Automatic extraction of proximal femur contours from calibrated x-ray images using 3D statistical models: An in vitro study

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 213-222

  Dong, Xiao ^a   Zheng, Guoyan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bayesian network; Segmentation; Statistical models; X ray fluoroscopy

Indexed keywords

AIR NAVIGATION; BONE; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; EXTRACTION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; INFERENCE ENGINES; STATISTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; X RAY ANALYSIS;

AUTOMATIC EXTRACTION; BAYESIA N NETWORKS; CONTOUR EXTRACTION; IN-VITRO; MODEL-BASED OPC; PROXIMAL FEMUR; SEGMENTATION; STATISTIC MODELING; X-RAY FLUOROSCOPY; X-RAY IMAGE;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BAYES THEOREM; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CADAVER; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GEOMETRY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IN VITRO STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 67649422194     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.253     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Chen Y, Ee X, Leow WK, et al. Automatic extraction of femur contours from hip X-ray images. In proc. of the first international workshop on Computer Vision for Biomedical Image Applications (CVBIA 2005), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005; 3765: 200-209.
2. de Luis-Garcia R, Martin-Fernandez M, Arribas JI, et al. A fully automatic algorithm for contour detection of bones in hand radiographs using active contours. In proc. of the 2003 International Conference on Image Processing, 2003; part III: 421-424.
3. Roberts MG, Cootes TF, Adams JE. Automatic segmentation of lumbar vertebrae on digitized radiographs using linked active appearance models, Medical Image Understanding and Analysis 2006; part I: 120-124.
4. Gregory JS, Waarsing JH, Day J, et al. Early identification of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hip using an active shape model to quantify changes in bone morphometric features: can hip shape tell us anything about the progression of osteoarthritis? Arthrit Rheumat 2007; 56(11): 3634-3643.
5. Gregory JS, Stewart A, Undrill PE, et al. Bone shape, structure, and density as determinants of osteoporotic hip fracture: a pilot study investigating the combination of risk factors. Invest Radiol 2005; 40(9): 591-597.
6. Gottschling H, Roth M, Schweikard A, et al. Intraoperative, Fluoroscopy-based planning for complex osteotomies of the proximal femur. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2005; 1(3): 67-73.
7. Bartolini F, Carfagni M, Governi L. Model-based extraction of femoral medulla ducts from radiographic images. Image Vision Comput 2004; 22: 173-182.
8. Tian TP, Chen Y, Leow WK, et al. Computing neck - shaft angle of femur for X-ray fracture detection. The 10th international conference on Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns (CAIP 2003), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2003; 2756: 82-89.
9. Benameur S, Mignotte M, Parent S, et al. 3D/2D Registration and segmentation of scoliotic vertebrae using statistical models. Comput Med Imag Graphics 2003; 27(5): 321-337.
10. Zheng G, Gonzalez Ballester MA, Styner M, et al. Reconstruction of patient-specific 3D bone surface from 2D calibrated fluoroscopic images and point distribution model. The 9th international conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2006), Part I, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences 2006; 4190: 25-32.
11. Lamecker H, Wenckebach TH, Hege H-C. Atlas-based 3D-shape reconstruction from X-ray images. The 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2006); part I: 371-374.
12. Tang TS, Ellis RE. 2D/3D deformable registration using a hybrid atlas. The 8th international conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2005), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2005; 3750: 223-230.
13. Behiels G, Vandermeulen D, Maes F, et al. Active shape model-based segmentation of digital X-ray images. The 2nd internatioanl conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 1999), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1999; 1679: 128-137.
14. Howe B, Gururajan A, Sari-Sarraf H, et al. Hierarchical segmentation of cervical and lumbar vertebrae using a customized generalized Hough transform and extensions to active appearance models. Proceedings of the IEEE 6th Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation, March 2004; 182-186.
15. Langs G, Peloschek P, Bischof H. Determining position and fine shape detail in radiological anatomy; pattern recognition. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Symposium of the German Association for Pattern Recognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2003; 2781: 532-539.
16. Seise M, McKenna SJ, Ricketts IW, et al. Probabilistic segmentation of the knee joint from X-ray images. Medical Image Understanding and Analysis 2006; 110-114.
17. de Bruijne M, Nielsen M. Image segmentation by shape particle filtering. The 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2004); part III.
18. Zheng G, Rajamani KT, Nolte L-P. Use of a dense surface point distribution model in a three-stage anatomical shape reconstruction from sparse information for computer assisted orthopaedic surgery: a preliminary study. The 7th Asian Conference on Computer Vision (ACCV 2006). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2006; 3852: 52-60.
19. Ma B, Ellis RE. Surface-based registration with a particle filter. The 7th international conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2004), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2004; 3216: 566-573.
20. Lee MW, Cohen I. Human upper body pose sstimation in static images. The 8th European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV 2004). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2004; 3022: 126-138.
21. Sigal L, Bhatia S, Roth S, et al. Tracking loose-limbed people. The 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2004) part 1: 421-428.
22. Wu Y, Hua G, Yu T. Tracking articulated body by dynamic Markov network, The 9th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV 2003) 1: 1094-1101.
23. Coughlan J, Ferreira S. Finding deformable shapes using loopy belief propagation. The 7th European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV 2002). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2002; 2352: part III: 453-468.
24. Rangarajan A, Coughlan J, Yuille AL. A Bayesian network framework for relational shape matching. The 9th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV 2003) 671-678.
25. Barrett AR, Davies BL, Gomes MP, et al. Preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance for accurate computer-assisted minimally invasive hip resurfacing surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med 2006; 220(7): 759-773.
26. Schumann S, Zheng G, Nolte L-P. Calibration X-ray radiographs and its feasible application for 2D/3D reconstruction of the proximal femur. In proc. of the 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE EMBC'08), 2008; 470-473.
27. Zheng G, Schumann S. 3D reconstruction of a surface model of the proximal femur from digital biplanar radiographs. In proc. of the 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE EMBC'08), 2008; 66-69.
28. Dong X, Zheng G. Fully automatic determination of morphological parameters of proximal femur from calibrated fluoroscopic images through particle filtering. The 3rd International Conference on Image Analysis and Recognition (ICIAR 2006), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2006; 4142: 535-546.
29. Jannin P, Fitzpatrick JM, Hawkes DJ, et al. Validation of medical image processing in image-guided therapy. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2002; 21(12): 1445-1449.
30. Aspert N, Santa-Cruz D, Ebrahimi T. MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance. International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) 2002; 1: 705-708.