The design of member review: Showing what to organization members and why

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 488-509

  Locke, Karen ^a   Ramakrishna Velamuri, S ^b  

^a The College of William and Mary   (United States)

^b CHINA EUROPE INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SCHOOL   (China)

Author keywords

Case studies; Ethics; IRBs; Member review; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649497498     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: 15527425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428108320235     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Agar, M. (2006). Culture: Can you take it anywhere ? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 (2). Article 11. Retrieved January 15th, 2007, from http://www.ualberta.ca/ĝ̂1/4ijqm/backissues/5-2/html/agar.htm
2. Angen, M. (2000). Evaluating interpretive inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10 (3). 378-395.
3. Baxter, J., & Eyles, J. (1997). Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: Establishing ''rigour'' in interview analysis. Transactions of the Institute for British Geographers, 22, 505-525.
4. Becker, H. (1967). Whose side are we on ? Social problems, 14, 239-247.
5. Behar, R. (1993). Translated woman: Crossing the border with Esperanza's story. Boston: Beacon.
6. Bloor, M. (1997). Techniques of validation in qualitative research: A critical commentary. In G. Miller & R. Dingwell (Eds.), Context and method in qualitative research (pp. 37-50). London: Sage.
7. Bradshaw, M. (2001). Contracts and member checks in qualitative research in human geography: Reason for caution. Area, 33, 202-211. (Pubitemid 32686864)
8. Brettell, C. B. (Ed.). (1993). When they read what we write: The politics of ethnography. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
9. Covaleski, M., Dirsmith, M., Hein, J., & Samuel, S. (1998). The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in big six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 293-327.
10. Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Douglas, J.D. (1976). Investigative social research: Individual and team field research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12. Ellis, C. (1995). Emotional and ethical quagmires in returning to the field. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24, 68-98.
13. Emerson, R.M., & Pollner, M. (1988). On the use of members' responses to researchers' accounts. Human Organization, 47, 189-198.
14. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz, The interpretation of cultures (pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books.
15. Gioia, D., Thomas, J., Clark, S., & Chittipeddi, K. (1994). Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence. Organization Science, 5, 363-383.
16. Greenberg, D.S. (2001). Johns Hopkins research returns to normal. The Lancet, 358 (9279). 393.
17. Guba, E.G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 75-92.
18. Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Gunsalus, C.K. (2002, November 15). Rethinking protections for human subjects. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. 16.
20. Gunsalus, C.K. (2003). Human subject protections: Some thoughts on costs and benefits in the humanistic disciplines (Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 03-02). Retrieved January 2004, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=394040orDOI: 10.2139/ssrn.394040
21. Halme, M. (2002). Corporate environmental paradigms in shift: Learning during the course of action at Upm-Kymme. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 1087-1109.
22. Hopkins, M.C. (1993). Is anonymity possible? Writing about refugees in the United States. In C. B. Brettell (Ed.), When they read what we write: The politics of ethnography (pp. 121-130). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
23. Horwitz, R. (1993). Just stories of ethnography authority. In C. Brettell (Ed.), When they read what we write: The politics of ethnography (pp. 131-143). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
24. Kahn, W. (1993). Caring for the caregivers: Patterns of organizational caregiving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 539-563.
25. Kvale, U. (1995). The social construction of validity. Qualitative Research, 1 (1). 19-40.
26. Lincoln, Y.S. (1993). I and thou: Method, voice and roles in research with the silenced. In D. McLaughlin & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Naming silenced lives: Personal narratives and processes of educational change (pp. 29-47). New York: Routledge.
27. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28. Lincoln, Y.S., & Tierney, W. (2004). Qualitative research and institutional review boards. Qualitative Inquiry, 10 (2). 219-234.
29. Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. London: Sage.
30. Marcus, G., & Fischer, M. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Marshall, P.A. (2003). Human subjects protections, institutional review boards and cultural anthropological research. Anthropological Quarterly, 76 (2). 269-285. (Pubitemid 36688494)
32. Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Nelson, C. (2004). The brave new world of research surveillance. Qualitative Inquiry, 10 (2). 207-218.
35. Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth and history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Reason, P. (1998). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 261-291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Reason, P., and Rowan, J. (Eds.). (1981). Human Inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
38. Richardson, L. (1992). Trash on the corner: Ethics and technology. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 21, 103-19.
39. Richter, S. (1988). Field work and the commodification of culture: Why the natives are restless. Review of Canadian Sociology and Anthropology, 23 (3). 406-420.
40. Rochford, E., Jr. (1992). On the politics of member validation: Taking findings back to Hare Krishna. Perspectives on Social Problems, 3, 99-116.
41. Rosaldo, R. (1989). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon.
42. Sackman, S. (1992). Culture and subcultures: An analysis of organizational knowledge. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 140-161.
43. Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretive approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 9-25.
44. Schatzman, L., & Strauss, A. (1973). Field research: Strategies for a natural sociology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45. Schwandt, T.A. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Seale, C. (1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage.
47. Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J., & Silverman, D. (2004). Introduction: Inside qualitative research. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 1-11). London: Sage.
48. Shea, C. (2000). Don't talk to the humans: The crackdown on social science research. Lingua Franca, 10 (6). 126-142.
49. Sieber, J.E. (1992). Planning ethically responsible research: a guide for students and internal review boards. London: Sage.
50. Sieber, J.E., Plattner, S., & Rubin, P. (2002). How (not) to regulate social and behavioral research. Professional Ethics Report, 15 (2). 1-4.
51. Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.
52. Smith, J. (1984). The problem of criteria for judging interpretive inquiry. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6 (4). 379-391.
53. Smith, J. (1992). Interpretive inquiry: A practical and moral activity. Theory Into Practice, 31 (2). 100-106.
54. Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Stewart, A. (1998). The ethnographer's method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56. Strauss, A.L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57. Thorne, B. (1980). ''You still takin' notes?'' Fieldwork and problems of informed consent. Social Problems, 27 (3). 284-297.
58. Tollich, M. (2004). Internal confidentiality: When confidentiality assurances fail relational informants. Qualitative Sociology, 27, 101-106.
59. Schegloff, E.A. (1996). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In B. Fox (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (pp. 437-485). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
60. Wax, M.L. (1982). Research reciprocity rather than informed consent in fieldwork. In J. E. Sieber (Ed.), The ethics of social research: Fieldwork, regulation, and publication (pp. 33-48). New York: Springer.
61. Whitman, G., & Cooper, W. (2000). Ecological embeddedness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1265-1282. (Pubitemid 33216847)
62. Whyte, W.F. (1955). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63. Williamson, G.R., & Prossner, S. (2002). Action research, ethics and participation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40 (5). 587-594.
64. Wolcott, H.F. (2001). Writing up qualitative research (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.