Comparison between open and laparoscopic technique in the management of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 226-229

  Seelig, Matthias H ^a   Seelig, Stefanie K ^b   Behr, Christian ^c   Schönleben, Klaus ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b State Hospital for Psychiatry Osnabrueck   (Germany)

^c KLINIKUM LUDWIGSHAFEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Gastroduodenal ulcer; Laparoscopy; Perforation

Indexed keywords

PETHIDINE; PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR; TRAMADOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GASTRODUODENAL ULCER; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; PERITONITIS; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; ULCER PERFORATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEPTIC ULCER PERFORATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0042009548     PISSN: 01920790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004836-200309000-00007     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Svanes C, Lie RT, Svanes K, et al. Adverse effects of delayed treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Surg. 1994;220:168-75.
2. Blomgren LGM. Perforated peptic ulcer: long-term results of simple closure in the elderly. World J Surg. 1997;21:412-5.
3. Chou NH, Mok KT, Chang HT, et al. Risk factors of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer. Eur J Surg. 2000;166:149-53.
4. Mouret P, Francois Y, Vagnal J, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 1991;77:1006.
5. Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, et al. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated gastric ulcer using suture or suture less technique. Ann Surg. 1996;224:131-8.
6. Johansson B, Hallerbäck B, Glise H, et al. Laparoscopic suture closure of perforated peptic ulcer: a nonrandomized comparison with open surgery. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:656-8.
7. Miserez M, Eypasch E, Spangenberger W, et al. Laparoscopic and conventional closure of perforated peptic ulcer: a comparison. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:831-6.
8. Sø JBY, Kum CK, Fernandez ML, et al. Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:1060-3.
9. Druart ML, Van Hee R, Etienne J, et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:1017-20.
10. Linder MM, Wacha H, Feldmann U, et al. Der Mannheimer Peritonitis-Index. Chirurg. 1987;58:84-92.
11. Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BKB, et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2002;235:313-9.
12. Tate JJT, Dawson JW, Law WY, et al. Suture less laparoscopic treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer. Br J Surg. 1993;80:235.
13. Darzi A, Cheshire NJ, Somers SS, et al. Br J Surg. 1993;80:1552.
14. Lee FYJ, Leung KL, Lai PBS, et al. Selection of patients for laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 2001;88:133-6.
15. Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Mason RJ, et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive patients. Arch Surg. 1999;134:845-50.
16. Khoursheed M, Fuad M, Safar H, et al. Laparoscopic closure of perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:56-8.
17. Siu WT, Leong HT, Li MK. Single stitch laparoscopic omental patch repair of perforated peptic ulcer. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1997;42:92-4.
18. Lee FYJ, Leung KL, Lai BSP, et al. Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers. Arch Surg. 2001;136:90-3.
19. Bergamaschi R, Marvik R, Johnson G, et al. Open vs. laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:679-82.
20. Næsgaard JM, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, et al. Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:209-14.