A standard operating protocol (SOP) and minimum data set (MDS) for nursing and medical handover: Considerations for flexible standardization in developing electronic tools

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 143, Issue , 2009, Pages 501-506

  Turner, Paul ^a   Wong, Ming Chao ^a   Yee, Kwang Chien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Clinical handover; Electronic tools; Standardized operating protocol

Indexed keywords

NURSING; STANDARDIZATION;

ELECTRONIC TOOLS; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS; HANDOVER; HUMAN CENTRED DESIGN; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; SITUATIONAL AWARENESS; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

CLINICAL RESEARCH;

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NURSING CARE; PATIENT TRANSPORT; SAFETY; STANDARD;

HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NURSING CARE; PATIENT TRANSFER; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; TASMANIA;

EID: 67449091034     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-58603-979-0-501     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Reinertsen JL, Grosfield AG, Rupp W, Witthington JW. Engaging physicians in a shared quality agenda. IHI Innovation Series White paper. Cambridge, Massachesetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2007.
2. Australian Medical Association. Safe Handover: Safe patients. Guidance on clinical handover for clinicians and managers. AMA Limited, ACT, 2006.
3. Junior Doctors Committee. Safe handover: Safe patient. British Medical Association, London, 2004.
4. World Health Organization. Communication during patient handovers. Patient Safety Solutions. vol 1: solution 3. World Health Organization (WHO); 2007.
5. Turner P, Wong MC, Yee KC. Understanding interactions of factors influencing clinical handover: insights for information technology. In: Westbrook J, Callen J, Margelis G Warren J eds. HIC 2006 and HINZ 2006: Proc. pages: 328-333. Brunswick East, Vic.: Health Informatics Society of Australia; 2006:328-333.
6. Wong MC, Yee KC, Turner P. A Structured Evidence-based Literature Review regarding the Effectiveness of Improvement Interventions in Clinical Handover [Internet]. Health Services Research Group, University of Tasmania,Australia. 2008 Apr. [cited 2008 Nov 30]. Available from: http://www.safetyandquality.gov. au/internet/safety/publishing.nsf/Content/E0B59E130FA90A50CA2573AF007BC3C8/ $File/CHoverLitReview.pdf
7. Cheah L, Amott DH, Pollard J, Watters DAK. Electronic medical handover: towards safer medical care. Med J Aust. 2005;183(7):369-372.
8. Wong, MC, Turner P, Yee KC. Socio-Cultural Issues and Patient Safety: A Case Study into the Development of an Electronic Support Tool for Clinical Handover. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;130:279-289.
9. Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(6):523-530.
10. Littlejohns P, Wyatt JN, Garvican L. Evaluating computerised health information systems: hard lessons still to be learnt. BMJ. 2003;326(7394):860-863.
11. rd International Conference on Information Technology in Health Care (ITHC2007). Amsterdam: IOS Press;2007:279-289.
12. Wears RL, Berg M. Computer technology and clinical work: Still waiting for godot. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1261-1263.
13. Ammenwerth E, Talmon J, Ash JS, et al. Impact of CPOE on mortality rates - contradictory findings, important messages. Methods Inf Med. 2006;45(6):586-593.
14. Coiera E. Putting the technical back into socio-technical systems research. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76(Suppl 1):S98-103.
15. Ramanujam R, Keyser, DJ and Sirio CA. Making a case for organizational change in patient safety initiatives. In: AHRQ ed. Advances in patient safety. vol 2. 2005;455-465.