The relationship between culture and public relations

The Future of Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management: Challenges for the Next Generation

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 507-526

  Sriramesh, Krishnamurthy ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649526303     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613967     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Aw, A., Tan, S. K., and Tan, R. (2002, July). Guanxi and public relations: An exploratory qualitative study of the public relations-Guanxi phenomenon in Singapore firms. Paper presented to the Public Relations Division of the International Communication Association, Seoul, South Korea.
2. Cameron, G. T., & McCollum, T. (1993). Competing corporate cultures: A multi-method, cultural analysis of the role of internal communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 5(4), pp. 217-250.
3. Chen, N. (1996). Public relations in China: The Introduction and development of an occupational field. In H. Culberton & N. Chen (Eds.). International public relations: A comparative analysis (pp. 121-154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Collectivism, collaboration, and societal corporatism as core professional values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 2-48.
5. CPRE. (1999). Public relations education for the 21st century: A port of entry. Retrieved May 23, 2005, from http://www.prsa.org/_Resources/resources/pre21.asp?ident=rsrc6
6. Downey, S. M. (1986). The relationship between corporate culture and corporate identity. Public Relations Quarterly, 31(4), 7-12.
7. Dozier, D. M., & Lauzen, M. M. (2000). Liberating the intellectual domain from the practice: Public relations, activism, and the role of the scholar. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 2-22.
8. Everett, J. L. (1990). Organizational culture and ethnoecology in public relations theory and practice. Public Relations Research Annual, pp. 235-252.
9. Freedom House. (2000). Democracy's century: A survey of global political change in the 20th century. Retrieved June 4, 2005, from http://www.freedomhouse.org/reports/century.html
10. Grunig, J. E. (2000). Collectivism, collaboration, and societal corporatism as core professional values in public relations. Journal of Public Relationships Research, 12(1), 23-48.
11. Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
12. Grunig, L. A. (1995). The consequences of culture for public relations: The case of women in the foreign service. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7(2), 139-161.
13. Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E., & Dozier, D. M. (2002). Excellent public relations and effective organizations: A study of communication management in three countries. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Grunig, L. A., Toth, E. L., & Hon, L. C. (2000). Feminist values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 49-68.
15. Heath, R. L. (2000). A rhetorical perspective on the values of public relations: Crossroads and pathways toward concurrence. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 69-92.
16. Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., McMillan, C. J., & Schwitter, J. P (1974). The culture-free context of organization structure: A tri-national comparison. Sociology, 8, 59-80.
17. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18. Hofstede, G. (1991). Culture and organization: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
19. Holtzhausen, D. R. (2000). Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 93-114.
20. Hon, L. C., & Grunig, J. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships inpublic relations. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.
21. Huang, Y. H. (1990). Risk communication, models of public relations and anti-nuclear activities: A case study of a nuclear power plant in Taiwan. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
22. Huang, Y. H. (1997, May). Toward the contemporary Chinese philosophy of public relations: A perspective from the theory of global public relations. Paper presented to the Public Relations Division at the 47th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Quebec, Canada.
23. Huang, Y. H. (2000). The personal influence model and gao guanxi in Taiwan Chinese public relations. Public Relations Review, 26, 216-239.
24. Huang, Y H. (2001). OPRA: A cross-cultural, multiple-item scale for measuring organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13(1), 61-90.
25. Hung, C. J. F. (2003, May). Culture, relationship cultivation, and relationship outcomes: A qualitative evaluation on multinational companies' relationship management in China. Paper presented at the Public Relations Division in the 53rd Annual Conference of International Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
26. Kim, H. S. (2003). Exploring global public relations in a Korean multinational organization in the context of Confucian culture. Asian Journal of Communication, 13(2), 65-95.
27. Kipnis, A. (1997). Producing guanxi: Sentiment, self, and subculture in a North China village. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
28. Kluckhohn, F. (1953). Dominant and variant value orientations. In C. Kluckhohn & H. Murray (Eds.), Personality in nature, society, and culture (pp. 342-357). New York: Knopf.
29. Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (2000a). A longitudinal study of organization-public relationships: Defining the role of communication in the practice of relationship management. In J. A. Ledingham & S. D. Bruning (Eds.), Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach in the study and practice of public relations (pp. 55-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (Eds.). (2000b). Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice ofpublic relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Lee, B. K. (2004). Corporate image examined in a Chinese-based context: Study of a young educated public in Hong Kong. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(1), 1-34.
32. Lyra, A. (1991). Public relations in Greece: Models, roles and gender. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
33. Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Mulder, M. (1977). The daily power game. Leyden: Martinus Nijhoff.
35. Negandhi, A. R., & Robey, D. (1977). Understanding organizational behavior in multinational and multicultural settings. Human Resource Management, 16(1), 16-24.
36. Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
37. Pascale, R. T., & Athos, A. G. (1981). The art of Japanese management. New York: Simon & Schuster.
38. Public Relations Body of Knowledge Task Force Report. (1988). Public Relations Review, XIV(1), 3-40.
39. Raz, A. E. (2002). Emotions at work: Normative control, organizations, and culture in Japan and America. London: Harvard University Press.
40. Reber, B. H., & Cameron, G. T. (2003). Measuring contingencies: Using scales to measure public relations practitioner limits to accommodation. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(2), 431-446.
41. Rhee, Y. (1999). Confucian culture and excellent public relations: A study of generic principles and specific applications in South Korean public relations practice. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
42. Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 339-358.
43. Sriramesh, K. (1989, November). Culture and communication: Corporate culture as a determinant of symmetrical communication in organizations. Paper presented to the panel of Symmetrical Communication for Professionals in Development organized by the Association for the Advancement of Policy, Research, and Development in the Third World, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
44. Sriramesh, K. (1992). The impact of societal culture on public relations: Ethnographic evidence from India. Public Relations Review, 18(2), 201-211.
45. Sriramesh, K. (1996). Power distance and public relations: An ethnographic study of southern Indian organizations. In H. Culbertson & Ni Chen (Eds.), International public relations: A comparative analysis (pp. 171-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Sriramesh, K. (2000). The models of public relations in India. Journal of Communication Management, 4(3), 225-239.
47. Sriramesh, K. (2002). The dire need for multiculturalism in public relations education: An Asian perspective. Journal of Communication Management, 7(1), 54-70.
48. Sriramesh, K., (2003). The missing link: Multiculturalism and public relations education. In K. Sriramesh& D. Vercic (Eds.), The global public relations handbook: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 505-521). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Sriramesh, K., & Enxi, L. (2004). Public relations practices and socio-economic factors: A case study of different organizational types in Shanghai. Journal of Communication Studies, 3(4), 44-77.
50. Sriramesh, K., & Grunig, J. E. (1988, November). Toward a cross-cultural theory of public relations: Preliminary evidence from India. Paper presented to the panel on New Frontiers in the International Management Environment, Association for the Advancement of Policy, Research and Development in the Third World, Myrtle Beach, NC.
51. Sriramesh, K., Grunig, J. E., & Buffington, J. (1992). Corporate culture and public relations. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communications management: Contributions to effective organizations (pp. 577-596). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Sriramesh, K., Grunig, J. E., & Dozier, D. (1996). Observation and measurement of organizational culture: Development of indices of participative and authoritarian cultures. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8(4), 229-262.
53. Sriramesh, K., Kim, Y., & Takasaki, M. (1999). Public relations in three Asian cultures: An analysis. Journal of Public Relations Research 11(4), 271-292.
54. Sriramesh, K., & Takasaki, M. (2000). The impact of culture on Japanese public relations. Journal of Communication Management 3(4), 337-352.
55. Sriramesh, K., & White, J. (1992). Societal culture and public relations. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communications management: Contributions to effective organizations (pp. 597-616). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Tan, S. L. (2000). Guanxi and public relations in Singapore: An exploratory study. Unpublished master's thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
57. Tayeb, M. H. (1988). Organizations and national culture: A comparative analysis. London: Sage.
58. Toth, E. L., & Pavlik, J.V. (2000). Public relations values in the new millennium. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 1-2.
59. Vasquez, G. M., & Taylor, M. (2000). What cultural values influence American public relations practitioners? Public Relations Review, 25(4), 433-449.
60. Vercic, D., Grunig, L. A., & Grunig, J. (1996). Global and specific principles of public relations: Evidence from Slovenia. In H. Culbertson & N. Chen (Eds.), International public relations: A comparative analysis (pp. 31-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Yoshikawa, M. J. (1993). Japanese and American modes of communication and implications for managerial and organizational behavior. In W. Dissanayake (Ed.), Communication theory: The Asian perspective (pp. 150-182). Singapore: The Asian Media Information and Communication Centre.