Navon letters affect face learning and face retrieval

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 258-264

  Lewis, Michael B ^a   Mills, Claire ^a   Hills, Peter J ^b   Weston, Nicola ^a,c  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Eye witnesses; Face recognition; Memory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CRIME; DECISION MAKING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; RECALL; RECEPTIVE FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CRIME; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACE; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; SIZE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67649556661     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.258     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Brown, C., and Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (2002). Verbal overshadowing in a multiple face presentation paradigm: Effects of description instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 873-885.
2. Bruce, V., and Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
3. Hills, P. J., and Lewis, M. B. (2007). Temporal limitation of Navon effect on face recognition. Perception and Motor Skills, 104, 501-509.
4. Kitagami, S., Sato, W., and Yoshikawa, S. (2002). The influence of test-set similarity in verbal overshadowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 963-972.
5. Lawson, R. (2007). Local and global processing biases fail to influence face, object and word recognition. Visual Cognition, 15, 710-740.
6. Leder, H., and Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognised: The role of configural information in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 513-536.
7. Lewis, M. B., and Glenister, T. E. (2003). A sideways look at configural encoding. Perception, 32, 7-14.
8. Macmillan, N. A., and Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. USA: Cambridge University Press.
9. Macrae, C. N., and Lewis, H. L. (2002). Do I know you?: Processing orientation and face recognition. Psychological Science, 13, 194-196.
10. Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., and Kelley, C. M. (2001). The influence of retrieval processes in verbal overshadowing. Memory and Cognition, 29, 176-186.
11. Meissner, C. A., and Memon, A. (2002). Verbal overshadowing: A special issue exploring theoretical and applied issues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 869-872.
12. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before the trees: The precedence of global features invisual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
13. Perfect, T. J. (2003). Local processing bias impairs line-up performance. Psychological Report, 93, 393-394.
14. Perfect, T. J., Dennis, I., and Snell, A. (2007). The effects of local and global processing bias on eyewitness identification performance. Memory, 15, 784-798.
15. Rhodes, G., Brake, S., and Atkinson, A. P. (1993). What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition, 47, 25-57.
16. Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
17. Schooler, J. W., and Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
18. Schooler, J. W. (2002). Verbalisation produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 989-997.
19. Snodgrass, J. G., and Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition measuring: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
20. Tanaka, J. W., and Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
21. Weston, N., Perfect, T. J., and Schooler, J. (2008). The effects of verbal overshadowing and Navon bias on face recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 587-611.