Understanding alliance evolution: Establishing a new research agenda

Journal on Chain and Network Science

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 51-54

  Kumar, Rajesh ^a   Duysters, Geert ^b   Das, T ^c  

^a AARHUS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS   (Denmark)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649204262     PISSN: 15691829     EISSN: 22244662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3920/JCNS2005.x054     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Andersen, P., 1999. Complexity theory and organization science. Organ. Sci. 10, 216-232.
2. Arino, A. and J. Reuer, 2004. Designing and renegotiating strategic alliance contracts. Acad. Manage. Exec. 18, 37-48.
3. Bruner, R. and R. Spekman, 1998. The dark side of alliances: Lessons from Volvo-Renault. European Management Journal 16, 136-150.
4. Caldart, A. and J.E. Ricart, 2004. Corporate strategy revisited: A view from complexity theory. European Management Review 1, 96-104.
5. Cauley de la Sierra, M., 1995. Managing global alliances: Key steps for successful collaboration. Wokingham, UK, Addison Wesley.
6. Das, T.K. and B. Teng, 2000. Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organ. Sci. 11, 77-101.
7. Das, T.K. and B. Teng, 2002a. Alliance constellations: A social exchange perspective. Acad. Manage. Rev. 27, 445-456.
8. Das, T.K. and B. Teng, 2002b. The dynamics of alliance conditions in the alliance development process. J. Manage. Stud. 39, 725-746.
9. De Rond, M. 2003. Strategic alliances as social facts : Business, biotechnology, and intellectual history. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
10. Duysters, G., K.H. Heimeriks and J.A. Jurriens, 2003. Three levels of alliance management. Working paper.
11. Eindhoven, Netherlands, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies.
12. Holland, J.H. and J.H. Miller, 1991. Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory. Am. Econ. Rev. 81, 365-370.
13. Korine, H., K. Asakawa and P.Y. Gomez, 2002. Partnering with the unfamiliar: Lessons from the case of Renault and Nissan. Business Strategy Review 13, 41-50.
14. Marrewijk, A.F., 2004. Crisis in the transition of telecom alliance Unisource. Journal of Managerial Psychology 19, 235-251.
15. Park, S.H. and G.R. Ungson, 2001. Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: A conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organ. Sci. 12, 37-53.
16. Pekar, P. and R. Allio, 1994. Making alliances work: guidelines for success. Long Range Plann. 27, 54-65.
17. Pyka, A. and P. Windrum, 2003. The self organisation of strategic alliances. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12, 245-268.
18. Stacey, R.D., 1995. The science of complexity: An alternative perspective on strategic change processes. Strategic Manage. J. 16, 477-495.
19. Watkins, M., 1999. Negotiating in a complex world. Negotiation J. 15, 245-270.
20. Yoshino, M.Y. and P.L. Fagan, 2003. The Renault-Nissan alliance Case # 9-303-023. Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Publishing.
21. Yoshino, M.Y. and U.S. Rangan, 1995. Strategic alliances: An entrepreneurial approach to globalization. Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press.