Response to Minocha

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 104, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1597-1598

  Rex, Douglas K ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER PREVENTION; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 67349275314     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.145     Document Type: Letter

References (15)

1. Minocha A. Video-recording documentation of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:1596-7 (this issue).
2. Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER Beach M et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 2005;129:34-41.
3. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:1-8.
4. Barclay R, Vicari JJ Johanson JF et al. Variation in adenoma detection rates and colonoscopic withdrawal times during screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:AB107.
5. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:856-61.
6. Rex DK. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2866-77.
7. Rex DK. Colonoscopy versus barium enema: a reappraisal of the facts and issues- Reply. Gastroenterology 1997;113:1049-50.
8. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007;132:96-102.
9. Singh H, Turner D, Xue L et al. Colorectal cancers after a negative colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2007;132:A149.
10. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1296-308.
11. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:S16-28.
12. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL. Efect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:1091-8.
13. Sawhney MS, Cury MS, Neeman N et al. Efect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 min on polyp detection. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1892-8.
14. Fatima H, Rex DK, Rothstein R et al. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopies: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:109-14.
15. Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:33-6.