-F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7233-7240.
4. (d) Friedrich, E. C. In The Chemistry of the Cyclopropyl Group; Rappoport, Z., Ed.; Wiley: Chichester, 1987; pp 633-700.
5. (e) Boche, G.; Walborsky, H. M. In Cyclopropane Derived Reactive Intermediates; Patai, S., Rappoport, Z., Eds.; Wiley: Chichester, 1990; pp 117-173.
6. (f) Olah, G. A.; Prakash, V. R.; Prakash, G. K. S. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 69-95.
7. Olah, G. A.; Bollinger, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 6082-6086.
8. One reviewer has raised the question whether the cyclopropylcarbinyl cation and the depicted tertiary cation resulting from alcohol 1 prior to rearrangement to cation 2 are different species or just different Lewis structures representing the same cation. While we have not studied this issue more closely, we feel that the rearrangement is easier to understand in the way it is drawn in Figure 1. However, one could of course accommodate this concern by replacing the reaction arrow with a double-headed arrow (↔) representing mesomeric structures.
9. (a) Poulter, C. D.; Winstein, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 3649-3650.
10. (b) Poulter, C. D.; Winstein, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 3650-3652.
11. (c) Poulter, C. D.; Winstein, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 2297-2305.
12. (a) Mühlthau, F.; Schuster, O.; Bach, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9348-9349.
13. (b) Mühlthau, F.; Bach, T. Synthesis 2005, 3428-13426
14. (c) Stadler, D.; Mühlthau, F.; Rubenbauer, P.; Herdtweck, E.; Bach, T. Synlett 2006, 2573-2576.
15. (d) Rubenbauer, P.; Bach, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1305-1309.
16. (e) Rubenbauer, P.; Bach, T. Adv. Synth. Cat. 2008, 350, 1125-1130.
17. (f) Stadler, D.; Bach, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7557-7559.
18. (a) Mühlthau, F.; Stadler, D.; Goeppert, A.; Olah, G. A.; Prakash, G. K. S.; Bach, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9668-9675.
19. (b) Stadler, D.; Bach, T. Chem. - Asian J. 2008, 3, 272-284.
20. (c) Stadler, D.; Goeppert, A.; Rasul, G.; Olah, G. A.; Prakash, G. K. S.; Bach, T. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 312-318.
21. Rubenbauer, P.; Herdtweck, E.; Strassner, T.; Bach, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 10106-10109.
22. For previous work in this area, see: Ishikawa, T.; Aikawa, T.; Mori, Y.; Saito, S. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3037-3040.
23. Hackett, M.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1449-1462.
24. Stratakis, M.; Kalaitzakis, D.; Stavroulakis, D.; Kosmas, G.; Tsangarakis, C. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3471-3474.
25. (a) Chérest, M.; Felkin, H.; Prudent, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 2199-2204.
26. (b) Anh, N. T.; Eisenstein, O. Nouv. J. Chem. 1977, 1, 61-70.
27. (c) Anh, N. T. Top. Curr. Chem. 1980, 88, 145-162.
28. Laurie, D.; Lucas, E.; Nonhebel, D. C.; Suckling, C. J.; Walton, J. C. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 1035-1045.
29. (a) Heathcock, C. H.; Buse, C. T.; Kleschick, W. A.; Pirrung, M. C.; Sohn, J. E.; Lampe, J. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 1066-1081.
30. (b) Tanabe, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1989, 62, 1917-1924.
31. Tietze, L. F.; Brasche, G.; Gericke, K. Domino Reactions in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2006.
32. Lau, K. S. Y.; Schlosser, M. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 1595-1598.
33. Eliel, E. L.; Wilen, S. H. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1994; pp 696-697. It should be noted, however, that the conformational A value provides only a rough estimate for the size of a functional group.
34. Chung, J. Y. L.; Mancheno, D.; Dormer, P. G.; Variankaval, N.; Ball, R. G.; Tsou, N. N. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3037-3040.
35. Iwasawa, N.; Matsuo, T.; Iwamoto, M.; Ikeno, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3903-3914.
36. (a) Kanemoto, S.; Shimizu, M.; Yoshioka, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 663-666.
37. (b) Shimizu, M.; Yoshioka, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 3119-3122.
38. (c) Kanemoto, S.; Shimizu, M.; Yoshioka, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1989, 62, 2024-2031.
39. Maerker, A.; Bsata, M.; Buchmeier, W.; Engelen, B. Chem. Ber. 1984, 117, 2547-2554.
40. Shinzo, S. Japanese Patent 06271484 A 19940927, 1994.