On the assessment of modal nonlinear pushover analysis for steel frames with semi-rigid connections

Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 383-398

  Zarfam, Panam ^a   Mofid, Massood ^a  

^a SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Modal Pushover (MPA); Non linear analysis; Semi rigid connection

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES; HINGES; MODAL ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; RIGIDITY; SEISMOLOGY; STEEL CONSTRUCTION; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS; MODAL PUSHOVER (MPA); MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS; NON-LINEAR PUSHOVER ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR RESPONSE HISTORY ANALYSIS; SEISMIC ESTIMATION; SEMIRIGID CONNECTIONS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHODS;

RIGID STRUCTURES;

EID: 67649547320     PISSN: 12254568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12989/sem.2009.32.3.383     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. AISC (1994), Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago.
2. AISC (2006), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction.
3. Allahabadi, R. and Powell, GH. (1988), DRAIN-2DX User Guide, Report No. UCB/EERC88/06, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.
4. American Society of Civil Engineers (2000), Prestandardand Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
5. Applied Technology Council (1996), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Report No. ATC-40, Redwood City, California.
6. Building Seismic Safety Council (1997), NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
7. Chopra, A.K. and Chintanapakee, C. (2004), "Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using vertically "regular"and "irregular" generic frames", Earihq. Spectra, 20(1), 225-271.
8. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2001), "A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands of buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31, 561-582.
9. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. (2002), "Evaluation of MPA procedure using SAC buildings", Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Submitted for Publication.
10. Kishi, N. and Chen, WF. (1986), Database for Steel Beam-to-Column Connections, CE-STR-86-26, School of Civ. Engrg., Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind.
11. Krawinkler, H. and Seneviratna, GD.P.K. (1998), "Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation", Eng. Struct. 20(4-6), 452-464.
12. Kunnath, S.K. and Gupta, B. (2000), "Validity of deformation demand estimates using nonlinear static procedures", Proceeding of the U.S. Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Engineering for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
13. Mofid, M., Zarfam, P. and Fard, B.R. (2005), "On the modal incremental dynamic analysis", Struct. Des. Tall Especial Build, 14, 315-329.
14. Sasaki, K.K., Freeman, S.A. and Paret, T.F. (1998), "Multimode pushover procedure (MMP)-A method to identify the effect of higher modes in a pushover analysis", Proceeding of the 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, Washington.
15. UBC (2005), "Structural engineering design provisions", Uniform Building Code, Vol. 2, International Conference of Building Officials.