Pancreatic surgery in a regional hospital;Pankreaschirurgie an einem krankenhaus der grund- und regelversorgung

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie - Zeitschrift fur Allgemeine, Viszeral- und Gefasschirurgie

Volumn 134, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 160-165

  Calasan, I ^a   Junger, M ^a   Schwendtner, P ^a   Pommer, S ^b   Schoenberg, M H ^a  

^a Chirurgische Abteilung   (Germany)

^b Krankenhaus Burglengenfeld   (Germany)

Author keywords

German national survey; Hospital volume; Pancreatic surgery; Volume outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; GENERAL HOSPITAL; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS RESECTION; PANCREAS TUMOR; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; STATISTICS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; GERMANY; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HOSPITALS, GENERAL; HOSPITALS, PUBLIC; HOSPITALS, SPECIAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; SURGERY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

EID: 67649238177     PISSN: 0044409X     EISSN: 14389592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1098707     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138: 8-13
2. Beger HG, Kunz R, Poch B. The Beger procedure-duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8: 1090-1097
3. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Ko CY et al. Multimodality therapy for pancreatic cancer in the U.S. Utilization, outcomes, and the effect of hospital volume. Cancer 2007; 110: 1227-1234
4. Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Staiger DO. Operativemortality and procedure volume as predictors of subsequent hospital performance. Ann Surg 2006; 243: 411-417
5. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1128-1137
6. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2117-2127
7. Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Goldfaden A et al. Volume and process of care in high-risk cancer surgery. Cancer 2006; 106: 2476-2481
8. Chikh-Torab F, Shugaa A, Schoenberg MH et al. Cattell-Warren anastomosis in soft pancreatic remnant after pancreatic resection. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 1996; 113: 249-251
9. Dasgupta R, Kim PCW. Relationship between surgical volume and clinical outcome: should pediatric surgeons be doing pancreaticoduodenectomies? Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2005; 40: 793-796
10. Dixon E, Vollmer Jr CM, Bathe O et al. Training, practice, and referral patterns in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: Survey of General Surgeons. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 109-114
11. Finlayson EVA, Birkmeyer JD. Effects of hospital volume on life expectancy after selected cancer operations in older adults: A decision analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196: 410-417
12. Finlayson EVA, Goodney PP, Birkmeier JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 721-725
13. Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D et al. Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 540-547
14. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Vereinbarung des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses. Neufassung vom November 2007, Bundesanzeiger 2008, S.128
15. Geraedts M. Evidenz zur Ableitung von Mindestmengen in der Medizin. Gutachten im Auftrag der Bundesärztekammer. 2004, online Veröffentlichung auf www.bundesaerztekammer.de
16. Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Bass EB et al. Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189: 46-56
17. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factor and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 786-795
18. Ho V, Heslin MJ. Effect of hospital volume and experience on in-hospital mortality for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 509-514
19. Keck T, Makowiec F, Adam U et al. Beeinflussen Mindestmengen die Ergebnisse der Pankreaschirurgie? Zentralbl Chir 2007; 132: 26-31
20. Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M et al. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 638-645
21. Makowiec F, Post S, Saeger HD et al. Current practice patterns in pancreatic surgery: results of a multi-institutional analysis of seven large surgical departments in Germany with 1454 pancreatic head resections, 1999 to 2004 (German Advanced Surgical Treatment Study Group). J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 1080-1087
22. Nordback L, ParviainenM, Raty S et al. Resection of the head of the pancreas in Finland: effects of hospital and surgeon on short-term and long-term results. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 1454-1460
23. Roeder N, Wenke A, Heumann M et al. Mindestmengen Konsequenzen der Festlegung von Schwellenwerten für chirurgische Leistungen. Chirurg 2007; 78: 1018-1027
24. Simunovic M, To T, Langer B. Influence of hospital volume on mortality following major cancer surgery. JAMA 1999; 281: 1374-1375
25. Sosa JA, Bowman BJ, Gordon TA et al. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 429-438
26. van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ et al. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic reviewand an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 781-790
27. Vollmer Jr CM, Pratt W, Vanounou T et al. Quality assessment in high-acuity surgery - volume and mortality are not enough. Arch Surg 2007; 142: 371-380
28. Weitz J, Koch M, Kleeff J et al. Kausch-Whipple pancreaticduodenectomy. Technique and results. Chirurg 2004; 75: 1113-1119