Verification of necessity for bioaugmentation - Lessons from two batch case studies for bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soils

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 84, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 808-819

  Liu, Pao Wen Grace ^a   Whang, Liang Ming ^b   Chang, Tsung Chain ^b   Tseng, I Cheng ^b   Pan, Po Tseng ^b   Cheng, Sheng Shung ^b  

^a CHUNG HWA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Bioaugmentation; Microarray; Microbial ecology; Total petroleum hydrocarbons; TRFLP

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL COMMUNITY; BACTERIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; BIO SURFACTANT; BIOAUGMENTATION; BIOSTIMULATION; CASE II; CONTROL BATCH; CONTROLLED LABORATORIES; DEGRADATION RATE CONSTANTS; DIESEL-CONTAMINATED SOIL; FIRST ORDER KINETICS; INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; MICROBIAL ECOLOGY; OPTIMAL STRATEGIES; REMEDIATION PROJECTS; RHAMNOLIPID; TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS; TRFLP;

BACTERIOLOGY; BIOREMEDIATION; ECOLOGY; HYDROCARBONS; INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; PETROLEUM CHEMISTRY; RATE CONSTANTS; SOIL POLLUTION; SOILS; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

DEGRADATION;

BIOSURFACTANT; DIESEL FUEL; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE; PETROLEUM DERIVATIVE; RHAMNOLIPID;

ARTICLE; BATCH PROCESS; BIOREMEDIATION; CASE STUDY; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; INOCULATION; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING; NONHUMAN; ORGANIC NUTRIENT; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; SOIL POLLUTION CONTROL; SOIL PROPERTY; SOIL TREATMENT;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 67649196113     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2153     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Balba MT, Al-Awadhi N and Al-Daher R, Bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil: microbiological methods for feasibility assessment and field evaluation. J Microbiol Methods 32:155-164 (1998).
2. Mishira S, Jyot J, Kuhad RC and Lal B, Evaluation of inoculum addition to stimulate in situ bioremediation of oily-sludge-contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1675-1681 (2001).
3. Boopathy R, Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Bioresources Technol 74:63-67 (2000).
4. Mohn WW and Stewart GR, Limiting factors for hydrocarbon biodegradation at low temperature in Arctic soils. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1161-1172 (2000).
5. Mohn WW, Radziminski CZ, Fortin M-C and Reimer KJ, On site bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated Arctic tundra soils in inoculated biopiles. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 57:242-247 (2001).
6. MacNaughton SJ, Stephen JR, Venosa AD, Davis GA, Chang YJ and While DC, Microbial population changes during bioremediation of an experimental oil spill. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3566-3574 (1999).
7. Eriksson M, Dalhammar G and Borg-Karlson AK, Aerobic degradation of a hydrocarbon mixture in natural uncontaminated potting soil by indigenous microorganisms at 20°C and 6°C. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:532-535 (1999).
8. Forsyth JV, Tsao YM and Bleam RD, Bioremediation: when is bioaugmentation needed? in Bioaugmentation for Site Remediation, ed by Hinchee RE, Fredickson J and Alleman BC. Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, USA, pp 1-14 (1995).
9. Venosa AD, Suidan MT, Haines JR, Wrenn BA, Strohmeir KL, Eberhart Looye BL, et al. Bioremediation of an experimental oil spill on the shoreline of Delaware Bay. Environ Sci Technol 30:1764-1775 (1996).
10. Margesin R and Schinner F, Efficiency of indigenous and inoculated cold-adapted soil microorganisms for biodegradation of diesel oil in alpine soils. Appl Environ Microbio 63:2660-2664 (1997).
11. Kriipsalu M, Marques M, Nammaria DR and HoglandW, Bio-treatment of oily sludge: The contribution of amendment material to the content of target contaminants, and the biodegradation dynamics. J Hazard Mater 148:616-622 (2007).
12. Jurgensen KS, Puustinen J and Suortti AM, Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil by composting in biopiles. Environ Pollut 107:245-254 (2000).
13. Thomassin-Lacroix EJM, Eriksson M, Reimer KJ and Mohn WW, Biostimulation and bioaugmentation for on-site treatment of weathered diesel fuel in Arctic soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 5:551-556 (2002).
14. Alexander M, Biodegradation and Bioremediation, 2nd edn. Academic, San Diego, USA (1999).
15. Van Hamme JD, Singh A andWard OP, Recent advances in petroleum microbiology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:503-49 (2003).
16. Philp JC and Atlas RM, Bioremediation of contaminated soils and aquifers. in Bioremediation: Applied Microbial Solutions for Real-world Environmental Cleanup, ed by Atlas RM and Philp J. ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp 194-195 (2005).
17. Kaplan CW and Christopher LK, Bacterial succession in a petroleum land treatment unit. Appl Environ Microbio 70:1777-1786 (2004).
18. Al-Awadhi N, Al-Daher R, Elnawawy A and Balba MT, Bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil in Kuwait. I. Land-farming to remediate oil-contaminated soil. J Soil Contamin 5:243-260 (1996).
19. Liu WT, Marsh T, Cheng LH and Forney LJ, Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4156-4522 (1997).
20. Hsiao CR, Huang L, Bouchara J-P, Barton R, Li HC and Chang TC, Identification of medically important molds by an oligonucleotide array. J Clin Microbiol 43:3760-3768 (2005).
21. Tung SK, Teng LJ, Vaneechoutte M, Chen HM and Chang TC, Array-based identification of species of the genera Abiotrophia, Enterococcus, Granulicatella, and Streptococcus. J Clin Microbiol 44:4414-4424 (2006).
22. Leaw SN, Chang HC, Barton R, Bouchara J-P and Chang TC, Identification of medically important candida and non-Candida yeast species by an oligonucleotide array. J Clin Microbiol 45:2220-2229 (2007).
23. Young CC, Lin TC, Yeh MS, Shen FT and Chang JS, Identification and kinetic characteristics of an indigenous diesel-degrading Gordonia alkanivorans Strain. World J Microb Biotechnol 21:1409-1414 (2005).
24. Lin TC, Chang JS and Young CC, Exopolysaccharides produced by Gordonia alkanivorans enhance bacterial degradation activity for diesel. Biotechnol Lett 30:1201-1206 (2008).
25. Lin TC, Young CC, Ho MJ, Yeh MS, Chou CL, Wei YH et al. Characterization of floating activity of indigenous diesel-assimilating bacterial isolates. J Biosci Bioeng 99:466-472 (2005).
26. Whang LM, Liu PWG, Ma CC and Cheng SS, Application of biosurfactants, rhamnolipid, and surfactin, for enhanced biodegradation of diesel-contaminated water and soil. J Hazard Mater 151:155-163.
27. Whang LM, Liu PWG, Ma CC and Cheng SS, Application of rhamnolipid and surfactin for enhanced diesel biodegradation - effects of pH and ammonium addition. J Hazard Mater (DOI:10.1016/ j.jhazmat.2008.09.006)..
28. Ma CC, Using biosurfactants to enhance the biodegradation efficiency of indigenous in diesel contaminated soil. Master thesis (in Chinese). Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC (2005).
29. Wei YH, Chou JL and Chang JS, Rhamnolipid production by an indigenous isolate Pseudomonas aeruginosa J4 originating from petrochemical wastewater. Biochem Eng J 27:146-154.
30. Chen SY, Lu WB, Wei YH, Chen WM and Chang JS, Improved production of biosurfactant with newly isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa S2. Biotechnol Prog 23:661-666 (2007).
31. Pan PT, Land farming bioremediation of diesel contaminated soil associated with biostimulation and bioaugmentation. Master thesis (in Chinese). Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC (2006).
32. GardnerWH, Water content. in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edn, ed by Klute A. American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society and America, Madison, WI., USA, pp 493-541 (1986).
33. Gallego JLR, Loredo J, Llamas JF, Vazquez F and Sanche J, Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soils:evaluation of potential in situ techniques by study of bacterial degradation. Biodegradation 12:325-335 (2001).
34. Powers SE, Hurum D and Peters C, Petroleum hydrocarbon degradation in soils: monitoring cell growth as a measure of performance, in Environmental Engineering Processes Laboratory Manual, Session 3.3.3, ed by McNally DL and Mihelic JR. Association of Environmental Engineering and Science Professors (AEESP) (2001).
35. US Environmental Protection Agency, Ultrasonic Extraction. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods. Method 3550 B. 2nd Revision, December (1996).
36. US Environmental Protection Agency. Nonhalogenated organics using GC/ FID. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Method 8015B (1995).
37. Miller DN, Bryant JE, Madsen EL and Ghiorse WC, Evaluation and optimization of DNA extraction and purification procedures for soil and sediment samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4715-4724 (1999).
38. Kane MD, Poulsen LK and Stahl DA, Monitoring the enrichment and isolation of sulfate-reducing bacteria by using oligonucleotide hybridization probes designed from environmentally derived 16S rRNA sequences. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:682-686 (1993).
39. Ferris MJ, Muyzer G and Ward DM, Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of 16SrRNA-define dpopulations in habiting a hot spring microbial mat community. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:340-346 (1996).
40. Lukow T, Dunfield PF and Liesack W, Use of the T-RFLP technique to assess spatial and temporal changes in the bacterial community structure within an agricultural soil planted with transgenic and non-transgenic potato plants. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 32:241-247 (2000).
41. Yannarell AC and Triplett EW, Within- and between-lake variability in the composition of bacterioplankton communities: investigations using multiple spatial scales. Appl Environ Microb 70:214-223 (2004).
42. Kruskal JB, Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29:1-27 (1964).
43. Huesemann MH, Incomplete hydrocarbon biodegradation in contaminated soils: Limitations in bioavailability or inherent recalcitrance? Bioremediation J 1:27-39 (1997).
44. Nocentini M, Pinelli D, and Fava F, Bioremediation of a soil contaminated by hydrocarbonmixtures: the residual concentration problem. Chemosphere 41:1115-1123 (2000).
45. Chaineau CH, Yepremian C, Vidalie JF, Ducreus J and Ballerini D, Bioremediation of a crude oil-polluted soil: biodegradtion, leaching and toxicity assessments. Water, Air, Soil Pollut 144:419-440 (2003).
46. Chaineau CH, Morel JL and Oudot J, Microbial degradation in soil microcosms of fuel oil hydrocarbons from drilling cuttings. Environ Sci Technol 29:1615-1621 (1995).
47. Oudot J, Merlin FX and Pinvidic P, Weathering rates of oil components in a bioremediation experiment in estuarine sediments. Marine Environ Res 45:113-125 (1998).
48. Blackwood C, Marsh T, Sang-Hoon K and Eldor P, Terminal restriction analysis for quantative polymorph data analysis for quantative comparison of microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:926-932 (2003).
49. Muckian L, Grant R, Doyle E and Clipson N, Bacterial community structure insoil contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Chemosphere 68:1535-1541 (2007).