How to select candidates for lateral unicompartmental prosthesis

Techniques in Knee Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 51-59

  Servien, Elvire ^a   Aitsiselmi, Tarik ^a   Neyret, Philippe ^a,c   Verdonk, Peter ^a,b  

^a HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^c Centre Livet   (France)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Valgus

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; IMPLANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; OSTEOTOMY; PATIENT SELECTION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT INDICATION; VALGUS DEFORMITY; VARUS DEFORMITY;

EID: 33947164640     PISSN: 15360636     EISSN: 15381935     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/btk.0b013e3180326ee9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Marmor L. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee with a minimum ten-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop. 1988;228:171-177.
2. Cartier P, Chaib S, Vanvooren P. Unicompartmental prosthetic replacement of the knee. Apropos of 159 cases - a maximum follow-up of 10 years. Rev Chir Orthop. 1987;73:130-133.
3. Newman JH. Why do I do so many unicompartmental knee replacements? In: La prothèse du genou. Montpellier: Sauramps medical; 2004:287-292.
4. Robertsson O, Borgquist L, Knutson K, et al. Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70:170-175.
5. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg B. 1998;80:983-989.
6. Ashraf T, Newmann JH, Evans RL, et al. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: survivorship and clinical experience over 21 years. J Bone Joint Surg B. 2002;8:1126-1130.
7. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:600-613.
8. International Knee Documentation Committee. IKDC Evaluation Form. Available at: www.sportsmed.org/research/docs/IKDC.pdf; www.esska.org/pdf/ IKDCeng.pdf.
9. Ridgeway SR, McAuley JP, Ammeen DJ, et al. The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:351-355.
10. Gunther T, Murray DW, Miller R. Lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford meniscal knee. Knee. 1996;3:33-39.
11. Kennedy WR, White RP. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop. 1987;221:278-285.
12. Jenny JY, Boéri C, Ballonzoli L, et al. Difficulties and reproducibility of radiological measurement of the proximal tibial axis according to Lévigne. Rev Chir Orthop. 2005;91:658-663.
13. Servien E, Neyret P, Deschamps G. Prothèses unicompartimentales: prothèse condylienne de resurfaçage. In: La prothèse du genou. Montpellier, France: Sauramps Medical; 2004:263-266.
14. Robinson BJ, Rees JL, Price AJ, et al. Dislocation of the bearing of the Oxford lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty. A radiological assessment. J Bone Joint Surg B. 2002;84:653-657.
15. Emerson RH, Thomas H, Thomas R, et al. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee implant. Clin Orthop. 2002;404:62-70.
16. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11:40-45.