Populations of Xanthomonas citri pv. mangiferaeindicae from asymptomatic mango leaves are primarily endophytic

Microbial Ecology

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 170-178

  Pruvost, Olivier ^a   Savelon, Caroline ^a   Boyer, Claudine ^a   Chiroleu, Frédéric ^a   Gagnevin, Lionel ^a   Jacques, Marie Agnès ^b  

^a CIRAD   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); XANTHOMONAS; XANTHOMONAS CITRI;

CHLOROFORM;

ARTICLE; BIOFILM; DRUG EFFECT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MANGO; MICROBIOLOGY; PLANT DISEASE; PLANT LEAF; XANTHOMONAS;

BIOFILMS; CHLOROFORM; MANGIFERA; PLANT DISEASES; PLANT LEAVES; XANTHOMONAS;

EID: 67649223262     PISSN: 00953628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-008-9480-x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ah-You N, Gagnevin L, Chiroleu F, Jouen E, Neto JR, Pruvost O (2007) Pathological variations within Xanthomonas campestris pv. mangiferaeindicae support its separation into three distinct pathovars that can be distinguished by Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism. Phytopathology 97:1568-1577.
2. Ah-You N, Gagnevin L, Grimont PAD, Brisse S, Nesme X, Chiroleu F, Bui Thi Ngoc L, Jouen E, Lefeuvre P, Vernière C, Pruvost O (2009) Polyphasic characterization of xanthomonads pathogenic to Anacardiaceae and their relatedness to different Xanthomonas species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.65453-0.
3. Bashan Y, Sharon E, Okon Y, Henis Y (1981) Scanning electron and light microscopy of infection and symptom development in tomato leaves infected with Pseudomonas tomato. Physiol Plant Pathol 19:139-144.
4. Beattie GA, Lindow SE (1999) Bacterial colonization of leaves: a spectrum of strategies. Phytopathology 89:353-359.
5. Darsonval A, Darrasse A, Meyer D, Demarty M, Durand K, Bureau C, Manceau C, Jacques MA (2008) Type III secretion system of Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. fuscans is involved in phyllosphere colonization process and in transmission to seeds of susceptible bean. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2669-2678.
6. Dodd JC, Prusky D, Jeffries P (1997) Fruit diseases. In: Litz RE (ed) The mango: botany, production and uses. CAB International, Oxon, pp 257-291.
7. Dunger G, Relling VM, Tondo ML, Barreras M, Ielpi L, Orellano EG, Ottado J (2007) Xanthan is not essential for pathogenicity in citrus canker but contributes to Xanthomonas epiphytic survival. Arch Microbiol 188:127-135.
8. Gagnevin L, Leach JE, Pruvost O (1997) Genomic variability of the Xanthomonas pathovar mangiferaeindicae, agent of mango bacterial black spot. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:246-253.
9. Gagnevin L, Pruvost O (2001) Epidemiology and control of mango bacterial black spot. Plant Dis 85:928-935.
10. Graham JH, Gottwald TR, Cubero J, Achor DS (2004) Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri: factors affecting successful eradication of citrus canker. Mol Plant Pathol 5:1-15.
11. Haefele DM, Lindow SE (1987) Flagellar motility confers epiphytic fitness advantages upon Pseudomonas syringae. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:2528-2533.
12. Hirano SS, Upper CD (2000) Bacteria in the leaf ecosystem with emphasis on Pseudomonas syringae-a pathogen, ice nucleus, and epiphyte. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:624-653.
13. Ishimaru C, Eskridge KM, Vidaver AK (1991) Distribution analyses of naturally occurring epiphytic populations of Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli on dry beans. Phytopathology 81:262-268.
14. Jacques MA, Josi K, Darrasse A, Samson R (2005) Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli var. fuscans is aggregated in stable biofilm population sizes in the phyllosphere of field-grown beans. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2008-2015.
15. Kishun R (1982) Loss in mango fruit due to bacterial canker Xanthomonas mangiferaeindicae. In: Lozano JC (ed) Plant pathogenic bacteria. C.I.A.T., Cali, pp 181-184.
16. Leben C (1965) Epiphytic microorganisms in relation to plant disease. Annu Rev Phytopathol 3:209-230.
17. Lindow SE, Brandl MT (2003) Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1875-1883.
18. Madden LV (2006) Botanical epidemiology: some key advances and its continuing role in disease management. Eur J Plant Pathol 115:3-23.
19. Manicom BQ (1986) Factors affecting bacterial black spot of mangoes caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. mangiferaeindicae. Ann Appl Biol 109:129-135.
20. Monier JM, Lindow SE (2004) Frequency, size, and localization of bacterial aggregates on bean leaf surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:346-355.
21. Morris CE, Monier JM, Jacques MA (1998) A technique to quantify the population size and composition of the biofilm component in communities of bacteria in the phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:4789-4795.
22. Ploetz RC, Prakash O (1997) Foliar, floral and soilborne diseases. In: Litz RE (ed) The mango: botany, production and uses. CAB International, Oxon, pp 281-327.
23. Poplawsky AR, Chun W (1998) Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris requires a functional pigB for epiphytic survival and host infection. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 11:466-475.
24. Poplawsky AR, Urban SC, Chun W (2000) Biological role of xanthomonadin pigments in Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5123-5127.
25. Prakash O, Misra AK (1992) Important diseases of mango and their effect on production. Biol Memoirs 18:39-55.
26. Pruvost O, Roumagnac P, Gaube C, Chiroleu F, Gagnevin L (2005) New media for the semi-selective isolation and enumeration of Xanthomonas campestris pv. mangiferaeindicae, the causal agent of mango bacterial black spot. J Appl Microbiol 99:803-815.
27. Rai R, Vatsala P (1985) Epidermal morphology and stomatal development in Anacardiaceae. Acta Hort 108:237-246.
28. Rigano LA, Siciliano F, Enrique R, Sendin L, Filippone P, Torres PS, Questa J, Dow JM, Castagnaro AP, Vojnov AA, Marano MR (2007) Biofilm formation, epiphytic fitness, and canker development in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 20:1222-1230.
29. Rudolph K (1993) Infection of the plant by Xanthomonas. In: Swings JG, Civerolo EL (eds) Xanthomonas. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 193-264.
30. Schneider RW, Grogan RG (1977) Tomato leaf trichomes, a habitat for resident populations of Pseudomonas tomato. Phytopathology 67:898-902.
31. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman, W. H. & Co., San Francisco.
32. Spurr HWJ (1979) Ethanol treatment. Available technique for foliage biocontrol studies of plant disease. Phytopathology 69:773-776.
33. Stall RE, Gottwald TR, Koizumi M, Schaad NC (1993) Ecology of plant pathogenic xanthomonads. In: Swings JG, Civerolo EL (eds) Xanthomonas. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 265-299.
34. Timmer LW, Zitko SE, Gottwald TR (1996) Population dynamics of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri on symptomatic and asymptomatic citrus leaves under various environmental conditions., Vol. In: Manicom B, Robinson J, Du Plessis SF, Joubert P, van Zyl JL, Du Preez S (eds) Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture. vol. 1. International Society of Citriculture, Sun City, pp 448-451.
35. Vernière C, Devaux M, Pruvost O, Couteau A, Luisetti J (1991) Studies on the biochemical and physiological variations among strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri, the causal agent of citrus bacterial canker disease. Fruits 46:162-170.
36. Wichmann G, Bergelson J (2004) Effector genes of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria promote transmission and enhance other fitness traits in the field. Genetics 166:693-706.
37. Wilson M, Hirano SS, Lindow SE (1999) Location and survival of leaf-associated bacteria in relation to pathogenicity and potential for growth within the leaf. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1435-1443.
38. Xu KD, McFeters GA, Stewart PS (2000) Biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Microbiology-UK 146:547-549.