Solvent-induced photostability of acetylene molecules in clusters probed by multiphoton dissociation

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 113, Issue 26, 2009, Pages 7322-7330

  Farnik, Michal ^a   Poterya, Viktoriya ^a   Votava, Ondrej ^a   Ončák, Milan ^b   Slavíček, Petr ^a   Dauster, Ingo ^c   Buck, Udo ^d  

^a J HEYROVSKÝ INSTITUTE OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DYNAMICS AND SELF ORGANIZATION   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AB INITIO CALCULATIONS; ACETYLENE MOLECULES; CAGE EFFECT; FLUX DEPENDENCE; HYDROGEN DISSOCIATION; ISOLATED MOLECULES; KINETIC ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS; MEAN CLUSTER SIZE; MULTIPHOTON; MULTIPHOTON DISSOCIATION; PHOTO-STABILITY; PHOTOFRAGMENT; SINGLET MANIFOLD; SOLVENT MOLECULES; SUPERSONIC EXPANSIONS; VIBRATIONAL ENERGY FLOW;

ACETYLENE; ELECTRON ENERGY LOSS SPECTROSCOPY; GROUND STATE; HYDROGEN; KINETIC ENERGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULES; OPTICAL SENSORS; PHOTODISSOCIATION; PHOTOLYSIS; PHOTONS; SOLVENTS;

LIGHTING;

EID: 67649518802     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp811073j     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Franck, J.; Rabinovitsch, E. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1934, 30, 120.
2. Alimi, R.; Gerber, R. B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990, 64, 1453.
3. Gerber, R. B.; McCoy, A. B.; García-Vela, A. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1994, 45, 275.
4. Baumfalk, R.; Buck, U.; Frischkorn, C.; Nahler, N. H.; Hüwel, L. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 2595.
5. Buck, U. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 10049.
6. Fárník, M.; Nahler, N. H.; Buck, U.; Slavíč ek, P.; Jungwirth, P. Chem. Phys. 2005, 375, 161.
7. Onǐák, M.; Slavíček, P.; Poterya, V.; Fárník, M.; Buck, U. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 5344.
8. Poterya, V.; Fárník, M.; Slavíček, P.; Buck, U.; Kresin, V. V. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 071101.
9. Poterya, V.; Fárník, M.; Onǐák, M.; Slavíček, P. Phys. Chem. Chem Phys. 2008, 10, 4835.
10. Poterya, V.; Profant, V.; Fárník, M.; Slavíč ek, P.; Buck, U. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 064307.
11. Poterya, V.; Votava, O.; Fárník, M.; Oníǎk, M.; Slavíček, P.; Buck, U.; Friedrich, B. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 104313.
12. Gerber, R. B. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2004, 55, 55.
13. Chastaing, D.; Underwood, J.; Wittig, C. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 928.
14. Baumfalk, R.; Nahler, N. H.; Buck, U. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2001, 3, 2372.
15. Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Stanton, J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 263, 46.
16. Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 272, 319.
17. Malsch, K.; Rebentisch, R.; Swiderek, P.; Hohlneicher, G. Theor. Chem. Acc. 1998, 100, 171.
18. Maisch, K.; Hohlneicher, G.; Schork, R.; Koppel, H. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2001, 3, 5393.
19. Ventura, E.; Dallos, M.; Lischka, H. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 1702.
20. Halasz, G.; Vibok, K.; Baer, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005, 413, 226.
21. Thorn, R.; Wong, B.; Field, R.; Stanton, J. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 184307.
22. Koppel, H.; Schubert, B.; Lischka, H. Chem. Phys. 2008, 343, 319.
23. Mordaunt, D. H.; Ashfold, M. N. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 2630.
24. Wodtke, A. M.; Lee, Y. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 4744.
25. Fletcher, T. R.; Leone, S. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 871.
26. Balko, B. A.; Zhang, J.; Lee, Y. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 94, 7958.
27. Zhang, J.; Riehn, C. W.; Dulligan, M.; Wittig, C. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 6815.
28. Hsu, Y.-C.; Chen, F.-T.; Chou, L.-C.; Shiu, Y.-J. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 9153.
29. Mordaunt, D. H.; Ashfold, M. N. R.; Dixon, R. N.; Löffler, P.; Schnieder, L.; Welge, K. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 519.
30. Lauter, A.; Lee, K.; Jung, K.; Vatsa, R.; Mittal, J.; Volpp, H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 358, 314.
31. Ganot, Y.; Golan, A.; Sheng, X.; Rosenwaks, S.; Bar, I. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 5399.
32. Suzuki, T.; Hashimoto, N. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 2042-2050.
33. Tsuji, K.; Terauchi, C.; Shibuya, K.; Tsuchiya, S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 306, 41.
34. Yamakita, N.; Iwamoto, S.; Tsuchiya, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107 (15), 2597.
35. Baumfalk, R.; Buck, U.; Frischkorn, C.; Gandhi, S. R.; Lauenstein, C. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 606.
36. Slavíček, P.; Jungwirth, P.; Lewerenz, M.; Nahler, N. H.; Fárník, M.; Buck, U. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 4498.
37. Werner, H.-J.; Knowles, P. J.; Lindh, R.; Manby, F. R.; Schütz, M.; Celani, P.; Korona, T.; Rauhut, G.; Amos, R. D.; Bernhardsson, A.; Berning, A.; Cooper, D. L.; Deegan, M. J. O.; Dobbyn, A. J.; Eckert, F.; Hampel, C.; Hetzer, G.; Lloyd, A. W.; McNicholas, S. J.; Meyer, W.; Mura, M. E.; Nicklass, A.; Palmieri, P.; Pitzer, R.; Schumann, U.; Stoll, H.; Stone, A. J.; Tarroni, R.; Thorsteinsson, T. Molpro, A Package of Ab Initio Programs, version 2006.1; University College Cardiff Consultants Limited: Cardiff, U.K., 2006.
38. Bobbert, C.; Schütte, S.; Steinbach, C.; Buck, U. Eur. Phys. J. D 2002, 19, 183.
39. Shuler, K.; Dykstra, C. E. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 4562.
40. Latajka, Z.; Scheiner, S. Chem. Phys. 1997, 216, 37.
41. Baumfalk, R.; Nahler, N. H.; Buck, U.; Niv, M. Y.; Gerber, R. B. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 329.
42. Hagena, O. F. Surf. Sci. 1981, 106, 101.
43. Chickos, J. S.; Acree, W. E. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2002, 31, 537-698.
44. -2,45 it would follow that about 50 photons could be absorbed by the molecule within the 25-ns laser pulse, provided that the molecule absorption cross section does not change after photon absorption. Alternatively, up to about 50 molecules could be dissociated in the cluster within the laser pulse.
45. Seki, K.; Okabe, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 5284.
46. s corresponding to the present TOF spectra are very similar, with only minor differences in the near-zero region despite the different zero-kinetic-energy peaks in the TOF spectra.
47. 34
48. Lipciuc, M.; Wang, F.; Yang, X.; Kitsopoulos, T.; Fanourgakis, G.; Xantheas, S. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2008, 9, 1838.
49. Miller, R. E. Science 1988, 240, 447.
50. Zhong, Q.; Castleman, A. W. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 4039.
51. Dermota, T. E.; Zhong, Q.; Castleman, A. W. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1861.