Optimisation of X-ray examinations: General principles and an Irish perspective

Radiography

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 262-268

  Matthews, Kate ^a   Brennan, Patrick C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Acceptance criteria; Performance criteria; Radiation dose; Radiographer responsibility; Radiographic technique

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOSIMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; IRELAND; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIATION EQUIPMENT; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIATION SCATTERING; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REVIEW; STANDARD;

EID: 67649352677     PISSN: 10788174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2008.07.002     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. S.I. No. 478. European communities (medical ionising radiation protection) regulations. Dublin Stationery Office; 2002.
2. ICRP Publication 73. Radiological protection and safety in medicine. Annals of the ICRP 26 2 (2007) 1-31
3. Matthews K., Patrick C., and Brennan. Justification of X-ray examinations: general principles and an Irish perspective. Radiography 14 4 (2008) 349-355
4. ICRP Publication 101. The optimisation of radiological protection: broadening the process. Annals of the ICRP 36 3 (2006) 69-87
5. ICRP Publication 60. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP 21 (1991) 1-3
6. ICRP. History, policies, procedures. Annals of the ICRP 28 1 (1998) 1-29
7. CEU. Council Directive 97/43 Euratom on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionising radiation in relation to medical exposure and repealing Directive 84/466 Euratom (1997), Council of the European Union, Luxembourg
8. S.I. No. 250. European community (radiological and nuclear medicine installations) regulations. Dublin Stationery Office; 1998.
9. S.I. No. 125. Radiological protection act, 1991 (ionising radiation) order. Dublin Stationery Office; 2000.
10. European Commission. Criteria for acceptability of radiological (including radiotherapy) and nuclear medicine installations: radiation protection 91 (1997), OOPEC, Luxembourg
11. IPEM 77. Recommended standards for routine testing of diagnostic X-ray systems. Report 77 (1997), Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, York, UK
12. Fennell S. Manager, Medical, Dental and Veterinary Section, Regulatory Services Division, Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland, 3 Clonskeagh Square, Dublin 1; 2007 (personal communication).
13. McCrudden T, Brennan PC, Matthews K. Performance testing on X-ray equipment used for paediatric radiography in Ireland. In: Proceedings of RSNA; 2004 [1811PD].
14. IPEM 91. Recommended standards for the routine performance testing of diagnostic X-ray imaging systems (2005), Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, York, UK
15. IEC International Standard 601-1-3. Medical electrical equipment - part 1: general requirements for safety. 3: collateral standard: general requirements for radiation protection in diagnostic X-ray equipment. 1st ed. International Electrotechnical Commission 1994-07.
16. IEC International Standard 60601-2-7. Medical electrical equipment - part 2-7: particular requirements for the safety of high-voltage generators of diagnostic X-ray generators. 2nd ed. International Electrotechnical Commission 1998-02.
17. IEC International Standard 60522. Determination of the permanent filtration of X-ray tube assemblies. 2nd ed. International Electrotechnical Commission 1999-02; 2003.
18. IEC International Standard 60336. Medical electrical equipment - X-ray tube assemblies for medical diagnosis - characteristics of focal spots. 4th ed. International Electrotechnical Commission 2005-04.
19. Kepler K., Vladimirov A., and Servomaa A. Interlaboratory comparison and accreditation in quality control testing of diagnostic X-ray equipment. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 114 1-3 (2005) 198-200
20. Mazzocchi S., Belli G., Busoni S., Gori1 C., Menchi I., Salucci P., et al. AEC set up optimisation with computed radiography imaging. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 117 1-3 (2005) 169-173
21. Nikodemová D., Horváthová M., and Salá D. Implementation of QA and QC standards in radiology in Slovakia. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 117 1-3 (2005) 274-276
22. Schreiner-Karoussou A. Dose optimisation in computed radiography. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 117 1-3 (2005) 139-142
23. Faulkner K. The DIMOND project and its impact on radiation protection. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 117 1-3 (2005) 3-6
24. SENTINEL project website. Safety and efficacy for new techniques and imaging using new equipment to support European legislation. Available at [accessed 10th May 2007].
25. Faulkner K, editor. Contract: FIGM-CT-2000-00061. Measures for optimising radiological information and dose in digital imaging and interventional radiology (DIMOND III). Available at [accessed 10th May 2007].
26. ICRP. DRAFT recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection; 2007.
27. Almen A., Tinberg A., Mattsson S., Besjakov J., Kheddache S., Lanhede B., et al. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria. British Journal of Radiology 73 (2000) 1192-1199
28. Grondin Y., Matthews K., McEntee M., Rainford L., Casey M., Tonra M., et al. Dose reducing strategies in combination offers substantial potential benefits to females requiring X-ray examination. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 108 2 (2004) 123-132
29. Almén A., Tingberg A., Besjakov J., and Mattsson S. The use of reference image criteria in X-ray diagnostics: an application for the optimisation of lumbar spine radiographs. European Radiology 14 (2004) 1561-1567
30. McEntee M.F., Brennan P.C., and O'Connor G. The effect of X-ray tube potential on the image quality of PA chest radiographs when using digital image acquisition devices. Radiography 10 (2004) 287-292
31. Launders J.H., Cowen A.R., Bury R.F., and Hawkridge P. Towards image quality, beam energy and effective dose optimisation in digital thoracic radiography. European Radiology 11 5 (2001) 870-875
32. Tingberg A., and Sjöström D. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 114 1-3 (2005) 286-293
33. Doyle P., Martin C.J., and Gentle D. Dose image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 114 1-3 (2005) 269-272
34. Hansson J., Bath M., Hakansson M., Grundin H., Bjurklint E., Orvestad P., et al. An optimisation strategy in a digital environment applied to neonatal chest imaging. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 114 1-3 (2005) 278-285
35. Marshall K. Optimisation of dose per image in digital imaging. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 94 1-2 (2004) 83-87
36. Persliden J., Beckman K.W., Geijer H., and Andersson T. Dose-image optimisation in digital radiology with a direct digital detector: an example applied to pelvic examinations. European Radiology 12 (2002) 1584-1588
37. Peters S.E., and Brennan P.C. Digital radiography: are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index. European Radiology 12 (2002) 2381-2387
38. Hansen J., Jurik A.G., Fiirgaard B., and Egund N. Optimisation of scoliosis examinations in children. Pediatric Radiology 33 (2003) 752-765
39. Roberts J.A., Evans S.C., and Rees M. Optimisation of imaging technique used in direct digital radiography. Journal of Radiological Protection 26 (2006) 287-299
40. Redlich U., Hoeschen C., and Doehring W. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest radiography systems. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 114 1-3 (2005) 264-268
41. Robson K.J., and Kotre C.J. Pilot study into optimisation of viewing conditions for electronically displayed images. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 117 1-3 (2005) 298-303
42. Bath M., Hakansson M., Borjesson S., Kheddache S., Grahn A., Ruschin M., et al. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 114 1-3 (2005) 85-91
43. Hakansson M., Bath M., Borjesson S., Kheddache S., Grahn A., Ruschin M., et al. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the RADIUS chest trial. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 114 1-3 (2005) 114-120
44. Jadva-Patel H. The use of thin metal filters to reduce dose to patients. Radiography Today 57 651 (1991) 18-22
45. Brennan P., and Nash M. Increasing FFD: an effective dose reducing tool for lateral lumbar spine investigations. Radiography 4 (1998) 251-259
46. Brennan P.C., and Hourihan S.P. The cost effectiveness of carbon fibre cassettes in mobile chest radiography. European Radiology 8 (1998) 301-305
47. Nic an Ghearr F.A., and Brennan P.C. The PA projection of the abdomen: a dose reducing technique. Radiography 4 (1998) 195-203
48. Brennan P.C., and Madigan E. Lumbar spine radiology: analysis of the postero-anterior projection. European Radiology 10 (2000) 1197-1201
49. Norrman E., and Persliden J. A factorial experiment on image quality and radiation dose. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 114 1-3 (2005) 246-252
50. Roshan S., Livingstone B.S., Peace T., Sunny S., and Victor Raj D. Fine tuning of work practices of common radiological investigations performed using computed radiography system. Radiography 13 (2007) 126-132
51. Lanhede B., Kheddache S., Sund P., Bjorneld P., Widell M., Alme N., et al. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria. British Journal of Radiology 75 (2002) 38-49
52. European Commission. Referral guidelines for imaging: radiation protection 118 (2001), OOPEC, Luxembourg
53. European Commission. EUR 16260: European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images (1996), OOPEC, Luxembourg
54. Medical Council. Protocols for standard radiological practice - good practice guidelines as defined by SI 478 of 2002 (2004), Irish Medical Council. http://www.medicalcouncil.ie/medical_ionising_radiation/default.asp [accessed 16th April 2007]
55. Brennan P.C., and Johnston D. Irish X-ray departments demonstrate varying levels of adherence to European guidelines on good radiographic technique. British Journal of Radiology 75 (2002) 243-248