Research progress in regional ecological risk assessment methods

Chinese Journal of Ecology

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 762-767

  Zhou, Ting ^a   Meng, Ji Jun ^a  

^a Peking University   (China)

Author keywords

Conceptual model; Ecological risk assessment; Procedure for ecological tiered assessment of risks; Relative risk assessment model

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; HETEROGENEITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPATIAL VARIATION;

EID: 67449149318     PISSN: 10004890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Chinese Sourses.
2. Chinese Sourses.
3. Chinese Sourses.
4. Chinese Sourses.
5. Chinese Sourses.
6. Chinese Sourses.
7. Chinese Sourses.
8. Chinese Sourses.
9. Chinese Sourses.
10. Chinese Sourses.
11. Chinese Sourses.
12. Chinese Sourses.
13. Chinese Sourses.
14. Chinese Sourses.
15. Chinese Sourses.
16. Chinese Sourses.
17. Chinese Sourses.
18. Chinese Sourses.
19. Chinese Sourses.
20. Chinese Sourses.
21. Chinese Sourses.
22. Chinese Sourses.
23. Chinese Sourses.
24. Australian Government. 1999. National Environmental Protec( Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure. Adelaide, Australia; National Environmental Protection Council.
25. Barnthouse LW, Suter II GW. 1986. User' s annual for Ecological Risk Assessment. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
26. Chow TE, Gaines KF, Hodgson ME, et al. 2005. Habitat and exposure modeling of raccoon for ecological risk assessment: A case study in Savannsh River Site. Ecological Modelling, 189: 151-167.. Claassen M, Strydom WF, Murray K. 2001. Ecological Risk Assessment Guidelines. Pretoria, South Africa: Water Research Commission.
27. Enea M, Salemi G. 2001. Fuzzy approach to the environmental impact evaluation. Ecological Modelling, 135: 131-147.
28. Environment Canada. 1994. Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment at Contaminated Sites in Canada: Review and Recommendations. Ottawa, Canada; Ecosystem Conservation Directorate, National Contaminated Sites Remediation Program, Environment Canada.
29. Glenn W, Suter II GW. 2005. An integrated framework for health and ecological risk assessment. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2; 611-616.
30. Hakanson L. 1980. An ecology risk index for aquatic pollution control: A sediment logical approach. Water Resources, 14: 975-1001.
31. Hayes EH, Landis WG. 2002. Regional ecological assessment of a near shore marine environment; Cherry Point, WA. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 10: 299-325.
32. Heuvelink GB, Burrough PA. 1993. Error propagation in cartographic modeling using Boolean logic and continuous classification. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7: 231-246.
33. Hooper BP, Duggin JA. 1996. Ecological riverine floodplain zoning: Its application to rural floodplain management in the Murray Darling Basin. Land Use Policy, 13: 87-99.
34. Hunsaker CT, Goodchild MF, Friedl MA, et al. 2001. Spatial Uncertainty in Ecology. New York; Springer.
35. Hunsaker CT, Graham RL, Suter GW II, et al. 1990. Assessing ecological risk on a regional scale. Environmental Management, 14: 324-332.
36. Landis WG. 2005. Regional Scale Ecological Risk Assessment; Using the Relative Risk Model. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
37. Louks OL. 1985. Looking for surprise in managing stressed ecosystems. Bioscience, 35: 428-432.
38. Lu H, Axe L, Tyson TA. 2003. Development and application of a computer simulation tool for ecological risk assessment. Environment, Modeling & Assessment, 8: 311-322.
39. MHPPE. 1989. Premises for Risk Management: Risk Limits in the Context of Environmental Policy. Directorate General for Environmental Protection. The Netherlands; The Hague.
40. Ming F, Thongsri T, Axe L. 2005. Using a probabilistic approach in an ecological risk assessment simulation tool; Test case for depleted uranium. Chemosphere, 60: 111 - 125.
41. Moraes R, Molander S. 2004. A procedure for ecological tiered assessment of risks (PETAR). Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 10: 349.
42. Roussel O, Cavelier A, van der Werf HMG. 2000. Adaptation and use of a fuzzy expert system to assess the environmental effect of pesticides applied to field c rops. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 80: 143-158.
43. USEPA. 1992. Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment. Washington DC; U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
44. USEPA. 1998. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. Washington DC; U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
45. Walker R, Landis W, Brown P. 2001. Developing aregional ecological risk assessment; A case study of a Tasmania agricultural catchment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 7: 431-442.
46. Wallack RN, Hope BK. 2002. Quantitative consideration of ecosystem characteristics in an ecological risk assessment; A case study. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 8: 1805-1814.