An information mining method for deriving weights from an interval comparison matrix

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

Volumn 50, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 393-400

  Lan, JiBin ^a   Lin, Jian ^a,b   Cao, LiJuan ^a  

^a GUANGXI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b FUJIAN AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Consistency; Convex combination coefficients; Interval comparison matrix; Liner programming model; Weight vector

Indexed keywords

CONSISTENCY; CONVEX COMBINATION COEFFICIENTS; INTERVAL COMPARISON MATRIX; LINER PROGRAMMING MODEL; WEIGHT VECTOR;

LINEARIZATION; MINING; VECTORS;

WEIGHING;

EID: 67549144772     PISSN: 08957177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2009.04.015     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Arbel A., and Vargas L. Preference simulation and preference programming: Robustness issues in priority deviation. European J. Oper. Res. 69 (1993) 200-209
2. Arbel A., and Vargas L. The analytic hierarchy process with interval judgments. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference held in Fairfax (1992), Springer, New York
3. Laarhoven V., and Pedryze W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11 (1983) 229-241
4. Mikhailov L. Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 134 (2003) 365-385
5. Mikhailov L. Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method. Comput. Oper. Res. 31 (2004) 293-301
6. Saaty T., and Vargas L. Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. European J. Oper. Res. 23 (1987) 107-117
7. Vagas L. Analysis of sensitivity of reciprocal matrices. Appl. Math. Comput. 12 (1983) 201-220
8. Leung L., and Cao D. On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. European J. Oper. Res. 124 (2000) 102-113
9. Mikhailov L. A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements. European J. Oper. Res. 159 (2004) 687-704
10. Xu Z., and Wei C. A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process. European J. Oper. Res. 116 (1999) 443-449
11. Mustafa M. Project risk assessment using the analysis hierarchy process. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 38 (1991) 46-52
12. Lai V., and Wong B. Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection. European. J. Oper. Res. 137 (2002) 134-144
13. Contreras F., and Hanaki K. Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans. Resour. Conser. Recy. 52 (2008) 979-991
14. Wang Y., Yang J., and Xu D. Interval weight generation approaches based on consistency test and interval comparison matrices. Appl. Math. Comput. 167 (2005) 252-273
15. Saaty T. Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1988), RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
16. Saaty T., and Vargas L. Inconsistency and rank preservation. J. Math. Psych. 32 (1984) 205-214
17. Saaty T. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1980), McGraw-Hill Company, New York
18. Haines L. A statistical approach to the analytic hierarchy process with interval judgements Distributions on feasible regions. European J. Oper. Res. 110 (1998) 112-125
19. Lslam R., and Biswal M. Preference programming and inconsistent interval judgments. European. J. Oper. Res. 97 (1997) 53-62