A process evaluation of an injury prevention school-based programme for adolescents

Health Education Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 507-519

  Buckley, L ^a   Sheehan, M ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILDHOOD INJURY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; JUVENILE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; SCHOOL;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; MALE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RISK-TAKING; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 67449159266     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyn049     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Botvin GJ. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. JAMA 1995; 273: 1106-12.
2. Perry CL, Williams CL, Komro KA et al. Project Northland: long-term outcomes of community action to reduce adolescent alcohol use. Health Educ Res 2002; 17: 117-32.
3. Sheehan M, Schonfeld C, Ballard R et al. A three year outcome evaluation of a theory based drink driving education program. J Drug Educ 1996; 26: 395-412.
4. Durlak JA, Wells AM. Primary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents: a meta-analytical review. Am J Community Psychol 1997; 25: 207-14.
5. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M et al. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res 2003; 18: 237-56.
6. Buckley L, Sheehan M. Behaviour change programs. In: McClure R, Stevenson M, McEvoy S (eds). The Scientific Basis of Injury Prevention and Control. Melbourne: IP Communications, 2004; 334-46.
7. Baranowski T, Stables G. Process evaluations of the 5-a-day projects. Health Educ Behav 2000; 27: 157-66.
8. Dane AV, Schneider BH. Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control? Clin Psychol Rev 1998; 18: 23-45.
9. Perry CL. Creating Health Behavior Change: How to Develop Community-wide Programs for Youth?. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999.
10. Botvin GJ, Griffin KW, Diaz T et al. Preventing binge drinking during early adolescence: one-and two-year follow-up of a school-based prevention intervention. Psychol Addict Behav 2001; 15: 360-5.
11. Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenbury L et al. Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multi-modal cognitive-behavioral approach: results of a three-year study. J Consult Clin Psychol 1990; 58: 437-46.
12. Sussman S, Dent CW, Galaif ER et al. Implementation and process evaluation of a student "School-as-Community" group. Eval Rev 1997; 21: 94-123.
13. Harnett PH, Dadds MR. Training school personnel to implement a universal school-based prevention of depression program under real-world conditions. J Sch Psychol 2004; 42: 343-57.
14. Harachi TW, Abbott RD, Catalano RF et al. Opening the black box: evaluation measures to assess implementation and theory building. Am J Community Psychol 1999; 27: 711-32.
15. Sanchez V, Stekler A, Nitirat P et al. Fidelity of implementation in a treatment effectiveness trial of reconnecting youth. Health Educ Res 2007; 22: 95-107.
16. Dent CW, Stacy AW, Sussman S et al. Implementation and process evaluation of a school-based drug abuse prevention program: project toward no drug abuse. J Drug Educ 1998; 28: 361-75.
17. Cuijpers P. Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs. A systematic review. Addict Behav 2002; 27: 1009-23.
18. Sussman S, Rohrbach LA, Patel R et al. A look at interactive classroom-based drug abuse prevention program: interactive contents and suggestions for research. J Drug Educ 2003; 33: 355-68.
19. Shope JT, Elliott M, Raghunathan TE et al. Long term follow-up of a high school alcohol misuse prevention program's effect on students subsequent driving. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2001; 25: 403-10.
20. Tobler NS, Stratton HH. Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: a meta-analysis of the research. J Prim Prev 1997; 18: 71-128.
21. Buckley L, Sheehan M. Evaluation of an Australian School Based Intervention to Increase Protective Behaviours. Presentation to Committee on Alcohol Other Drugs and Transportation Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Ministry of Transport, 2007.
22. Buckley L. Adolescents' Perspective of Transport Related Risk-taking and Injury: Definitions, Consequences, and Risk and Protective Factors. Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference. Wellington, New Zealand; 2005.
23. Ajzen I. From decisions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J (eds). Action-control: From Cognition to Behavior. New York: Springer, 1985, 11-39.
24. Glanz K, Rimer B, Lewis F. Theory, Research and Practice: Interrelationships. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2002.
25. Fagan AA, Mihalic S. Strategies for enhancing the adoption of school-based prevention programs: lessons learned from the blueprints for violence prevention replications of the life skills training program. J Community Psychol 2003; 31: 235-53.
26. Morgan DL. Planning Focus Groups (Book2). Focus Group Kit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
27. Jelalian E, Spirito A, Rasile D et al. Risk taking, reported injury, and perception of future injury among adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol 2000; 22: 513-31.
28. Western J, Lynch M, Ogilvie E. Understanding Youth Crime: An Australian Study. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2003.
29. Lynch DM, Gennat HC, Celenza T et al. Community senior first aid training in Western Australia: its extent and effect on knowledge and skills. Aust N Z J Public Health 2006; 30: 147-50.
30. Kruger RA. Analyzing and Reporting Focus Groups Results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
31. Melde C, Esbensen F, Tusinski K. Addressing program fidelity using onsite observations and program provider descriptions of program delivery. Eval Rev 2006; 30: 714-32.
32. Lillehoj CJ, Griffin KW, Spoth R. Program provider observer ratings of school-based preventive intervention implementation: agreement and relation to youth outcomes. Health Educ Behav 2004; 31: 242-57.
33. Hansen WB. Pilot test results comparing the all stars program with seventh grade D.A.R.E.: program integrity and mediating variable analysis. Subst Use Misuse 1996; 31: 1359-77.
34. Botvin GJ, Baker E, Filazzola AD et al. A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: one-year follow-up. Addict Behav 1990; 15: 47-63.
35. Griner Hill L, Maucione K, Hood BK. A focused approach to assessing program fidelity. Prev Sci 2007; 8: 25-34.
36. Tappe MK, Galer-Unti RA, Bailey KC. Long-term implementation of the teenage health teaching modules by trained teachers: a case study. J Sch Health 1995; 65: 411-5.