Informed consent: Documenting the intersection of bureaucratic regulation and ethnographic practice

Political and Legal Anthropology Review

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 229-248

  Shannon, Jennifer ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

American Indians; Ethics; Informed consent; Institutional review boards; National museum of the American Indian

Indexed keywords

EID: 67549121344     PISSN: 10816976     EISSN: 15552934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/pol.2007.30.2.229     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Akrich, Madeleine., and Bruno Latour., 1992 A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies. InShaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. W. E.Bijker and J.Law eds.Pp.259-264. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Althusser, Louis., 1994 Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation). InMapping Ideology. SlavojZizek, ed.Pp.100-139. New York: Verso.
3. Brenneis, Don., 2005 Documenting Ethics. InEmbedding Ethics. L.Meskell and P.Pels, eds.Pp.239-252. Oxford, UK: Berg.
4. Chaat Smith, Paul., 2005 Curator Talk series at the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian(transcribed from webcam recording provided on CD-ROM by NMAI staff), March 4.
5. Chambers, Erve., 1980 Fieldwork and the Law: New Contexts for Ethical Decision Making. Special edition, “Ethical Problems of Fieldwork, " Social Problems 27(3): 330-341.
6. The Cornell University Committee on Human Subjects [UCHS] 2006 Use of Human Subjects in Research. Electronic document, http://www.osp.cornell.edu/Compliance/UCHS/homepageUCHS.htm, accessed October 15, 2006.
7. Deloria, Vine., 1980 Our New Research Society: Some Warnings for Social Scientists. Special edition, “Ethical Problems of Fieldwork, " Social Problems 27(3): 330-341.
8. Deloria, Vine., 1988[1969] Custer Died for Your Sins: An Indian Manifesto. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
9. Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn, ed. 2003 Ethics and the Profession of Anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
10. Grobsmith, Elizabeth S., 1997 Growing Up on Deloria: The Impact of His Work on a New Generation of Anthropologists. InIndians and Anthropologists: Vine Deloria, Jr., and the Critique of Anthropology. T.Biolsi and L. J.Zimmerman, eds.Pp.35-49. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
11. Howe, Craig., 2001 Exhibiting Indians: Communities, Collaboration and Control. Exhibitionist 20(1): 28-33.
12. Howe, Craig., 2005 The Morality of Exhibiting Indians. InEmbedding Ethics. L.Meskell and P.Pels, eds.Pp.219-238. Oxford, UK: Berg.
13. King, Cecil., 1997 Here Come the Anthros. InIndians and Anthropologists: Vine Deloria, Jr., and the Critique of Anthropology. T.Biolsi and L. J.Zimmerman, eds.Pp.115-119. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
14. Howe, Craig., 2006a Introduction: Anxious Borders between Work and Life in a Time of Bureaucratic Ethics Regulation. American Ethnologist 33(4): 477-481.
15. Howe, Craig., 2006b The Perils of Working at Home: IRB “Mission Creep” as Context and Content for an Ethnography of Disciplinary Knowledges. American Ethnologist 33(4): 482-491.
16. Medicine, Beatrice., 2001 Anthropology as the Indian’s Image-Maker. InLearning to Be an Anthropologist and Remaining “Native”: Selected Writings. B.Medicine and S.-E.Jacobs, eds.Pp.289-294. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
17. Meskell, Lynn., and Peter Pels., 2005 Introduction: Embedding Ethics. InEmbedding Ethics. L.Meskell and P.Pels, eds.Pp.1-28. Oxford, UK: Berg.
18. Nason, James D., 2000 Our” Indians: The Unidimensional Indian in the Disembodied Past. InThe Changing Presentation of the American Indian: Museums and Native Cultures. R.West, ed.Pp.29-46. Washington, DC: National Museum of the American Indian.
19. Peers, Laura L., and Alison K. Brown., 2003 Introduction. InMuseums and Source Communities: A Routledge Reader. L. L.Peers and A. K.Brown, eds.Pp.1-16. London: Routledge.
20. Riles, Annelise, ed. 2006a Documents: Artifacts of Modern knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
21. Riles, Annelise, ed. 2006b Anthropology, Human Rights, and Legal Knowledge: Culture in the Iron Cage. American Anthropologist 108(1): 52-65.
22. Shore, Cris., and Susan Wright., 2000 Coercive Accountability: The Rise of Audit Culture in Higher Education. InAudit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. M.Strathern, ed.Pp.57-89. London: Routledge.
23. Strathern, Marilyn, ed. 2000 Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. London: Routledge.
24. Wax, Murray L., 1980 Paradoxes of “Consent” to the Practices of Fieldwork. Special edition, “Ethical Problems of Fieldwork, " Social Problems 27(3): 272-283.
25. Weber, Max., 1968 On Charisma and Institution Building. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. West, Rick, ed. 2000 Introduction, A New Idea of Ourselves: The Changing Presentation of the American Indian. InThe Changing Presentation of the American Indian: Museums and Native Cultures. R.West, ed.Pp.7-14. Washington, DC: National Museum of the American Indian.
27. West, Rick, ed. 2004 The National Museum of the American Indian: A Historical Reckoning.” Remarks by W. Richard West., Jr., at the National Press Club, September 9, 2004. Electronic document, http://www.nmai.si.edu/press/releases/09-09-04_NPC_remarks_by_rick_west.pdf, accessed October 15, 2006.