Incorporating user motivations to design for video tagging

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 221-232

  van Velsen, Lex ^a   Melenhorst, Mark ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b Novay   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Motivation; Tagging; User centered design; Video platforms

Indexed keywords

INDEXING (OF INFORMATION); USER CENTERED DESIGN;

FOCUS GROUPS; INTERNET USERS; ONLINE SURVEYS; TAGGING; USER MOTIVATION; VIDEO MATERIAL; VIDEO-PLATFORMS;

MOTIVATION;

EID: 67649116418     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2009.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ames, M., Naaman, M., 2007. Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. In: Proceedings of CHI 2007.
2. Ardichvili A., Page V., and Wentling T. Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management 7 1 (2003) 64-77
3. Brehm J.W., and Self E.A. The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology 40 1 (1989) 109-131
4. Carmagnola F., Cena F., Cortassa O., Gena C., and Torre I. Towards a tag-based user model: how can a user model benefit from tags?. In: Conati C., McKoy K., and Paliouras G. (Eds). UM 2007, LNAI 4511 (2007), Springer-Verlag 445-449
5. Deci E.L., and Ryan R.M. Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior (1985), Springer
6. Dibsdall L.A., Lambert N., Bobbin R.F., and Frewer L.J. Low-income consumers' attitudes and behaviour towards access, availability and motivation to eat fruit and vegetables. Public Health Nutrition 6 2 (2003) 159-168
7. Fogg B.J., and Eckles D. The behavior chain for online participation: how successful web services structure persuasion. In: DeKort Y., Ijsselstein W., Midden C.J.H., Eggen B., and Fogg B.J. (Eds). PERSUASIVE 2007, LNCS 4744 (2007), Springer 199-209
8. Golder S.A., and Huberman B.A. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science 32 2 (2006) 198-208
9. Harley D., and Fitzpatrick G. YouTube and intergenerational communication: the case of Geriatric1927. Universal Access in the Information Society 8 1 (2009) 5-20
10. Högg, R., Meckel, M., Stanoevska-Slabeva, K., Martignoni, R., 2006. Overview of business models for Web 2.0 communities. In: Proceedings of GeNeMe 2006.
11. Katz E., Blumler J.G., and Gurevitch M. Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly 37 4 (1973) 509-523
12. Kobsa A., Koenemann J., and Pohl W. Personalised hypermedia presentation techniques for improving online customer relationships. The Knowledge Engineering Review 16 2 (2001) 111-155
13. Lange P.G. Publicly private and privately public: social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 1 (2008) 361-380
14. Lee B., and Lee R.S. How and why people watch tv: implications for the future of interactive television. Journal of Advertising Research 35 6 (1995) 9-18
15. Lee, K.J., 2006. What goes around comes around: an analysis of del.icio.us as social space. In: Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.
16. Lin J.C., and Lu H. Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site. International Journal of Information Management 20 3 (2000) 197-208
17. Linden G., Smith B., and York J. Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing 7 1 (2003) 76-80
18. Livingstone S. The changing nature of audiences: from the mass audience to the interactive media user. In: Valdivia A. (Ed). The Blackwell Companion to Media Research (2003), Blackwell 337-359
19. Logan R.A., Nuttall R.J., Hazelwood S.E., Parker J.C., Johnson J.C., Hewett J.E., et al. Audience motivations to use an arthritis website. Arthritis Care and Research 13 5 (2000) 320-329
20. Loorbach N., Steehouder M., and Taal E. The effects of motivational elements in user instructions. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 20 2 (2006) 177-199
21. Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., Davis, M., 2006. HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia.
22. Matusiak K.K. Towards user-centered indexing in digital image collections. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives 22 4 (2006) 283-298
23. Melenhorst, M., Van Setten, M., 2007. Usefulness of tags in providing access to large information systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Professional Communication Conference.
24. Melenhorst, M., Grootveld, M., Van Setten, M., Veenstra, M., 2008. Tag-based information retrieval of video content. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Designing Interactive User Experiences for TV and Video.
25. Morgan D.L. Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology 22 1 (1996) 129-152
26. Morrison P.J. Tagging and searching: search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web. Information Processing and Management 44 4 (2008) 1562-1579
27. Nov O. What motivates Wikipedians?. Communications of the ACM 50 11 (2007) 60-64
28. Nov, O., Naaman, M., Ye, C., 2008. What drives content tagging: the case of photos on Flickr. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
29. Patton M.Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. third ed. (2002), Sage
30. Pieterson W., Ebbers W., and Van Dijk J. The opportunities and barriers of user profiling in the public sector. In: Wimmer M.A., Traunmüller R., Grönlund A., and Andersen K.V. (Eds). Electronic Government 2005 (2005), Springer 269-280
31. Rafaeli S., Raban D.R., and Ravid G. How social motivation enhances economic activity and incentives in the Google answers knowledge sharing market. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 3 1 (2007) 1-11
32. Rodgers S., and Sheldon K.M. An improved way to characterize internet users. Journal of Advertising Research 42 5 (2002) 85-94
33. Ryan R.M., and Deci E.L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 1 (2000) 54-67
34. Sen, S., Lam, S.K., Rashid, A.M., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Osterhouse, J., et al., 2005. Tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. In: Proceedings of CSCW'05.
35. Shang R., Chen Y., and Shen L. Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line. Information & Management 42 3 (2005) 401-413
36. Stafford T.F., Stafford M.R., and Schkade L.L. Determining uses and gratifications for the internet. Decision Sciences 35 2 (2004) 259-288
37. Stoeckl, R., Rohrmeier, P., Hess, T., 2007. Motivations to produce user generated content: differences between webloggers and videobloggers. In: Proceedings of 20th Bled eConference.
38. Teo T.S.H., Lim V.K.G., and Lai R.Y.C. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in internet usage. Omega 27 1 (1999) 25-37
39. Van Dijk J.A.G.M. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society (2005), Sage
40. Van Setten M. Supporting People in Finding Information: Hybrid Recommender Systems and Goal-Based Structuring (2005), Telematica Institute
41. Van Setten, M., Brussee, R., Van Vliet, H., Gazendam, L., Van Houten, Y., Veenstra, M., 2006. On the importance of who tagged what. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Social Navigation and Community-Based Adaptation Technologies.
42. vnunet.com, 2007. HTTP overtakes P2P as dominant web traffic [Electronic Version]. (retrieved 11.02.09).
43. Wasko M., and Faraj S. It is what one does: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9 2/3 (2000) 155-173
44. Wasko M., and Faraj S. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly 29 1 (2005) 35-57
45. Wu, H., Zubair, M., Maly, K., 2006. Harvesting social knowledge from folksonomies. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia.
46. Zollers, A., 2007. Emerging motivations for tagging: expression, performance, and activism. In: Proceedings of the 16th International World Wide Web Conference.