Preimplantation genetic screening outcomes are associated with culture conditions

Human Reproduction

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1212-1220

  Beyer, C E ^a   Osianlis, T ^a   Boekel, K ^a   Osborne, E ^a   Rombauts, L ^a   Catt, J ^a   Kralevski, V ^a   Aali, B S ^b   Gras, L ^a  

^a MONASH IVF   (Australia)

^b KERMAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Advanced maternal age; Aneuploidy screening; Laboratory procedures; Preimplantation genetic screening

Indexed keywords

CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; PROGESTERONE; RECOMBINANT CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN;

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME 15; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; EMBRYO CULTURE; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 67449155872     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den502     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abdelhadi I, Colls P, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for 13 chromosomes. Reprod Biomed Online 2003:6:226-231.
2. Bavister BD. Culture of preimplantation embryos: facts and artifacts. Hum Reprod Update 1995;1:91-148.
3. Braude P, Flinter F. Use and misuse of preimplantation genetic testing. BMJ 2007;335:752-754.
4. Cohen J, Grifo J. Multicentre trial of preimplantation genetic screening reported in the New England Journal of Medicine: an in-depth look at the findings. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;15:365-366.
5. Cohen J, Wells D, Munne S. Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertil Steril 2007:87:496-503.
6. Delhanty J, Griffin D, Handyside A, Harper J, Atkinson G, Pieters M, Winston R. Detection of aneuploidy and chromosomal mosaicism in human embryos during preimplantation sex determination by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH). Hum Moi Genet 1993;2:1 183 -1185.
7. Gianaroli L, Magli M, Ferraretti A, Munne S. Preimplantation genetics diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. Fertil Steril 1999;72:837-844.
8. Gianaroli L, Magli M, Ferraretti A. The in vivo and in vitro efficiency and efficacy of PGD for aneuploidy. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2001 ; 183:S 13-S18.
9. Gianaroli L, Magli M, Ferraretti A, Tabanelli C, Trengia V, Farfalli V, Cavallini G. The beneficial effects of preimplantation genetics diagnosis for aneuploidy support extensive clinical application. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10:633-640.
10. Handyside AH, Pattinson JK, Penketh RJ, Delhanty JD, Winston RM, Tuddenham EG. Biopsy of human preimplantation embryos and sexing by DNA amplification. Lancet 1989; 1:347-349.
11. Hardarson T, Hanson C, Lundin K, Hillensjö T, Nilsson L, Stevic J, Reismer E, Borg K, Wikland M, Bergh C. Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2008:23:2806-2812.
12. Harper J, Sermon K, Geraedts J, Vesela K, Harton G, Thornhill A, Pehlivan T, Fiorentino F, SenGupta S, de Die-Smulders C et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? Hum Reprod 2008; 23:478-480.
13. Kahraman S, Bahce M, Samli H, Imirzalioglu N, Yakisn K, Cengiz G, Dönmez E. Healthy births and ongoing pregnancies obtained by PGD in patients with advanced maternal age and recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:2003 -2007.
14. Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y. Impact of PGD for chromosome disorders on reproductive outcome. Reprod Biomed Online 2008:16:9- 10.
15. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, Van Echten-Arends J, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar J, Verhoeve H, Vogel N, Arts E, de Vries J, Bossuyt P et al. Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age. N Engl J Med 2007;357:9-17.
16. Munne S. Chromosome abnormalities and their relationship to morphology and development of human embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;12:234-253.
17. Munne S, Magli C, Cohen J, Morton P, Sadowy S, Gianaroli L, Tucker M, Màrquez C, Sable D, Ferraretti A et al. Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy In human embryos. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2191-2199.
18. Munne S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, VeIilla E, Walmsley R, Sadowy S, Cohen J, Sable D. Improved Implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reprod Biomed Online 2003:7:91 -97.
19. Munne S, Fischer J, Warner A, Chen S, Zouves C, Cohen J, and the Referring Centres PGD Group. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly reduces pregnancy loss In Infertile couples: a multicenter study. Fertil Steril 2006:85:326-332.
20. Munne S, Cohen J, Gianaroli L Tur Kaspa I, Magli C, Sandalinas M, Grifo J, Cram D, Kahraman S, Verlinsky Y et al. Editorial: embryo damage by sub optimal biopsy may interfere with clinical success of PGD for infertility. Fertil Steril 2007a. www.reproductivegenetlcs.com.
21. Munne S, Gianaroli L Tur-Kaspa I, Magli C, Sandalinas M, Grifo J, Cram D, Kahraman S, Verlinsky Y, Simpson JL. Substandard application of preimplantation genetic screening may interfere with its clinical success. Fertil Steril 2007b;88:78l -784.
22. Platteau P, Staessen C, Michiels A, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I, Devroey P. Preimplantation genetics diagnosis for aneuploidy on patients with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril 2005; 83:393-397.
23. Rubio C, Rodrigo L, Perez Cano I, Mercader A, Mateu E, Buendia P, Remohi J, Simón C, Pellicer A. FISH screening of aneuploidies in preimplantation embryos to improve IVF outcome. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;11:497-506.
24. Schoolcraft W, Katz.jaffe M, Stevens J, Rawlins M, Munne S. Preimplantation aneuploidy testing for infertile patients of advanced maternal age: a randomized prospective trial. Fertil Steril 2008 (in press).
25. Shahine L Cedars M. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis does not increase pregnancy rates in patients at risk for aneuploidy. Fertil Steril 2006; 85:51-56.
26. Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E, Michiels A, Tournaye H, Camus M, Devroey P, Liebaers I, Van Stelrteghem A. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2004; 19:2849 -2858.
27. Twisk M, Mastenbroek S, Hoek A, Heineman MJ, van der Veen F, Bossuyt P, Repping S, Korevaar J. No beneficial effect of preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age with a high risk for embryonic aneuploidy. Hum Reprod 2008; 23:2813-2817.
28. Wilton L Preimplantation genetics diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in early human embryos: a review. Prenat Diagn 2002;22:5 12- 518.