The effect of including quantitative heel ultrasound in models for estimation of 10-year absolute risk of fracture

Bone

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 180-184

  Moayyeri, Alireza ^a   Kaptoge, Stephen ^a,b   Dalzell, Nichola ^a   Luben, Robert N ^a   Wareham, Nicholas J ^c   Bingham, Sheila ^d   Reeve, Jonathan ^b   Khaw, Kay Tee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTE OF METABOLIC SCIENCE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Absolute risk; Bone fractures; Dual energy X ray absorptiometry; Epidemiology; Osteoporosis; Quantitative ultrasound

Indexed keywords

AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE; HEEL; HIP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ULTRASOUND;

ADULT; AGED; CALCANEUS; FEMALE; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTORS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 67649416466     PISSN: 87563282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Gluer C.C. Quantitative ultrasound techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis: expert agreement on current status. The International Quantitative Ultrasound Consensus Group. J. Bone Miner. Res. 12 (1997) 1280-1288
2. Krieg M.A., Barkmann R., Gonnelli S., Stewart A., Bauer D.C., Del Rio B.L., et al. Quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions. J. Clin. Densitom. 11 (2008) 163-187
3. Gluer C.C., Wu C.Y., Jergas M., Goldstein S.A., and Genant H.K. Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure. Calcif. Tissue Int. 55 (1994) 46-52
4. Barkmann R., and Gluer C.C. Quantitative ultrasound. In: Grampp S. (Ed). Radiology of osteoporosis (2003), Springer, Berlin
5. Njeh C.F., Hans D., Li J., Fan B., Fuerst T., He Y.Q., et al. Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: precision and hip fracture discrimination. Osteoporos Int. 11 (2000) 1051-1062
6. Damilakis J., Papadokostakis G., Perisinakis K., Maris T., Dimitriou P., Hadjipavlou A., et al. Discrimination of hip fractures by quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry. Eur. J. Radiol. 50 (2004) 268-272
7. Schott A.M., Weill-Engerer S., Hans D., Duboeuf F., Delmas P.D., and Meunier P.J. Ultrasound discriminates patients with hip fracture equally well as dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and independently of bone mineral density. J. Bone Miner Res. 10 (1995) 243-249
8. Ekman A., Michaelsson K., Petren-Mallmin M., Ljunghall S., and Mallmin H. DXA of the hip and heel ultrasound but not densitometry of the fingers can discriminate female hip fracture patients from controls: a comparison between four different methods. Osteoporos Int. 12 (2001) 185-191
9. Turner C.H., Peacock M., Timmerman L., Neal J.M., and Johnson Jr. C.C. Calcaneal ultrasonic measurements discriminate hip fracture independently of bone mass. Osteoporos Int. 5 (1995) 130-135
10. Krieg M.A., Cornuz J., Ruffieux C., Sandini L., Buche D., Dambacher M.A., et al. Comparison of three bone ultrasounds for the discrimination of subjects with and without osteoporotic fractures among 7562 elderly women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 18 (2003) 1261-1266
11. Stewart A., Reid D.M., and Porter R.W. Broadband ultrasound attenuation and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with hip fractures: which technique discriminates fracture risk. Calcif. Tissue Int. 54 (1994) 466-469
12. Gluer C.C., Eastell R., Reid D.M., Felsenberg D., Roux C., Barkmann R., et al. Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: the OPUS Study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 19 (2004) 782-793
13. Bauer D.C., Gluer C.C., Cauley J.A., Vogt T.M., Ensrud K.E., Genant H.K., et al. Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch. Intern. Med. 157 (1997) 629-634
14. Krieg M.A., Cornuz J., Ruffieux C., Van M.G., Buche D., Dambacher M.A., et al. Prediction of hip fracture risk by quantitative ultrasound in more than 7000 Swiss women > or = 70 years of age: comparison of three technologically different bone ultrasound devices in the SEMOF study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 21 (2006) 1457-1463
15. Hans D., rgent-Molina P., Schott A.M., Sebert J.L., Cormier C., Kotzki P.O., et al. Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 348 (1996) 511-514
16. Porter R.W., Miller C.G., Grainger D., and Palmer S.B. Prediction of hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective study. BMJ 301 (1990) 638-641
17. Stewart A., Kumar V., and Reid D.M. Long-term fracture prediction by DXA and QUS: a 10-year prospective study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 21 (2006) 413-418
18. Hans D., Durosier C., Kanis J.A., Johansson H., Schott-Pethelaz A.M., and Krieg M.A. Assessment of the 10-year probability of osteoporotic hip fracture combining clinical risk factors and heel bone ultrasound: the EPISEM prospective cohort of 12,958 elderly women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 23 (2008) 1045-1051
19. Durosier C., Hans D., Krieg M.A., and Schott A.M. Prediction and discrimination of osteoporotic hip fracture in postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Densitom. 9 (2006) 475-495
20. Damilakis J., Maris T.G., and Karantanas A.H. An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques. Eur. Radiol. 17 (2007) 1591-1602
21. Briot K., and Roux C. What is the role of DXA, QUS and bone markers in fracture prediction, treatment allocation and monitoring. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 19 (2005) 951-964
22. Kanis J.A., on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group. Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report. World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Metabolic Bone Disease: University of Sheffield, UK; 2007.
23. Kanis J.A., Johnell O., Oden A., Johansson H., and McCloskey E. FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos. Int. 19 (2008) 385-397
24. Day N., Oakes S., Luben R., Khaw K.T., Bingham S., Welch A., et al. EPIC-Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. European Prospective Investigation of Cancer. Br. J. Cancer 80 Suppl 1 (1999) 95-103
25. Kaptoge S., Welch A., McTaggart A., Mulligan A., Dalzell N., Day N.E., et al. Effects of dietary nutrients and food groups on bone loss from the proximal femur in men and women in the 7th and 8th decades of age. Osteoporos. Int. 14 (2003) 418-428
26. Kaptoge S., Dalzell N., Loveridge N., Beck T.J., Khaw K.T., and Reeve J. Effects of gender, anthropometric variables, and aging on the evolution of hip strength in men and women aged over 65. Bone 32 (2003) 561-570
27. Khaw K.T., Reeve J., Luben R., Bingham S., Welch A., Wareham N., et al. Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men and women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Lancet 363 (2004) 197-202
28. Cox D.R., and Oakes D. Analysis of Survival Data (1984), Chapman and Hall, London
29. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6 (1978) 461-464
30. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 19 (1974) 716-723
31. Spiegelhalter D.J., Best N.G., Carlin B.P., and van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 64 (2002) 583-639
32. Nagelkerke N.J.D. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78 (1991) 692
33. Royston P., and Sauerbrei W. A new measure of prognostic separation in survival data. Stat. Med. 23 (2004) 723-748
34. Harrell Jr. F.E., Lee K.L., Califf R.M., Pryor D.B., and Rosati R.A. Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. Stat. Med. 3 (1984) 143-152
35. Hosmer D.W., and Lemeshow S. Applied Survival Analysis (1999), Wiley, New York
36. Gluer C.C., and Hans D. How to use ultrasound for risk assessment: a need for defining strategies. Osteoporos Int. 9 (1999) 193-195
37. Cepollaro C., Gonnelli S., Pondrelli C., Martini S., Montagnani A., Rossi S., et al. The combined use of ultrasound and densitometry in the prediction of vertebral fracture. Br. J. Radiol. 70 (1997) 691-696
38. Gluer C.C., Cummings S.R., Bauer D.C., Stone K., Pressman A., Mathur A., et al. Osteoporosis: association of recent fractures with quantitative US findings. Radiology 199 (1996) 725-732
39. Frost M.L., Blake G.M., and Fogelman I. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?. Osteoporos. Int. 12 (2001) 471-477
40. Peretz A., De M.V., Moris M., Wouters M., and Bergmann P. Evaluation of quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements in women with and without fractures. J. Clin. Densitom. 2 (1999) 127-133
41. Siminoski K., Leslie W.D., Frame H., Hodsman A., Josse R.G., Khan A., et al. Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada: a shift to absolute fracture risk assessment. J. Clin. Densitom. 10 (2007) 120-123
42. van Staa T.P., Dennison E.M., Leufkens H.G., and Cooper C. Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone 29 (2001) 517-522
43. Brennan nee S.J., Johansen A., Butler J., Stone M., Richmond P., Jones S., et al. Place of residence and risk of fracture in older people: a population-based study of over 65-year-olds in Cardiff. Osteoporos Int. 14 (2003) 515-519
44. Cooper C. Epidemiology and public health impact of osteoporosis. Baillieres Clin. Rheumatol. 7 (1993) 459-477