-
1
-
-
0028361779
-
A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review
-
Laband DN, Piette MJ. A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review. JAMA 1994;272:147-149
-
(1994)
JAMA
, vol.272
, pp. 147-149
-
-
Laband, D.N.1
Piette, M.J.2
-
2
-
-
0028229499
-
The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review
-
Fisher M, Friedman SB, Strauss B. The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review. JAMA 1994;272:143-146
-
(1994)
JAMA
, vol.272
, pp. 143-146
-
-
Fisher, M.1
Friedman, S.B.2
Strauss, B.3
-
3
-
-
0025055343
-
The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial
-
McNutt RA, Evans AT, Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial. JAMA 1990:263:1371-1376
-
(1990)
JAMA
, vol.263
, pp. 1371-1376
-
-
McNutt, R.A.1
Evans, A.T.2
Fletcher, R.H.3
Fletcher, S.W.4
-
4
-
-
0032973479
-
How to avoid "unblinding" the peer review process
-
editorial
-
Krinsky G. How to avoid "unblinding" the peer review process. (editorial) AJR 1999;172:1474
-
(1999)
AJR
, vol.172
, pp. 1474
-
-
Krinsky, G.1
-
5
-
-
0032527564
-
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial
-
van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Smith R, Black N. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial. JAMA 1998;280:234-237
-
(1998)
JAMA
, vol.280
, pp. 234-237
-
-
Van Rooyen, S.1
Godlee, F.2
Evans, S.3
Smith, R.4
Black, N.5
-
6
-
-
0032527549
-
Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: A randomized controlled trial
-
Godlee F, Gale CR, Martyn CN. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998;280:237-240
-
(1998)
JAMA
, vol.280
, pp. 237-240
-
-
Godlee, F.1
Gale, C.R.2
Martyn, C.N.3
-
7
-
-
0032527565
-
Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial
-
PEER Investigators. erratum in JAMA 1998;280:968
-
Justice AC, Cho MK, Winker MA, Berlin JA, Rennie D. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators. JAMA 1998;280:240-242; erratum in JAMA 1998;280:968
-
(1998)
JAMA
, vol.280
, pp. 240-242
-
-
Justice, A.C.1
Cho, M.K.2
Winker, M.A.3
Berlin, J.A.4
Rennie, D.5
-
8
-
-
0032527550
-
Masking author identity in peer review: What factors influence masking success?
-
PEER Investigators
-
Cho MK, Justice AC, Winker MA. et al. Masking author identity in peer review: What factors influence masking success? PEER Investigators. JAMA 1998; 280:243-245
-
(1998)
JAMA
, vol.280
, pp. 243-245
-
-
Cho, M.K.1
Justice, A.C.2
Winker, M.A.3
-
9
-
-
0026342591
-
How blind is blind review?
-
Yankauer A. How blind is blind review? Am J Pub Health 1991;81:843-845
-
(1991)
Am J Pub Health
, vol.81
, pp. 843-845
-
-
Yankauer, A.1
-
10
-
-
0032238833
-
Blinded reviews
-
editorial
-
Block AJ. Blinded reviews. (editorial) Chest 1998;114:1501-1502
-
(1998)
Chest
, vol.114
, pp. 1501-1502
-
-
Block, A.J.1
-
11
-
-
0024205061
-
Comment: Blind peer review of journal articles
-
Shaughnessy AF. Comment: Blind peer review of journal articles. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1988;22:1006
-
(1988)
Drug Intell Clin Pharm
, vol.22
, pp. 1006
-
-
Shaughnessy, A.F.1
-
12
-
-
0024040622
-
Blind versus nonblind review: Survey of selected medical journals
-
Cleary JD, Alexander B. Blind versus nonblind review: Survey of selected medical journals. Drug Intell Clin Phann 1988;22:601-602
-
(1988)
Drug Intell Clin Phann
, vol.22
, pp. 601-602
-
-
Cleary, J.D.1
Alexander, B.2
-
13
-
-
0031974522
-
Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded
-
Davidoff F. Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:66-68
-
(1998)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.128
, pp. 66-68
-
-
Davidoff, F.1
-
14
-
-
0032703502
-
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review
-
van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Smith R, Black N. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review. J Gen Intern Med 1999;14:622-624
-
(1999)
J Gen Intern Med
, vol.14
, pp. 622-624
-
-
Van Rooyen, S.1
Godlee, F.2
Evans, S.3
Smith, R.4
Black, N.5
-
15
-
-
0028901196
-
Blinded manuscript review: An idea whose time has come?
-
Pitkin RM. Blinded manuscript review: An idea whose time has come? Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:781-782
-
(1995)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.85
, pp. 781-782
-
-
Pitkin, R.M.1
|