The Constitutional Competence of the EU to Deliver Social Justice

European Review of Contract Law

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 136-158

  Weatherill, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649442625     PISSN: 16149920     EISSN: 16149939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ERCL.2006.011     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. S. Weatherill, ‘Competence creep and competence control’ (2004) 23. Yearbook of European Law 1;
2. A. von Bogdandy / J. Bast, ‘The European Union’s Vertical Order of Competences: the Current Law and Proposals for its Reform’ (2002) 39 Common Market Law Review 227.
3. W. Van Gerven, ‘Harmonization of Private law: Do we Need it?’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review 505;
4. Special Issue: The Future of European Private Law (2004) 10/6 European Law Journal, ed H. Collins.
5. Cf K. Nicolaidis / R. Howse (eds), The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union (Oxford: OUP, 2001).
6. with T. Wilhelmsson, ‘The Abuse of the Confident Consumer as a Justification for EC Consumer Law’ (2004)
7. Journal of Consumer Policy 317.
8. S. Weatherill, ‘The European Commission’s Green Paper on European Contract Law: Context, Content and Constitutionality’ (2001) 24 Journal of Consumer Policy 339, 361–371.
9. S. Weatherill, ‘Constitutional Issues – How Much is Best Left Unsaid?’, in S. Vogenauer / S. Weatherill (eds), Harmonisation of European Contract Law: Implications for European Private Laws, Business and Legal Practice (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006).
10. Cf eg M Hesselink, ‘The European Commission’s Action Plan: Towards a More Coherent European Contract Law?’ (2004) 12 European Review Private Law 397.
11. S. Weatherill, ‘Better Competence Monitoring’ (2005) 30 European Law Review 23.
12. th ed, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2003);
13. C. Barnard, The Substantive Law of the EU: the Four Freedoms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).
14. J. Rutgers, ‘The Rule of Reason and Private law or the Limits to Harmonization’, ch 9 in A. Schrauwen (ed), Rule of Reason: Rethinking another Classic of European Legal Doctrine (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2005).
15. Eg E.-M. Kieninger, ‘Securities in Movable Property within the Common Market’ (1996) 4 European Review of Private Law 41.
16. Cf M. Hesselink, ‘Non-Mandatory Rules in European Contract Law’ (2005) 1 European Review of Contract Law 44, 74–76.
17. P. Craig, ‘Competence: Clarity, Conferral, Containment and Consideration’ (2004) 29 European Law Review 323, and n 20 above for comparative perspectives.
18. D. Hanf / T. Baumé, ‘Vers une clarification de la répartition des compétences entre l’Union et ses Etats Membres?’ (2003) 38 Cahiers de Droit Européen 135.
19. Eg Case 3/00 Denmark v Commission [2003] ECR I-2643 (ECJ) (Commission refusal of authorisation annulled by the Court).
20. Case 491/01, n 23 above, para 74–75 of the judgment.
21. M. Dougan, ‘Vive La Différence? Exploring the Legal Framework for Reflexive Harmonisation within the Single European Market’ (2002) 1 Annual of German and European Law 113.
22. OJEC 2002 L 271/16. Cf D. Staudenmayer, ‘The Commission Action Plan on European Contract Law’ (2003) 11 European Review Private Law 113, 122.
23. P. Rott, ‘Consumer Guarantees in the Future Consumer Credit Directive: Mandatory Ban on Consumer Protection?’ (2005) 13 European Review Private Law 383;
24. G. Howells, ‘The Rise of European Consumer Law – whither national consumer law?’ (2006) 28 Sydney Law Review, forthcoming.
25. H.-W. Micklitz / N. Reich / S. Weatherill, ‘EU Treaty Revision and Consumer Protection’ (2004) 27 Journal of Consumer Policy 367.