|
Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 185-191
|
DXA of the hip and heel ultrasound but not densitometry of the fingers can discriminate female hip fracture patients from controls: A comparison between four different methods
a a a a a |
Author keywords
DXA; Heel ultrasound; Hip fracture; Phalangeal ultrasonography; Radiographic absorptiometry
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BONE DENSITY;
BONE MINERAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DENSITOMETRY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY;
ECHOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
FEMUR;
FEMUR NECK FRACTURE;
HEEL;
HIP FRACTURE;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
OSTEOPENIA;
OSTEOPOROSIS;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SCORING SYSTEM;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
BONE DENSITY;
CASE-CONTROL STUDIES;
DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY;
FEMALE;
FEMUR HEAD;
FINGERS;
HEEL;
HIP;
HIP FRACTURES;
HUMANS;
OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 0035074885
PISSN: 0937941X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s001980170128 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (39)
|
References (36)
|