Detennining optimum amount of effective factors in automobile brake drum rotatory torque using response surface methodology

Journal of Applied Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 23, 2008, Pages 4390-4396

  Amiri, M ^a   Kazemi, A ^a   Hadipour, H ^a   Azizmohammadi, R ^a  

^a ALLAMEH TABATABA'I UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Axle assy; Design of experiment; Quality control; Response surface methodology; Response variable

Indexed keywords

ASSEMBLING PROCESS; AUTOMOBILE BRAKES; CONTROL EXPERIMENTS; CRUCIAL FUNCTIONS; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; INTERNAL DIAMETERS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; RESPONSE VARIABLE;

AUTOMOBILES; AXLES; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY CONTROL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TORQUE;

BRAKES;

EID: 67649283052     PISSN: 18125654     EISSN: 18125662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2008.4390.4396     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Amiri, M. and I. Salehi, 2007. A methodology for optimizing statistical multi-response problems using goal programming. Scientia Iranica, 15: 389-397.
2. Amiri, M., K. Gheshlaghi and H. Kiyomarsi, 2007. Application of design of experiments (DOE), Response surface methodology (RSM), Multi objective decision making (MODM) in effective quality characteristic improvement. J. Tehran Univ.,
3. Chun, B.K., J.T. Jinn and J.K. Lee, 2002. Modeling the bauschinger effect for sheet metals, Part 1: Theory. Int J. Plastic., 18: 597-616.
4. Dalvi, V.B., K.N. Tiwari, M.N. Pawade and P.S. Phirke, 1999. Response surface analysis of tomato production under microirrigation. Agric. Water Manage., 41: 11-19.
5. Marklund, P.O. and L. Nilsson, 2001. Optimization of a car body component subjected to side impact. Struc. Multidiscip. Optim., 21: 383-392.
6. Myers, RH. and D.C. Montgomery, 2002. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiment. 2nd Edn., JohnWiley and Sons, New York, ISBN: 978-0-47141255-7.
7. Neter, J., M.H. Kunter, W. Wasserman and C.J. Nachtsheim, 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Methods. 4th Edn., McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, ISBN: 9780130410207.
8. Noorosana, R. and H. Sultanpenah, 2003. Offering a method for extracting D.M function and using it for the multi-purpose optimization within the framework of RSM. Int J. Eng. Sci., 15: 221-233.
9. Noorosana, R., 2005. The presentation of methodology to obtain the decision function for multiple-response optimizing in response surface methodology. Amirkabir J. Sci. Tech., 60: 25-37.
10. Pasandideh, S.H.R. and S.T.A. Niaki, 2006. Multi-response simulation optimization using genetic algorithm within desirability function framework. Applied Math. Comput., 175: 366-382.
11. Rezzoug, S.A., C. Botekedjiret and K. Allaf, 2005. Optimization of operating conditions of rosemary oil extraction by fast controlled pressure drop process using response surface methodology. J. Food Eng., 71:9-17.
12. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., S. Kodiyalam and R.J. Yang, 2001. Optimization of car body under constraints of noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) and crash. Struc. Multidiscip. Optim., 22: 295-306.