The place of persuasion in shared decision making: A contextual approach. A response to Eggly

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 12-13

  Karnieli Miller, Orit ^a   Eisikovits, Zvi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; MEDICINE;

ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MARKETING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;

EID: 67649262107     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.029     Document Type: Note

References (19)

1. Arksey H., and Knight P. Interviewing for social scientists (1999), Sage, London
2. Brown R.F., Butow P.N., Butt D.G., Moore A.R., and Tattersall M.H.N. Developing ethical strategies to assist oncologists in seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials. Social Science & Medicine 58 2 (2004) 379-390
3. Charles C., Gafni A., and Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science & Medicine 49 (1999) 651-661
4. Denzin N.K. The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (1970), Butterworths, London
5. Eggly S., Penner L., Albrecht T.L., Cline R.J.W., Foster T., Naughton M., et al. Discussing bad news in the outpatient oncology clinic: rethinking current communication guidelines. Journal of Clinical Oncology 24 4 (2006) 716-719
6. Eggly S. Can physicians both persuade and partner? A commentary on Karnieli-Miller and Eisikovits. Social Science & Medicine 69 1 (2009) 9-11
7. Forbat L. Relationship difficulties in dementia care: a discursive analysis of two women's accounts. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice 2 1 (2003) 67-84
8. Green C., and Gilhooly K. Protocol analysis: practical implementation. In: Richardson J.T.E. (Ed). Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences (1996), The British Psychological Society, Leicester 55-74
9. Henderson J., and Forbat L. Relationship based social policy: personal and policy constructions of care. Critical Social Policy 22 4 (2002) 665-683
10. Jones A., and Bugge C. Improving understanding and rigour through triangulation: an exemplar based on patient participation in interaction. Journal of Advanced Nursing 55 5 (2006) 612-621
11. Karnieli-Miller O., and Eisikovits Z. Physician as partner or salesman? Shared decision-making in real-time encounters. Social Science & Medicine 69 1 (2009) 1-8
12. Moran-Ellis J., Alexander V.D., Cronin A., Fielding M., Sleney J., and Thomas H. Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research 6 1 (2006) 45-59
13. Mason J. Qualitative researching (2002), Sage Publications, London
14. Song M. Hearing competing voices. In: Ribbens J., and Edwards R. (Eds). Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research (1998), Sage, London 103-118
15. Tannenbaum F. Crime and the community (1938), Columbia University Press, New York
16. Thompson A.G.H. The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy. Social Science & Medicine 64 (2007) 1297-1310
17. Towle A., and Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. British Medical Journal 319 (1999) 766-769
18. Whitney S.N., Ethier A.M., Frugé E., Berg S., McCullough L.B., and Hockenberry M. Decision-making in pediatric oncology: who should take the lead? The decisional priority in pediatric oncology model. Journal of Clinical Oncology 24 1 (2006) 160-165
19. Whitney S.N., McGuire A.L., and McCullough L.B. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Annals of Internal Medicine 140 1 (2004) 54-59