Justification of x-ray examinations: General principles and an Irish perspective

Radiography

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 349-355

  Matthews, Kate ^a   Brennan, Patrick C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Medical Exposure Directive; Practitioner; Prescriber; Radiographer responsibility; Referral criteria

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHER; REVIEW;

EID: 52449124856     PISSN: 10788174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2008.01.004     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. SI No 478 European Communities (medical ionising radiation protection) regulations (2002), Dublin Stationery Office
2. HPC. Standards of proficiency (2003), Radiographers Health Professions Council, London
3. CEU. Council Directive 97/43 Euratom on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionising radiation in relation to medical exposure and repealing Directive 84/466 Euratom (1997), Council of the European Union, Luxembourg
4. ICRP. History, policies, procedures. Ann ICRP 28 Suppl. 1 (1998) 1-29
5. Saunders P. Radiation and you (1990), OOPEC, Luxembourg
6. ICRP Draft recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection 2007.
7. ICRP. Publication 60. 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 21 (1991) 1-3
8. ICRP. Publication 73. Radiological protection and safety in medicine. Ann ICRP 26 2 (1997) 1-31
9. ICRP. Publication 99. Low dose extrapolation of radiation-related cancer risk. Ann ICRP 35 4 (2005) 1-140
10. Martin C.J. The LNT model provides the best approach for practical implementation of radiation protection. Br J Radiol 78 (2005) 14-16
11. Medical Council. Protocols for standard radiological practice - good practice guidelines as defined by SI 478 of 2002 (2004), Irish Medical Council. [accessed 16.04.07]
12. European Commission. EUR 16260 EN European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images (1996), OOPEC, Luxembourg
13. European Commission. EUR 16261 EN: European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in paediatrics (1996), OOPEC, Luxembourg
14. Almen A., Tinberg A., Mattsson S., Besjakov J., Kheddache S., Lanhede B., et al. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria. Br J Radiol 73 (2000) 1192-1199
15. Brennan P.C., and Johnston D. Irish X-ray departments demonstrate varying levels of adherence to European guidelines on good radiographic technique. Br J Radiol 75 (2002) 243-248
16. Brennan P.C., McDonnell S., and O'Leary D. Increasing film-focus distance (ffd) reduces radiation dose for X-ray examinations. Rad Protect Dosimetry 108 3 (2004) 263-268
17. McVey G., Sandborg M., Dance D.R., and Carlsson A.L.M. A study and optimization of lumbar spine X-ray imaging systems. Br J Radiol 76 (2003) 177-188
18. Offiah A.C., and Hall C.M. Evaluation of the Commission of the European Communities quality criteria for the paediatric lateral spine. Br J Radiol 76 (2003) 885-890
19. Vano E., Oliete S., Gonzalez L., Guibelalde E., Velasco A., and Fernandez J.M. Image quality and dose in lumbar spine examinations: results of a 5 year quality control programme following the European quality criteria trial. Br J Radiol 68 (1995) 1332-1335
20. Axelsson B., Petersen U., and Wiltz H.J. Digital skeletal radiography. Reduction of absorbed dose by adaptation of exposure factors and image processing. Acta Radiol 42 6 (2001) 592-598
21. Bacher K., Smeets P., Bonnarens K., De Hauwere A., Verstraete K., and Thierens H. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed. Am J Roentgenol 181 (2003) 923-929
22. Hufton A.P., Doyle S.M., and Carty H.M. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction. Br J Radiol 71 (1998) 186-199
23. Neofotistou V., Tsapaki V., Kottou S., Schreiner-Karoussou A., and Vano E. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 117 1-3 (2005) 204-210
24. Schreiner-Karoussou A. Dose optimisation in computed radiography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 117 1-3 (2005) 139-142
25. Tingberg A., and Sjöström D. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 114 1-3 (2005) 286-293
26. European Commission. Referral guidelines for imaging: radiation protection 118 (2001), OOPEC, Luxembourg
27. IIR Web site of the Irish Institute of Radiography, available from: [accessed 20.04.07].
28. Armstrong J. Directive aims to cut X-rays. Irish Times (7th January 2000) p. 55
29. Houston M. New EU law aims to stop patients having unnecessary X-rays. Irish Times (1st May 2000) p. 8
30. Murray L. Do you really need that X-ray? (2002). [accessed 24.04.07]
31. Oxman A.D., Fretheim A., and Schünemann H.J. [SURE] Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: introduction. Health Res Pol Syst 4 (2006) 12
32. RCR. Making the best use of a department of clinical radiology: guidelines for doctors. 5th ed. (2003), Royal College of Radiologists, London
33. Needham G. Guidelines not directives. Br J Radiol 75 (2002) 565-566
34. Goddard P. Guidelines: commentary and controversy. Br J Radiol 75 (2002) 291-292
35. Polmear A.F., Kenney I.J., and Barnard S.A. Should GPs have direct access to imaging for children with urinary tract infections? An observational study. Br J Gen Pract 49 (1999) 115-117
36. Chisholm R. Editorial radiology guidelines. Clin Radiol 52 (1997) 409-411
37. Kerry S., Oakeshott P., Dundas D., and Williams J. Influence of postal distribution of The Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines, together with feedback on radiological referral rates, on X-ray referrals from general practice: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract 17 (2000) 46-52
38. Morgan B., Mullick S., Harper W.M., and Finlay D.B. An audit of knee radiographs performed for general practitioners. Br J Radiol 70 (1997) 256-260
39. Smith T. Evidence based medical imaging (EBMI). Radiography 14 (2008) 233-237
40. Hampton J.R. Guest editorial: from evidence to guidelines. Radiography 6 (2000) 75-77
41. Dhingsa R., Finlay D.B.L., Robinson G.D., and Lidicoat A.J. Assessment of agreement between general practitioners and radiologists as to whether a radiation exposure is justified. Br J Radiol 75 (2002) 136-139
42. Medical Council. Policy document on the use of medical ionising radiation (2005), Irish Medical Council. [accessed 16.04.07]
43. IIR. Authorisation of procedures: clinical guidelines (1999), Irish Institute of Radiography, Dublin
44. Triantopoulou Ch., Tsalafoutas I., Maniatis P., Papavdis D., Raios G., Siafas I., et al. Analysis of radiological examination request forms in conjunction with justification of X-ray exposures. Eur J Radiol 53 (2005) 306-311
45. Bell R.E., and McLaughlin R.E. Ionising radiation (medical exposure) regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000 and their implications for accident and emergency (A&E) doctors in training. Ulster Med J 70 No. 1 (2001) 19-21
46. Morris-Stiff G., Stiff R.E., and Morris-Stiff H. Abdominal radiograph requesting in the setting of acute abdominal pain: temporal trends and appropriateness of requesting 1. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88 3 (2006) 270-274 [Abstract only]
47. Kenneally C. An investigation of the clinical information provided on requests for lumbar spine radiography: project dissertation presented for final year examination of the degree of Bachelor of Science (radiography), University College Dublin, Summer Examination 2006. Available from Room A223, Health Sciences, UCD Belfield.
48. Loy C.T., and Irwig L. Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information - a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc 292 13 (2004) 1602-1609
49. Rickett A.B., Finlay D.B., and Jagger C. The importance of clinical details when reporting accident and emergency radiographs. Injury 23 7 (1992) 458-460
50. Larsson W., Aspelin P., Bergquist M., Hillerga K., Jacobsson B., Lindsko L., et al. The effects of PACS on radiographer's work practice. Radiography (2006) 1-6
51. Bury B. X-ray dose training: are we exposed to enough?. Clin Radiol 59 (2004) 926-927
52. Jacob K., Vivian G., and Steel J.R. X-ray dose training: are we exposed to enough?. Clin Radiol (2004) 928-934