The brave new world of research surveillance

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 207-218

  Nelson, Cary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Institutional review board; IRB; Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646152276     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800403259701     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. American Association of University Professors. (2001). Protecting human beings: Institutional review boards and social science research. Academe, 87(3), 55-67.
2. Anderson, P. V. (1996). Ethics, institutional review boards, and the involvement of human participants in composition research. In P. Mortensen & G. E. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy (pp. 260-285). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
3. Bloom, L. Z. (2003). Living to tell the tale: The complicated ethics of creative nonfiction. College English, 65(3), 276-289.
4. Gunsalus, C. K. (2002, November 15). Rethinking protections for human subjects. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. 16.
5. Knight, J., Blanchard, M. A., Church, J. T., & Shopes, L. (2002, June 17). Should all disciplines be subject to the Common Rule? (Report to the National Human Research Protections Advisory Committee). Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors.
6. Morgan, D. (1998). Ethical issues raised by students' personal writing. College English, 60(3), 318-325.
7. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects in Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
8. Oakes, J. M. (2002). Risks and wrongs in social science research: An evaluator' s guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review, 26(5), 443-478.
9. Sieber, J. E., Plattner, S., & Rubin, P. (2002). How not to regulate social and behavioral research. Professional Ethics Report, 15(2), 1-4.
10. Wright, D. (2002). Writing the real world. Kenyon Review, 24(3-4), 38-48.