Axiom-based ontology matching

Expert Systems

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 218-246

  Fürst, Frédéric ^a   Trichet, Francky ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE PICARDIE JULES VERNE   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE EN COMMUNICATIONS ET CYBERNÉTIQUE DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Conceptual graphs; Heavyweight ontology; Interoperability; Knowledge engineering; Ontology matching; Semantic web

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL GRAPH; CONCEPTUAL GRAPHS; CURRENT TECHNIQUES; DOMAIN ONTOLOGIES; EXPLICIT REPRESENTATION; HEAVYWEIGHT ONTOLOGY; LIGHTWEIGHT ONTOLOGY; NATURAL LANGUAGE EXPRESSIONS; NEW APPROACHES; ONTOLOGY MATCHING; SEMANTIC CORRESPONDENCE; SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY;

INTEROPERABILITY; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 67649099188     PISSN: 02664720     EISSN: 14680394     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0394.2009.00482.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ashpole, B., M. Ehrig, J. Euzenat H. Stuckenschmidt (2005) Integrating ontologies, in Proceedings of the K-CAP 2005 Workshop on Integrating Ontologies, CEUR Proceedings, Vol. 156; available at.
2. Baget, J. (2005) RDF entailment as a graph homomorphism, in International Semantic Web Conference, Y. Gil, E. Motta, V.R. Benjamins M.A. Musen (eds), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3729, Berlin : Springer, 82 96.
3. Baget, J. M. Mugnier (2002) Extensions of simple conceptual graphs: the complexity of rules and constraints, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16, 425 465. (Pubitemid 43057179)
4. Bechhofer, S., R. Volz P. Lord (2003) Cooking the semantic web with the OWL API, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Semantic Web Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2870, Berlin : Springer, 659 675.
5. Berners-Lee, T., J. Handler O. Lassila (2001) The semantic web, Scientific American, 248, 35 43.
6. Bock, C. M. Gruninger (2004) PSL: a semantic domain for flow models, Software and Systems Modeling Journal, 4 (2), 209 231.
7. Chalupsky, H. (2000) OntoMorph: a translation system for symbolic knowledge, in Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann 471 482.
8. Choquet, G. (1955) Theory of capacities, Annales de l'Institut Fourier, 5, 131 295.
9. Doan, A. A. Halevy (2005) Semantic integration research in the database community: a brief survey, AI Magazine, 26 (1), 7 10.
10. Doan, A., J. Madhavan, P. Domingos A. Halevy (2004) Ontology matching: a machine learning approach, in Handbook on Ontologies in Information Systems, S. Staab R. Studer (eds), Berlin : Springer, pp. 397 416.
11. Dou, D., D. McDermmot P. Qi (2003) Ontology translation on the semantic web, in International Conference on Ontologies, Databases and Applications of Semantics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin: Springer, 952-969.
12. Ehrig, M. (2007) Ontology alignment, Computing for Human Experience, 4.
13. Ehrig, M. Y. Sure (2004) Ontology mapping - an integrated approach, in Proceedings of the 1st European Semantic Web Symposium, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3053, Berlin : Springer, 76 91. (Pubitemid 38699467)
14. Esperonto-IST-2001-34373 (2003) State-of-the-art report: indexing techniques, routing and peer-to-peer, similarity measures - deliverable 4.3, in Esperonto Services. Application Service Provision of Semantic Annotation, Aggregation, Indexing and Routing of Textual, Multimedia, and Multilingual Web Content; available at.
15. Euzenat, J. (2004) An API for ontology alignment, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3298, Berlin : Springer, 698 712.
16. Euzenat, J. P. Shvaiko (2007) Ontology Matching, Heidelberg : Springer.
17. Euzenat, J. P. Valtchev (2004) Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-Lite, in European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, R.L. de Mantaras L. Saitta (eds), Amsterdam : IOS Press, 333 337.
18. Falconer, S.M., N.F. Noy M. Storey (2006) Towards understanding the needs of cognitive support for ontology mapping, in International Workshop on Ontology Matching at the International Semantic Web Conference, CEUR Proceedings, Vol. 225; available at.
19. Fürst, F. (2003) TooCom: a tool to operationalize an ontology with the conceptual graph model, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools at the International Semantic Web Conference, CEUR Proceedings, Vol. 87; available at, pp. 57 70.
20. Fürst, F., M. Leclère F. Trichet (2004) Operationalizing domain ontologies: a method and a tool, in European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, R.L. de Mantaras L. Saitta (eds), Amsterdam : IOS Press, 318 322.
21. Fürst, F. F. Trichet (2006a) Heavyweight ontology engineering, in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ontologies, Databases and Applications of Semantics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4277, Berlin : Springer.
22. Fürst, F. F. Trichet (2006b) Reasoning on the semantic web needs to reason both on ontology-based assertions and on ontologies themselves, in International Workshop on Reasoning on the Web, co-located with the 15th International World Wide Web Conference.
23. Giunchiglia, F., P. Shvaiko M. Yatskevich (2004) S-Match: an algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching, in Proceedings of the 1st European Semantic Web Symposium, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3053, Berlin : Springer, 61 65.
24. Giunchiglia, F., M. Yatskevich P. Shvaiko (2007) Semantic matching: algorithms and implementation, Journal of Data Semantics, 9, 1 38.
25. Gomez-Perez, A., M. Fernandez-Lopez O. Corcho (2003) Ontological Engineering, Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing, Berlin : Springer.
26. Grabisch, M. (1995) Fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making, Fuzzy Sets and Systems Journal, 69 (3), 279 298.
27. Gruninger, M. (2005) Model-theoretic approaches to semantic integration, in Semantic Interoperability and Integration, Y. Kalfoglou, M. Schorlemmer, A. Sheth, S. Staab M. Uschold (eds), Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 04391, Wadern : Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum, Schloss Dagstuhl, extended abstract.
28. Kalfoglou, Y. M. Schorlemmer (2003) Ontology mapping: the state of the art, Knowledge Engineering Review, 18 (1), 1 31.
29. Kalfoglou, Y. M. Schorlemmer (2004) Formal support for representing and automating semantic interoperability, in Proceedings of the 1st European Semantic Web Symposium, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3053, Berlin : Springer, 45 60.
30. Maedche, A., B. Motik, L. Stojanovic, R. Studer R. Volz (2003) An infrastructure for searching, reusing and evolving distributed ontologies, in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the World Wide Web, New York: ACM, 439 448.
31. Marshall, B., H. Chen T. Madhusudan (2006) Matching knowledge elements in concept maps using a similarity flooding algorithm, Decision Support Systems, 42 (3), 1290 1306. (Pubitemid 44648426)
32. Miklos, Z., G. Neumann, U. Zdun M. Sintek (2005) Querying semantic web resources using triple views, in Semantic Interoperability and Integration, Y. Kalfoglou, M. Schorlemmer, A. Sheth, S. Staab M. Uschold (eds), Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 04391, Wadern : Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum, Schloss Dagstuhl.
33. Noy, N. (2004) Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches, SIGMOD Record, 33 (4), 65 70.
34. Noy, N.F. M. Musen (2003) The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59 (6), 983 1024.
35. Oberle, D., S. Staab, R. Studer R. Volz (2005) Supporting application development in the semantic web, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 5 (2), 34 68.
36. OWL (2004) Owl Ontology Language, W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004; available at.
37. Rahm, E. P. Bernstein (2001) A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching, VLDB Journal, 10 (4), 334 350. (Pubitemid 33570972)
38. Shvaiko, P. J. Euzenat (2005) A survey of schema-based matching approaches, Journal of Data Semantics, 4, 146 171.
39. Shvaiko, P., J. Euzenat, N. Noy, H. Stuckenschmidt, R. Benjamins M. Uschold (2006) Ontology Matching, in Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Ontology Matching, CEUR Proceedings, Vol 225; available at.
40. Sowa, J. (1984) Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine, Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
41. Sowa, J. (2000) Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations, Monterey, CA : Brooks/Cole.
42. Staab, S. A. Maedche (2000) Axioms are objects too: ontology engineering beyond the modeling of concepts and relations, Research Report 399, Institute AIFB, Karlsruhe.
43. Stumme, G. A. Maedche (2001) FCA-MERGE: bottom-up merging of ontologies, in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence, 225 234.
44. SWRL (2004) A semantic web language combining OWL and RuleML, available at.
45. Thanh Le, B., R. Dieng-Kuntz F. Gandon (2004) On ontology matching problems - for building a corporate semantic web in a multi-communities organization, in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Vol. 4, pp. 236 243.